BRYC talk

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As bad as a showing BRYC boys have had in ECNL. You would think they would have a super Y team just to attract new talent in. The fact that their TD is using to rake in the money at his own NVUFV shows how dysfunctional things are at BRYC. He has 2 BRYC coaches coaching super Y. If Im BRYC Im furious this clown is using our talent under his clubs name.

How tiny is your wanker that you have to go on here and berate a youth soccer club with every ridiculous thing you can dream up?

The PP does ask a legitimate question. Why wouldn’t you bring the Super Y program to BRYC where you’re the TD at?

Do you have a kid who plays on NVU Super Y? I do, and he did not come from BRYC. Nor do at least half of the kids on the team.

[Anonymous]

Guess the rumored merger between BRYC and FCV is off-they partnered with Viva instead.

[Anonymous]

It is clear to me that BW filled the void for Super Y since BRYC directors do not want to do anything in summer, the same as rec soccer.
BRYC directors may feel those volunteers need a break during the summer. Remember they use the same organizational structure for their rec activities, covering much more kids.

NVU playing Super Y may hurt BW's regular summer camp business since kids may opt-out from BW's summer camp if they are doing Super Y. Give and Take, I think he is break-even.

BRYC and NVU are 2 different entities.

[Anonymous]

Isn't BRYC rec a separate entity though? .org vs .com

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Isn't BRYC rec a separate entity though? .org vs .com

Yes, PP is ignorant.

[Anonymous]

Who partnered with viva

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
It is clear to me that BW filled the void for Super Y since BRYC directors do not want to do anything in summer, the same as rec soccer.
BRYC directors may feel those volunteers need a break during the summer. Remember they use the same organizational structure for their rec activities, covering much more kids.

NVU playing Super Y may hurt BW's regular summer camp business since kids may opt-out from BW's summer camp if they are doing Super Y. Give and Take, I think he is break-even.

BRYC and NVU are 2 different entities.

The conflict is They work for one club and own a competing club and yes by offering super y in the age groups they do it is theoretically a direct competing club. So there is the conflict of interest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It is clear to me that BW filled the void for Super Y since BRYC directors do not want to do anything in summer, the same as rec soccer.
BRYC directors may feel those volunteers need a break during the summer. Remember they use the same organizational structure for their rec activities, covering much more kids.

NVU playing Super Y may hurt BW's regular summer camp business since kids may opt-out from BW's summer camp if they are doing Super Y. Give and Take, I think he is break-even.

BRYC and NVU are 2 different entities.

The conflict is They work for one club and own a competing club and yes by offering super y in the age groups they do it is theoretically a direct competing club. So there is the conflict of interest.

If BRYC doesn't run Super Y then there is no conflict. Super Y is considered club agnostic in regard to players and can be so with clubs as well. Why are you so bent out of shape by this? If BRYC wants to do Super Y they can. This is no different than NOVA Majestic and McLean.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It is clear to me that BW filled the void for Super Y since BRYC directors do not want to do anything in summer, the same as rec soccer.
BRYC directors may feel those volunteers need a break during the summer. Remember they use the same organizational structure for their rec activities, covering much more kids.

NVU playing Super Y may hurt BW's regular summer camp business since kids may opt-out from BW's summer camp if they are doing Super Y. Give and Take, I think he is break-even.

BRYC and NVU are 2 different entities.

The conflict is They work for one club and own a competing club and yes by offering super y in the age groups they do it is theoretically a direct competing club. So there is the conflict of interest.

If BRYC doesn't run Super Y then there is no conflict. Super Y is considered club agnostic in regard to players and can be so with clubs as well. Why are you so bent out of shape by this? If BRYC wants to do Super Y they can. This is no different than NOVA Majestic and McLean.

The difference is the Mclean coaches and TD dont own Majestic. Where as the Bryc coaches and TD own NVUFC. To avoid the conflict of interest NVUFC should not be allowed to have BRYC players play for their club. That way you eliminate the conflict of interest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guess the rumored merger between BRYC and FCV is off-they partnered with Viva instead.

I haven’t seen anything announced. Where did you see it or is rumors?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It is clear to me that BW filled the void for Super Y since BRYC directors do not want to do anything in summer, the same as rec soccer.
BRYC directors may feel those volunteers need a break during the summer. Remember they use the same organizational structure for their rec activities, covering much more kids.

NVU playing Super Y may hurt BW's regular summer camp business since kids may opt-out from BW's summer camp if they are doing Super Y. Give and Take, I think he is break-even.

BRYC and NVU are 2 different entities.

The conflict is They work for one club and own a competing club and yes by offering super y in the age groups they do it is theoretically a direct competing club. So there is the conflict of interest.

If BRYC doesn't run Super Y then there is no conflict. Super Y is considered club agnostic in regard to players and can be so with clubs as well. Why are you so bent out of shape by this? If BRYC wants to do Super Y they can. This is no different than NOVA Majestic and McLean.

The difference is the Mclean coaches and TD dont own Majestic. Where as the Bryc coaches and TD own NVUFC. To avoid the conflict of interest NVUFC should not be allowed to have BRYC players play for their club. That way you eliminate the conflict of interest.

NVUFC does not conflict with BRYC if NVUFC only does Super Y. You need to get a life. If BRYC doesn't have a problem with it you certainly shouldn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It is clear to me that BW filled the void for Super Y since BRYC directors do not want to do anything in summer, the same as rec soccer.
BRYC directors may feel those volunteers need a break during the summer. Remember they use the same organizational structure for their rec activities, covering much more kids.

NVU playing Super Y may hurt BW's regular summer camp business since kids may opt-out from BW's summer camp if they are doing Super Y. Give and Take, I think he is break-even.

BRYC and NVU are 2 different entities.

The conflict is They work for one club and own a competing club and yes by offering super y in the age groups they do it is theoretically a direct competing club. So there is the conflict of interest.

If BRYC doesn't run Super Y then there is no conflict. Super Y is considered club agnostic in regard to players and can be so with clubs as well. Why are you so bent out of shape by this? If BRYC wants to do Super Y they can. This is no different than NOVA Majestic and McLean.

The difference is the Mclean coaches and TD dont own Majestic. Where as the Bryc coaches and TD own NVUFC. To avoid the conflict of interest NVUFC should not be allowed to have BRYC players play for their club. That way you eliminate the conflict of interest.

Super Y is not the issue or at least is not much different than other Clubs. The issue on the Boys side is the training and programs through Welsh Soccer and previously through BW Advanced. I know that several BRYC families have felt paying for additional Welsh family & friends supplemental training was part of the price of business of playing at BRYC. You can compare it to HP Elite if you want but I have never heard similar complaints from PWSI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It is clear to me that BW filled the void for Super Y since BRYC directors do not want to do anything in summer, the same as rec soccer.
BRYC directors may feel those volunteers need a break during the summer. Remember they use the same organizational structure for their rec activities, covering much more kids.

NVU playing Super Y may hurt BW's regular summer camp business since kids may opt-out from BW's summer camp if they are doing Super Y. Give and Take, I think he is break-even.

BRYC and NVU are 2 different entities.

The conflict is They work for one club and own a competing club and yes by offering super y in the age groups they do it is theoretically a direct competing club. So there is the conflict of interest.

If BRYC doesn't run Super Y then there is no conflict. Super Y is considered club agnostic in regard to players and can be so with clubs as well. Why are you so bent out of shape by this? If BRYC wants to do Super Y they can. This is no different than NOVA Majestic and McLean.

The difference is the Mclean coaches and TD dont own Majestic. Where as the Bryc coaches and TD own NVUFC. To avoid the conflict of interest NVUFC should not be allowed to have BRYC players play for their club. That way you eliminate the conflict of interest.

NVUFC does not conflict with BRYC if NVUFC only does Super Y. You need to get a life. If BRYC doesn't have a problem with it you certainly shouldn't.

Its another example of the grimy back channels of youth sport. Same goes for a HS coaches should not be allowed to coach youth soccer at the same time. It sets up a pathway for recruiting. Tons of conflict there. if you cant see it and openly say you dont see the conflict youre part of the problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It is clear to me that BW filled the void for Super Y since BRYC directors do not want to do anything in summer, the same as rec soccer.
BRYC directors may feel those volunteers need a break during the summer. Remember they use the same organizational structure for their rec activities, covering much more kids.

NVU playing Super Y may hurt BW's regular summer camp business since kids may opt-out from BW's summer camp if they are doing Super Y. Give and Take, I think he is break-even.

BRYC and NVU are 2 different entities.

The conflict is They work for one club and own a competing club and yes by offering super y in the age groups they do it is theoretically a direct competing club. So there is the conflict of interest.

If BRYC doesn't run Super Y then there is no conflict. Super Y is considered club agnostic in regard to players and can be so with clubs as well. Why are you so bent out of shape by this? If BRYC wants to do Super Y they can. This is no different than NOVA Majestic and McLean.

The difference is the Mclean coaches and TD dont own Majestic. Where as the Bryc coaches and TD own NVUFC. To avoid the conflict of interest NVUFC should not be allowed to have BRYC players play for their club. That way you eliminate the conflict of interest.

NVUFC does not conflict with BRYC if NVUFC only does Super Y. You need to get a life. If BRYC doesn't have a problem with it you certainly shouldn't.

Its another example of the grimy back channels of youth sport. Same goes for a HS coaches should not be allowed to coach youth soccer at the same time. It sets up a pathway for recruiting. Tons of conflict there. if you cant see it and openly say you dont see the conflict youre part of the problem.

It is summer soccer, who cares.

Seriously, find another activity for your kid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It is clear to me that BW filled the void for Super Y since BRYC directors do not want to do anything in summer, the same as rec soccer.
BRYC directors may feel those volunteers need a break during the summer. Remember they use the same organizational structure for their rec activities, covering much more kids.

NVU playing Super Y may hurt BW's regular summer camp business since kids may opt-out from BW's summer camp if they are doing Super Y. Give and Take, I think he is break-even.

BRYC and NVU are 2 different entities.

The conflict is They work for one club and own a competing club and yes by offering super y in the age groups they do it is theoretically a direct competing club. So there is the conflict of interest.

If BRYC doesn't run Super Y then there is no conflict. Super Y is considered club agnostic in regard to players and can be so with clubs as well. Why are you so bent out of shape by this? If BRYC wants to do Super Y they can. This is no different than NOVA Majestic and McLean.

The difference is the Mclean coaches and TD dont own Majestic. Where as the Bryc coaches and TD own NVUFC. To avoid the conflict of interest NVUFC should not be allowed to have BRYC players play for their club. That way you eliminate the conflict of interest.

Super Y is not the issue or at least is not much different than other Clubs. The issue on the Boys side is the training and programs through Welsh Soccer and previously through BW Advanced. I know that several BRYC families have felt paying for additional Welsh family & friends supplemental training was part of the price of business of playing at BRYC. You can compare it to HP Elite if you want but I have never heard similar complaints from PWSI.

+100