Kate's New Picture

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Weird there are no leaks tho


This is what gets me, too. I suspected DV for a while now, but I do find it hard to believe that there would be no leaks about it.

Very peculiar.


Are you suggesting that there is domestic violence in their marriage?


Yes. All over Europe press. Has been for years.
It’s the reason the brothers don’t speak.

Can anyone give any proof of this? Any?


This is from last year

https://amp.marca.com/en/lifestyle/uk-news/2023/04/18/643f113c268e3eee768b45ea.html

Insiders within the royal family have been divulging a lot of controversial information lately, and now a staff member has come forward with some truly shocking allegations. This person claims that Kate Middleton has been subjected to emotional and verbal abuse by her husband, Prince William. This revelation has caused quite a stir among royal watchers and the public alike.

The staff member, who has chosen to remain anonymous, has been working closely with the royal family and therefore has firsthand knowledge of the situation. According to the source, the alleged mistreatment has taken a toll on Kate Middleton's mental health, leaving her struggling to cope with the constant pressures of her royal duties and the challenges of maintaining a harmonious marriage.


Harry also said William has a temper, beat him up, then told him not to tell a soul.


There were rumors about him having a temper in school. I wouldn't be surprised. He's probably not nice to be around especially when stressed


If he takes after his dad. His father is a whiny spoiled man child. Have you seen the videos of him (Charles) having a tantrum when his pen didn’t work during a signing?
I saw that!! I can easily see him having similar tantrums. They sound exhausting to be around.


I have no problem believing these rumors of Will raging. I also don't think he really respects Kate. That video of him taking off with an umbrella into the rain, ditching her standing inside was awful. Harry helped her step down and walked with Kate under his umbrella and gestured to Will like, "WTF?" and Will just kept walking. I think they spend very little time together and what time they do spend he's a dick to her.


Ah, Harry, always a true "prince" to women himself, eh?

William has always been known to have a temper. To extrapolate that to DV or him having unalived her is ludicrous. As is the idea she is in a coma. Clearly false.


How is this clearly false? Someone with a temper can easily strike someone especially someone they see as weak and have zero respect for . William also was spotted with bruising around his neck weeks ago. We don’t know what happens behind the curtain but DV is more common than people think . It’s not just for poor people
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.


THIS.

The Queen put out a photo with an ADDED child and there was not this response.


Thank you. I know what’s ultimately pushing this thread and I’m personally so f——ng sick of it. I just hope those most responsible for this dynamic get what they deserve.


Link on the extra child? I can't find it.

/https://www.newsweek.com/royals-accused-photoshopping-queen-elizabeth-portrait-prince-louis-kate-middleton-1796268

Seems like just Louis was added.
But all the intrigue is in this link too.


Link doesn't work for me.


https://www.newsweek.com/royals-accused-photoshopping-queen-elizabeth-portrait-prince-louis-kate-middleton-1796268

So Kate does know how to drop in a new person via photoshop (and not well) and she knows how to say “this pic was taken last year” and we know it was unusual for her to add “2024” to the Mothers Day pic.

Dang, Kate.
All of the BRF is PR. How can they all be so bad at it?


This is my main fascination with it all.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

On a side note Kate is simply beautiful.

She is beautiful. But this face was likely shot in 2016 according to some press reports. See her Vogue cover 2016.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’ve never paid any attention to the royals and this mess is fascinating! I’m like 50% they are hashing out a divorce settlement, 50% she’s going to turn up after Easter as planned, looking happy, healthy, and beautiful, and never say a word about any of this.


All the royal insiders said shit would hit the fan once the Queen died . The Queen was highly respected and it was due to respect for her that everyone from Kate to royal press fell in line. The royal family will be no more . William has the same histrionic mental instability his mother had but it’s well hidden


My aunt was super into royals until the queen died. She doesn’t talk about them at all anymore. Charles doesn’t have the charm, and William isn’t looking much better.

I think people who are still diehard royal fans have missed the pivot that happened around them. This is the first time they’ve been confronted with this shift and of course they think it’s some targeted attack.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.


THIS.

The Queen put out a photo with an ADDED child and there was not this response.


Thank you. I know what’s ultimately pushing this thread and I’m personally so f——ng sick of it. I just hope those most responsible for this dynamic get what they deserve.


Link on the extra child? I can't find it.

/https://www.newsweek.com/royals-accused-photoshopping-queen-elizabeth-portrait-prince-louis-kate-middleton-1796268

Seems like just Louis was added.
But all the intrigue is in this link too.


Link doesn't work for me.


https://www.newsweek.com/royals-accused-photoshopping-queen-elizabeth-portrait-prince-louis-kate-middleton-1796268

So Kate does know how to drop in a new person via photoshop (and not well) and she knows how to say “this pic was taken last year” and we know it was unusual for her to add “2024” to the Mothers Day pic.

Dang, Kate.
All of the BRF is PR. How can they all be so bad at it?


This is my main fascination with it all.

Right?!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I’ve never paid any attention to the royals and this mess is fascinating! I’m like 50% they are hashing out a divorce settlement, 50% she’s going to turn up after Easter as planned, looking happy, healthy, and beautiful, and never say a word about any of this.


All the royal insiders said shit would hit the fan once the Queen died . The Queen was highly respected and it was due to respect for her that everyone from Kate to royal press fell in line. The royal family will be no more . William has the same histrionic mental instability his mother had but it’s well hidden


My aunt was super into royals until the queen died. She doesn’t talk about them at all anymore. Charles doesn’t have the charm, and William isn’t looking much better.

I think people who are still diehard royal fans have missed the pivot that happened around them. This is the first time they’ve been confronted with this shift and of course they think it’s some targeted attack.


Oh no, they lost the old American auntie support? This is dire.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

On a side note Kate is simply beautiful.

She is beautiful. But this face was likely shot in 2016 according to some press reports. See her Vogue cover 2016.

The Vogue story has some legs because of computer graphics capabilities— receipts.
Anonymous
Wow, we are page 134 on DCUM about the “photo” and Kate’s disappearance. This was never on my radar, but now everyone is talking about it.
Anonymous
Is there anything worse than a mother who takes her abusive son in laws side over her own daughter? Kates mom is despicable
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Is it significant that we only see her from the neck down?

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-68526972

Any conspiracy theories here?

This seems like a year ago!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

On a side note Kate is simply beautiful.

She is beautiful. But this face was likely shot in 2016 according to some press reports. See her Vogue cover 2016.

That might be why she looks so young/fresh.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Is there anything worse than a mother who takes her abusive son in laws side over her own daughter? Kates mom is despicable

What do you mean? Please elaborate.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.


I agree. Some folks on this thread seemed absolutely thrilled to play out some gruesome theories. Like, it’s not cool to be that excited about potential suicide attempts, eating disorders, paralysis, etc.


This. Absolutely remorseless and disgusting.


What do we have to be remorseful about? They created this unnecessary mess.


Seriously?


Why should people accept being lied to and manipulated by people in power? That would not be acceptable in any other country. Do you believe they are godly and therefore we should accept whatever they say even if it’s an obvious lie? That’s how abusive power is enabled. Transparency is important to prevent things like prince Andrews behavior. unchecked power invites corruption.


Yass qween, this is IMPORTANT because you’re a resident of the Commonwealth! Oh, no? Kay, so you work for an anti trafficking NGO!!! Wait, wuh? No again? Lay that DeToqueville on us gurl.

It’s not because you’re a lickspittle admirer of a recent South Park target. I know!!


Mental illness on full display above.


all because the family's staff suck at photoshoping
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.


I agree. Some folks on this thread seemed absolutely thrilled to play out some gruesome theories. Like, it’s not cool to be that excited about potential suicide attempts, eating disorders, paralysis, etc.


This. Absolutely remorseless and disgusting.


What do we have to be remorseful about? They created this unnecessary mess.


Seriously?


Why should people accept being lied to and manipulated by people in power? That would not be acceptable in any other country. Do you believe they are godly and therefore we should accept whatever they say even if it’s an obvious lie? That’s how abusive power is enabled. Transparency is important to prevent things like prince Andrews behavior. unchecked power invites corruption.


Yass qween, this is IMPORTANT because you’re a resident of the Commonwealth! Oh, no? Kay, so you work for an anti trafficking NGO!!! Wait, wuh? No again? Lay that DeToqueville on us gurl.

It’s not because you’re a lickspittle admirer of a recent South Park target. I know!!


Mental illness on full display above.


all because the family's staff suck at photoshoping

Too much scrutiny. Shouldn't have even been attempted.
Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Go to: