| if something was plantation themed that’s obviously a terrible idea and racist but period dress for women of the civil war era could be wives of northern soldiers, no? Antebellum refers to the southern houses, dresses, etc general but civil war doesn’t mean that right? |
No one normal would. |
Axe is grinding |
The teacher’s post only said that they were having “a little fun with dress up before shooting Civil war videos.” I’m sure there is an appropriate history lesson that was in there about the civil war. But no, kids shouldn’t be taught that civil war dress up is fun. She lost me there and I would have been mortified if my kid was in the photos. They lost me further when they took them down without public accountability. They know they screwed up but have failed to say so (outside the school walls). |
Uhhh pointing out that it is also cringeworthy if they asked girls to dress up as wives. |
Well they weren’t soldiers in the vast majority of cases yet they did exist and contribute to the war effort and society. At any rate I don’t think period dress is awful for school projects/skits but certainly would have specified they weren’t confederates. |
Was that style of dress typical of Northern women? It was clearly to evoke Southern Belles. Note that it isn’t a thing outside of the South for sororities to have “Old North” parties. |
Hmmm so following your logic, any non-white kids in the class would have been cast ... how? If the point is re-enactment for a school project, you don’t have to type cast kids into the roles they would have literally had during the 1860s, right? |
That’s right. The NPR quote linked earlier had a great paragraph that explains why this is problematic. “Civil rights activists have criticized these kinds of parties for many years, noting that they elevate the beauty of the Old South's plantations while erasing their roots in the bondage and brutal oppression of Black slaves. It's similar to the denialism among some who seek to honor symbols of the Confederacy while downplaying or ignoring its role in fighting to maintain slavery.” Those were absolutely “Old South” dresses and it is appalling that kids were asked to dress in them for any purpose. If the dresses belonged to the school, I hope they’ve now been removed. |
When I see three parties, the girls/women always seem to be dressed like the opening scene in gone with the wind or like 80s prom dresses. But when I see black and white photos of actual women from the 1860s they are typically wearing much more modest dress. (Maybe more like what homely Melanie wore in GWTW.). Anyway, it seems like those dumb off the shoulder ruffled silk tings are just another way to try to make the antebellum south seem more beautiful than it was in reality. Everyone was just a Scarlet O’Hara type with men bringing them plates of barbecue! |
This is correct, which makes a history teacher asking kids to dress in that attire even more odd. |
|
Oh god, lay off the teacher. We have zero context and are just zipping off "shallow optics", while claiming to want to foster a love of learning in children.
Otherwise, this silly thread is the gift that keeps on giving. "HOS dressed as Pharaoh.." made my day yesterday! |
|
For a group that is supposed to be tolerant, I see nothing in this thread but intolerance and blowing something out of proportion. Was Pharaoh a stupid super hero costume? Definitely, Spiderman is a Super Hero, not Pharaoh. But please, stop being so toxic and looking for problems where they do not exist.
The school is putting an a huge fundraiser and a lot of volunteers have invested time and effort into making it a great event - give them some slack. |
I mean, a lot of Jews do. Not all Egyptian imagery but Pharaohs and pyramids definitely evoke the story of Passover. Which is not to say one has to automatically make the connection to how the HOS dressed, just that for Jews it's not beyond the pale. That's the part of Egypt we hear about most. We hear it every year, in fact! And yeah, as Jews, any time someone mentions a world war or a war in Europe, the mind automatically skips to WWII and the Holocaust. Associations are cultural and these are very deeply ingrained. That said, this is a really silly thread overall. Even if he was trying to be antisemitic, which seems incredibly unlikely (and he could've found a much better way), this barely rises to the level of anything. Raise an eyebrow and move on. |
^^^^ can you be any more tone deaf? |