Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there anything worse than a mother who takes her abusive son in laws side over her own daughter? Kates mom is despicable

What do you mean? Please elaborate.

It means PP is damaged and thinks she knows Kate’s mom. I wouldn’t recommend interacting with this kind of duchess-rimming she-beast without a taser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On a side note Kate is simply beautiful.

You do realize that’s her head photoshopped from the magazine cover. https://pagesix.com/2024/03/11/royal-family/fan-suspects-kate-middleton-used-2016-vogue-cover-to-create-botched-post-surgery-photo/amp/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never paid any attention to the royals and this mess is fascinating! I’m like 50% they are hashing out a divorce settlement, 50% she’s going to turn up after Easter as planned, looking happy, healthy, and beautiful, and never say a word about any of this.

All the royal insiders said shit would hit the fan once the Queen died . The Queen was highly respected and it was due to respect for her that everyone from Kate to royal press fell in line. The royal family will be no more . William has the same histrionic mental instability his mother had but it’s well hidden

My aunt was super into royals until the queen died. She doesn’t talk about them at all anymore. Charles doesn’t have the charm, and William isn’t looking much better.

I think people who are still diehard royal fans have missed the pivot that happened around them. This is the first time they’ve been confronted with this shift and of course they think it’s some targeted attack.[/quote] That's happening right here in this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On a side note Kate is simply beautiful.

You do realize that’s her head photoshopped from the magazine cover. https://pagesix.com/2024/03/11/royal-family/fan-suspects-kate-middleton-used-2016-vogue-cover-to-create-botched-post-surgery-photo/amp/

Wow!! Spot on and exact. Still she was/is gorgeous. Not surprised that face photo was allegedly used.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.

I agree. Some folks on this thread seemed absolutely thrilled to play out some gruesome theories. Like, it’s not cool to be that excited about potential suicide attempts, eating disorders, paralysis, etc.

This. Absolutely remorseless and disgusting.

What do we have to be remorseful about? They created this unnecessary mess.

Seriously?

Why should people accept being lied to and manipulated by people in power? That would not be acceptable in any other country. Do you believe they are godly and therefore we should accept whatever they say even if it’s an obvious lie? That’s how abusive power is enabled. Transparency is important to prevent things like prince Andrews behavior. unchecked power invites corruption.

Yass qween, this is IMPORTANT because you’re a resident of the Commonwealth! Oh, no? Kay, so you work for an anti trafficking NGO!!! Wait, wuh? No again? Lay that DeToqueville on us gurl.

It’s not because you’re a lickspittle admirer of a recent South Park target. I know!!

Mental illness on full display above.

all because the family's staff suck at photoshoping

Clearly Kate photoshopped it because she for whatever reason did not want to take a photo for Mothers Day this year. No photo at all would have been better than her changing sweater colors and editing out children’s bracelets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.

I agree. Some folks on this thread seemed absolutely thrilled to play out some gruesome theories. Like, it’s not cool to be that excited about potential suicide attempts, eating disorders, paralysis, etc.

This. Absolutely remorseless and disgusting.

What do we have to be remorseful about? They created this unnecessary mess.

Seriously?

Why should people accept being lied to and manipulated by people in power? That would not be acceptable in any other country. Do you believe they are godly and therefore we should accept whatever they say even if it’s an obvious lie? That’s how abusive power is enabled. Transparency is important to prevent things like prince Andrews behavior. unchecked power invites corruption.

Yass qween, this is IMPORTANT because you’re a resident of the Commonwealth! Oh, no? Kay, so you work for an anti trafficking NGO!!! Wait, wuh? No again? Lay that DeToqueville on us gurl.

It’s not because you’re a lickspittle admirer of a recent South Park target. I know!!

Mental illness on full display above.

all because the family's staff suck at photoshoping

Clearly Kate photoshopped it because she for whatever reason did not want to take a photo for Mothers Day this year. No photo at all would have been better than her changing sweater colors and editing out children’s bracelets.

Also why not use a more current face photo?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On a side note Kate is simply beautiful.

She still looks 35, tops.

DP. And here’s what I find disturbing about Kate’s DCUM stans: “She’s beautiful,” and “she looks 35 tops.”

Even if we agree she can look good,
1. She probably has anorexia/bulimia to help her look ”good” at least to you, and
2. Her looks, good or bad, have absolutely nothing to do with whatever is going on right now in the BRF, and
3. Her looks, good or bad, have no bearing on whether anybody can/should question a blatant disinformation campaign, including who’s behind it and why.

You guys slobbering over her (probably bulimic) looks says a lot about how you have mentality of a tween.

[Anonymous]

Sorry if this was covered 100 pages ago, but was this year’s Mother’s Day staged at all similarly to those from the past? Meaning is it usually just her with the kids?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there anything worse than a mother who takes her abusive son in laws side over her own daughter? Kates mom is despicable

What do you mean? Please elaborate.

It means PP is damaged and thinks she knows Kate’s mom. I wouldn’t recommend interacting with this kind of duchess-rimming she-beast without a taser.

If you pearl clutchers do not learn to unclench and breathe , get out of the thread. Why are you here? The thread is a speculatory gossip thread for royal watchers but some of you want to censor what gossip is posted like you’re the royal guard.

Anybody who’s followed this sorry tale knows Kates mom sold Kate down the river and wanted Will like a sow at the trough .

She’s the one who pushed her to stay with him and seal the deal.

Even despite the family snubbing her, looking down at the flight attendant and calling her classist names , Kates mom still wants her daughter to be Queen. She doesn’t care if her daughter is miserable

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On a side note Kate is simply beautiful.

You do realize that’s her head photoshopped from the magazine cover. https://pagesix.com/2024/03/11/royal-family/fan-suspects-kate-middleton-used-2016-vogue-cover-to-create-botched-post-surgery-photo/amp/

This part makes less sense than everything else. Why? If they’re just using a Fall 2023 picture, why edit the face?

[Anonymous]

If folks are trying to get the thread shut down keep it up with the deranged posts and personal insults.

If you want to be able to keep the discussion going as new events unfold, don't feed the trolls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On a side note Kate is simply beautiful.

You do realize that’s her head photoshopped from the magazine cover. https://pagesix.com/2024/03/11/royal-family/fan-suspects-kate-middleton-used-2016-vogue-cover-to-create-botched-post-surgery-photo/amp/

Definitely the same person in both those shots for sure

[Anonymous]

You ghouls don't know how to play nice do you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is there anything worse than a mother who takes her abusive son in laws side over her own daughter? Kates mom is despicable

What do you mean? Please elaborate.

It means PP is damaged and thinks she knows Kate’s mom. I wouldn’t recommend interacting with this kind of duchess-rimming she-beast without a taser.

If you pearl clutchers do not learn to unclench and breathe , get out of the thread. Why are you here? The thread is a speculatory gossip thread for royal watchers but some of you want to censor what gossip is posted like you’re the royal guard.

Anybody who’s followed this sorry tale knows Kates mom sold Kate down the river and wanted Will like a sow at the trough .

She’s the one who pushed her to stay with him and seal the deal.

Even despite the family snubbing her, looking down at the flight attendant and calling her classist names , Kates mom still wants her daughter to be Queen. She doesn’t care if her daughter is miserable

Hmmm. I wonder why this strikes me as a terribly misogynistic response? What could it be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On a side note Kate is simply beautiful.

She is beautiful. But this face was likely shot in 2016 according to some press reports. See her Vogue cover 2016.

The Vogue story has some legs because of computer graphics capabilities— receipts.

And…it’s a copyright violation. It’s all just so bizarre.