Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.

THIS.

The Queen put out a photo with an ADDED child and there was not this response.

Thank you. I know what’s ultimately pushing this thread and I’m personally so f——ng sick of it. I just hope those most responsible for this dynamic get what they deserve.

Link on the extra child? I can't find it.

/https://www.newsweek.com/royals-accused-photoshopping-queen-elizabeth-portrait-prince-louis-kate-middleton-1796268

Seems like just Louis was added.
But all the intrigue is in this link too.

Link doesn't work for me.

https://www.newsweek.com/royals-accused-photoshopping-queen-elizabeth-portrait-prince-louis-kate-middleton-1796268

So Kate does know how to drop in a new person via photoshop (and not well) and she knows how to say “this pic was taken last year” and we know it was unusual for her to add “2024” to the Mothers Day pic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what types of things would she be trying to get in negotiations? $, a separate house?

Everything not provided to Diana. Did Diana have protection? A paid for support staff? Homes of her choice. 50/50 custody. Could be anything

I think she’s trying to ensure George and Charlotte aren’t sent to boarding school.

SHE went to boarding school herself. Doubt that is true. She and William have been looking at schools for George (co-ed, presumably all may attend).

It’s been pretty widely reported she didn’t want them to go to boarding school. Is there no part of your childhood you would prefer to not repeat with your children?

It is the norm in their set.

Their lives are not like yours and mine.

They have been actively looking at schools.

And there has been active reporting that they have argued strenuously about it. Two months after they make a “joint decision” Kate disappears on a strike. Coincidence or conspiracy?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.

I agree. Some folks on this thread seemed absolutely thrilled to play out some gruesome theories. Like, it’s not cool to be that excited about potential suicide attempts, eating disorders, paralysis, etc.

This. Absolutely remorseless and disgusting.

What do we have to be remorseful about? They created this unnecessary mess.

Seriously?

Why should people accept being lied to and manipulated by people in power? That would not be acceptable in any other country. Do you believe they are godly and therefore we should accept whatever they say even if it’s an obvious lie? That’s how abusive power is enabled. Transparency is important to prevent things like prince Andrews behavior. unchecked power invites corruption.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A good article about "choose-your-own-reality information dystopia," which is a cultural mindset that scares the hell out of me:

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2024/03/kate-middleton-mothers-day-photo-fake/677718/

Dang, it’s blocked for me. Looks like an interesting article!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.

THIS.

The Queen put out a photo with an ADDED child and there was not this response.

Thank you. I know what’s ultimately pushing this thread and I’m personally so f——ng sick of it. I just hope those most responsible for this dynamic get what they deserve.

Link on the extra child? I can't find it.

/https://www.newsweek.com/royals-accused-photoshopping-queen-elizabeth-portrait-prince-louis-kate-middleton-1796268

Seems like just Louis was added.
But all the intrigue is in this link too.

Link doesn't work for me.

Oh, just ONE CHILD WAS ADDED, I mean, it's not like it was TWO, amirite?!!!

You’re trite and tiresome. And why do you keep bumping this thread so 5 people have to tell you this with each one of your obvious posts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what types of things would she be trying to get in negotiations? $, a separate house?

Everything not provided to Diana. Did Diana have protection? A paid for support staff? Homes of her choice. 50/50 custody. Could be anything

I think she’s trying to ensure George and Charlotte aren’t sent to boarding school.

SHE went to boarding school herself. Doubt that is true. She and William have been looking at schools for George (co-ed, presumably all may attend).

It’s been pretty widely reported she didn’t want them to go to boarding school. Is there no part of your childhood you would prefer to not repeat with your children?

It is the norm in their set.

Their lives are not like yours and mine.

They have been actively looking at schools.

It’s so cool having an upper crusty crusty like you here with all that insider info.

It has been reported in the media. Why has this board been flooded with trolls and low information posters?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.

I agree. Some folks on this thread seemed absolutely thrilled to play out some gruesome theories. Like, it’s not cool to be that excited about potential suicide attempts, eating disorders, paralysis, etc.

This. Absolutely remorseless and disgusting.

What do we have to be remorseful about? They created this unnecessary mess.

Seriously?

Why should people accept being lied to and manipulated by people in power? That would not be acceptable in any other country. Do you believe they are godly and therefore we should accept whatever they say even if it’s an obvious lie? That’s how abusive power is enabled. Transparency is important to prevent things like prince Andrews behavior. unchecked power invites corruption.

Ha. It happens all the time in the US. Wake up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.

THIS.

The Queen put out a photo with an ADDED child and there was not this response.

Thank you. I know what’s ultimately pushing this thread and I’m personally so f——ng sick of it. I just hope those most responsible for this dynamic get what they deserve.

Link on the extra child? I can't find it.

/https://www.newsweek.com/royals-accused-photoshopping-queen-elizabeth-portrait-prince-louis-kate-middleton-1796268

Seems like just Louis was added.
But all the intrigue is in this link too.

Link doesn't work for me.

Oh, just ONE CHILD WAS ADDED, I mean, it's not like it was TWO, amirite?!!!

You’re trite and tiresome. And why do you keep bumping this thread so 5 people have to tell you this with each one of your obvious posts?

Lol, interacting with you brings joy to my day, PP.

[Anonymous]

I don’t know why PP want us to be remorseful for other people’s actions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what types of things would she be trying to get in negotiations? $, a separate house?

Everything not provided to Diana. Did Diana have protection? A paid for support staff? Homes of her choice. 50/50 custody. Could be anything

I think she’s trying to ensure George and Charlotte aren’t sent to boarding school.

SHE went to boarding school herself. Doubt that is true. She and William have been looking at schools for George (co-ed, presumably all may attend).

It’s been pretty widely reported she didn’t want them to go to boarding school. Is there no part of your childhood you would prefer to not repeat with your children?

It is the norm in their set.

Their lives are not like yours and mine.

They have been actively looking at schools.

And there has been active reporting that they have argued strenuously about it. Two months after they make a “joint decision” Kate disappears on a strike. Coincidence or conspiracy?

Time will tell. I'd be very surprised if they don't at least board during the week.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.

I agree. Some folks on this thread seemed absolutely thrilled to play out some gruesome theories. Like, it’s not cool to be that excited about potential suicide attempts, eating disorders, paralysis, etc.

This. Absolutely remorseless and disgusting.

What do we have to be remorseful about? They created this unnecessary mess.

DP. It’s fine. You do you. If it is exciting to you that Kate may have been abused or attempted suicide or whatever specific theory you are pushing, then cool. But for the normal people, it’s not exciting fan fic to imagine her with her head blown off…

Your attempt at gaslighting is not working.

It's hard to distinguish between the trolls and those who are not grounded in reality. We can all see it is you who is gaslighting PP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.

I agree. Some folks on this thread seemed absolutely thrilled to play out some gruesome theories. Like, it’s not cool to be that excited about potential suicide attempts, eating disorders, paralysis, etc.

This. Absolutely remorseless and disgusting.

What do we have to be remorseful about? They created this unnecessary mess.

Seriously?

Why should people accept being lied to and manipulated by people in power? That would not be acceptable in any other country. Do you believe they are godly and therefore we should accept whatever they say even if it’s an obvious lie? That’s how abusive power is enabled. Transparency is important to prevent things like prince Andrews behavior. unchecked power invites corruption.

Ha. It happens all the time in the US. Wake up.

It's not unique to the US

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know why PP want us to be remorseful for other people’s actions.

Agree it's mystifying. Perhaps to keep the drama going?

People wanted a proof of life photo and got it, yet, cannot let it go until after Easter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would people be Zaprudering this picture if there wasn’t a virulent group of trolls attacking Kate and William online for everything to “protect” their preferred couple? You all really think a movement that produced rictus-faced Omid Scobie (where he said he couldn’t confirm the affair rumor) would leave Kate alone? Interesting.

I agree. Some folks on this thread seemed absolutely thrilled to play out some gruesome theories. Like, it’s not cool to be that excited about potential suicide attempts, eating disorders, paralysis, etc.

This. Absolutely remorseless and disgusting.

What do we have to be remorseful about? They created this unnecessary mess.

Seriously?

Why should people accept being lied to and manipulated by people in power? That would not be acceptable in any other country. Do you believe they are godly and therefore we should accept whatever they say even if it’s an obvious lie? That’s how abusive power is enabled. Transparency is important to prevent things like prince Andrews behavior. unchecked power invites corruption.

Yass qween, this is IMPORTANT because you’re a resident of the Commonwealth! Oh, no? Kay, so you work for an anti trafficking NGO!!! Wait, wuh? No again? Lay that DeToqueville on us gurl.

It’s not because you’re a lickspittle admirer of a recent South Park target. I know!!