Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.

I agree. Some folks on this thread seemed absolutely thrilled to play out some gruesome theories. Like, it’s not cool to be that excited about potential suicide attempts, eating disorders, paralysis, etc.

This. Absolutely remorseless and disgusting.

What do we have to be remorseful about? They created this unnecessary mess.

DP. It’s fine. You do you. If it is exciting to you that Kate may have been abused or attempted suicide or whatever specific theory you are pushing, then cool. But for the normal people, it’s not exciting fan fic to imagine her with her head blown off…

Your attempt at gaslighting is not working.

Ok, can you explain how I’m gaslighting? Because I’m not trying to! Obviously something is amiss with Kate Middleton. And most of us are just trying to figure it out, and gossip, and that’s what this forum is about! But there’s a subset of people on here who are like, actually legitimately excited about pushing super random theories. Like the PP who suggested that Kate Middleton shot herself in the face and is now disfigured. And then another poster was like, yeah! That’s be awesome!

And statistically speaking, that’s so, so unlikely that a woman would (1) choose that method, (2) have a gun available and (3) survive. So maybe, just maybe, posters like that need to look at why they’d push such an unlikely theory, and why they get excited about it.

But I am legitimately interested in hearing how I am gaslighting so I don’t do it in the future.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why PP want us to be remorseful for other people’s actions.

Agree it's mystifying. Perhaps to keep the drama going?

People wanted a proof of life photo and got it, yet, cannot let it go until after Easter.

Not proof of life if you can’t see her face.
Just pouring more fuel on the fire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why PP want us to be remorseful for other people’s actions.

Agree it's mystifying. Perhaps to keep the drama going?

People wanted a proof of life photo and got it, yet, cannot let it go until after Easter.

Not proof of life if you can’t see her face.
Just pouring more fuel on the fire.

There was a face pic the other day and y'all didn't like that either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.

THIS.

The Queen put out a photo with an ADDED child and there was not this response.

Wait, Camilla did what?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.

THIS.

The Queen put out a photo with an ADDED child and there was not this response.

Thank you. I know what’s ultimately pushing this thread and I’m personally so f——ng sick of it. I just hope those most responsible for this dynamic get what they deserve.

Link on the extra child? I can't find it.

/https://www.newsweek.com/royals-accused-photoshopping-queen-elizabeth-portrait-prince-louis-kate-middleton-1796268

Seems like just Louis was added.
But all the intrigue is in this link too.

Link doesn't work for me.

https://www.newsweek.com/royals-accused-photoshopping-queen-elizabeth-portrait-prince-louis-kate-middleton-1796268

So Kate does know how to drop in a new person via photoshop (and not well) and she knows how to say “this pic was taken last year” and we know it was unusual for her to add “2024” to the Mothers Day pic.

Dang, Kate.
All of the BRF is PR. How can they all be so bad at it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

On a side note Kate is simply beautiful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why PP want us to be remorseful for other people’s actions.

Agree it's mystifying. Perhaps to keep the drama going?

People wanted a proof of life photo and got it, yet, cannot let it go until after Easter.

Not proof of life if you can’t see her face.
Just pouring more fuel on the fire.

There was a face pic the other day and y'all didn't like that either.

The fake photoshopped one? That “Kate” apologized for?
Come on, this is a freaking fiasco of epic proportions. It’s a PR train wreck and simply mystifying that KP could eff it up to this extent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On a side note Kate is simply beautiful.

Yes the Vogue photographer did a great job on that pic years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never paid any attention to the royals and this mess is fascinating! I’m like 50% they are hashing out a divorce settlement, 50% she’s going to turn up after Easter as planned, looking happy, healthy, and beautiful, and never say a word about any of this.

All the royal insiders said shit would hit the fan once the Queen died . The Queen was highly respected and it was due to respect for her that everyone from Kate to royal press fell in line. The royal family will be no more . William has the same histrionic mental instability his mother had but it’s well hidden

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harry is also a hot head and there are rumors he has beaten hookers. William confines himself to words.

No, he doesn’t. Harry describes a fight that William turned physical in his book. No lawsuit for libel, so there you have it.

Is this the same book where the Dutch translation "accidentally" named Kate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never paid any attention to the royals and this mess is fascinating! I’m like 50% they are hashing out a divorce settlement, 50% she’s going to turn up after Easter as planned, looking happy, healthy, and beautiful, and never say a word about any of this.

All the royal insiders said shit would hit the fan once the Queen died . The Queen was highly respected and it was due to respect for her that everyone from Kate to royal press fell in line. The royal family will be no more . William has the same histrionic mental instability his mother had but it’s well hidden

So does Harry. Kate introduced some very needed genes for stability and emotional IQ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

On a side note Kate is simply beautiful.

She still looks 35, tops.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never paid any attention to the royals and this mess is fascinating! I’m like 50% they are hashing out a divorce settlement, 50% she’s going to turn up after Easter as planned, looking happy, healthy, and beautiful, and never say a word about any of this.

All the royal insiders said shit would hit the fan once the Queen died . The Queen was highly respected and it was due to respect for her that everyone from Kate to royal press fell in line. The royal family will be no more . William has the same histrionic mental instability his mother had but it’s well hidden

I wonder if they can start the long process of retreating from as large of a public presence that they have. Model themselves after the lower key royal families? I mean, how much do we ever hear about the Swedish Royals but for the Nobel banquet? If I were William, that is what I’d dedicate my life to for the sake of my kids. Just reeling it all in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never paid any attention to the royals and this mess is fascinating! I’m like 50% they are hashing out a divorce settlement, 50% she’s going to turn up after Easter as planned, looking happy, healthy, and beautiful, and never say a word about any of this.

All the royal insiders said shit would hit the fan once the Queen died . The Queen was highly respected and it was due to respect for her that everyone from Kate to royal press fell in line. The royal family will be no more . William has the same histrionic mental instability his mother had but it’s well hidden

I wonder if they can start the long process of retreating from as large of a public presence that they have. Model themselves after the lower key royal families? I mean, how much do we ever hear about the Swedish Royals but for the Nobel banquet? If I were William, that is what I’d dedicate my life to for the sake of my kids. Just reeling it all in.

But why would you think they would want to do that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve never paid any attention to the royals and this mess is fascinating! I’m like 50% they are hashing out a divorce settlement, 50% she’s going to turn up after Easter as planned, looking happy, healthy, and beautiful, and never say a word about any of this.

All the royal insiders said shit would hit the fan once the Queen died . The Queen was highly respected and it was due to respect for her that everyone from Kate to royal press fell in line. The royal family will be no more . William has the same histrionic mental instability his mother had but it’s well hidden

Oh please. The "royal insiders" aren't saying that.