Forum Index
»
VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Nottingham did not have 3 K classes last year - they had 2. Verdict is still out on this year but it appears another year of 24+ classes. No one is getting something youâre not. |
Yes, we already know the county board doesnât value the schools. Too bad Arlington doesnât value schools as much as other affluent areas do. |
+1 Rs donât actually want to help schools. They just to tear them down. |
Right, I was just using it as an example of the only way in which class size could be affected by this proposal. You did have 3 K classes of something like 15-16 kids each for a couple years, then when the max cap was raised they could take it down to only 2. The point on caps was they are the same whether youâre at Nottingham or Discovery or Tuckahoe or Jamestown. Consolidating schools will not affect class size. APS increasing class sizes is an unrelated conversation, and one that started years ago. I agree and Iâm not in favor of larger class sizes, but thatâs not pertinent to this discussion. |
I mean, maybe if they werenât spending $100m+ on schools that werenât needed⌠|
Itâs not that they donât value schools. Itâs that they are balancing the needs of the rest of the county. Most Arlington voters donât have kids at APS. They donât have kids at all. So thatâs the dynamic here. You canât compare Arlington to smaller more homogenous wealthy areas. I donât like the situation with the schools either, but I understand why itâs happening. |
Well, the County's big push to upzone and maximize density at the expense of families will ultimately make schools less important and then the County will have tons of money for all the other things it is trying to "balance." FWIW, I don't think they need to raise the revenue %age they allocate to APS. Instead, I think the County should take care of APS' capital needs and leave the APS budget for teachers, instruction, etc. |
Which is short-sighted. The county pours so much money into frivolous things (dog park! bus stop!) and doesnât prioritize education, which has a huge impact on our society. Even for people without kids. |
Agreed. |
I agree, but only to an extent. I think the county is increasingly viewing APS as being frivolous with the significant money they get. As a taxpayer who has paid over $30k so far for schools that I havenât even used and am now wondering why we built 2 new elementary schools that apparently were never even needed, I am starting to agree. The increasing asks for the back office, such as real estate, paid holidays, and coaching staff, are the reason why we are not investing in the schools, and there is no assurance that additional money APS gets wonât go right to Syphax for things that do nothing to advance educational outcomes. |
Do you know how the system currently works? Capital improvements are funded via separate bonds, not out of the APS operating budget. |
And the repayments on bonds, including growing debt service, comes out of operating budget |
Such strong opinions for someone so totally clueless. |
You make not like what is known, but we know a lot. Did you attend or watch the APS PreCip table sessions July 31? Data from 3-4 plans or teams provided, including joint county. There are also references to guidance mandated by past CIPs, which involved lots of work. I'm not APS staff but I am so so tired of out-of-touch parents or residents who para hire into these debates across the county and assert nobody knows anything. Almost every single issue has been debated and mulled for years in this county. Swing space goes back at least a decade as the county mulled the VHC swap on Carlin Springs (which county decided to use for mental health and not APS.) the mandate to find swing space came out of last CIP. You probably don't know any of this (nor care) but please know other residents like me find your claims of "nobody knows anything). Advocate for your self interest all you want, but don't waste our time with straw man deflection. |
Well actually not the school operating fund technically but I take your overall point that the county should do more. I would not give the county any control over funding capital improvement projects though. Can you imagine needing to negotiate with the county when APS needs to upgrade a building or build a new one? the county won't even approve parking for schools these days. Instead, the county should just allocated more $ to APS. This gives APS more $ without giving up control. |