Teachers: do you trust the families in your school to take COVID seriously?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also sounds like some parents don’t want their kids around the poors. Or are 1) disingenuous or 2) bad at judging risk.

LOL at you. The survey and RTS data shows that the low-SES families are choosing DL by a large factor; it is the middle class families that are choosing RTS. The poor kids will be at home, dear. The highly anxious and mildly insane middle class parents are the ones who want to throw their kids into the school cesspool.

well, "dear." The argument again does not rely on different percentages of high and low SES kids choosing in-person. The argument is that people don't seem to care if Larlo is in school with Larla, when Larla's parents work out of the home in jobs like grocery stores. Larlo's parents only care about Larli's parents going on a road trip.

The entire dialogue is about *feelings* rather than actual risks. Larlo's parents *feel* upset by Larli's parents, not Larla's. Larlo's parents aren't caring about the *actual* risks posed by Larla, just by Larli. So Larlo's parents get to feel satisfied in judging Larli's parents. It doesn't matter what the facts on the ground are, apparently. It matters that no one in this thread states that they are worried about the risks posed by Larla.

Also, yikes with the judgement of parents throwing kids into a "cesspool." Read the science, "dear."

YOU are the parent of kids whom I don't want my children around. Yikes. You need to take your meds.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also sounds like some parents don’t want their kids around the poors. Or are 1) disingenuous or 2) bad at judging risk.

LOL at you. The survey and RTS data shows that the low-SES families are choosing DL by a large factor; it is the middle class families that are choosing RTS. The poor kids will be at home, dear. The highly anxious and mildly insane middle class parents are the ones who want to throw their kids into the school cesspool.

well, "dear." The argument again does not rely on different percentages of high and low SES kids choosing in-person. The argument is that people don't seem to care if Larlo is in school with Larla, when Larla's parents work out of the home in jobs like grocery stores. Larlo's parents only care about Larli's parents going on a road trip.

The entire dialogue is about *feelings* rather than actual risks. Larlo's parents *feel* upset by Larli's parents, not Larla's. Larlo's parents aren't caring about the *actual* risks posed by Larla, just by Larli. So Larlo's parents get to feel satisfied in judging Larli's parents. It doesn't matter what the facts on the ground are, apparently. It matters that no one in this thread states that they are worried about the risks posed by Larla.

Also, yikes with the judgement of parents throwing kids into a "cesspool." Read the science, "dear."

YOU are the parent of kids whom I don't want my children around. Yikes. You need to take your meds.

if you stay home, then you never have to deal with anyone you don't like.

but also, respond to the circumstance presented. are you concerned more about risk from the family with parents who work indoors with people or the family who took a road trip to an airbnb two weeks ago?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also sounds like some parents don’t want their kids around the poors. Or are 1) disingenuous or 2) bad at judging risk.

LOL at you. The survey and RTS data shows that the low-SES families are choosing DL by a large factor; it is the middle class families that are choosing RTS. The poor kids will be at home, dear. The highly anxious and mildly insane middle class parents are the ones who want to throw their kids into the school cesspool.

well, "dear." The argument again does not rely on different percentages of high and low SES kids choosing in-person. The argument is that people don't seem to care if Larlo is in school with Larla, when Larla's parents work out of the home in jobs like grocery stores. Larlo's parents only care about Larli's parents going on a road trip.

The entire dialogue is about *feelings* rather than actual risks. Larlo's parents *feel* upset by Larli's parents, not Larla's. Larlo's parents aren't caring about the *actual* risks posed by Larla, just by Larli. So Larlo's parents get to feel satisfied in judging Larli's parents. It doesn't matter what the facts on the ground are, apparently. It matters that no one in this thread states that they are worried about the risks posed by Larla.

Also, yikes with the judgement of parents throwing kids into a "cesspool." Read the science, "dear."

YOU are the parent of kids whom I don't want my children around. Yikes. You need to take your meds.

if you stay home, then you never have to deal with anyone you don't like.

but also, respond to the circumstance presented. are you concerned more about risk from the family with parents who work indoors with people or the family who took a road trip to an airbnb two weeks ago?

Obviously she can't answer that. She'll just make some other derailing comment, because she probably knows what the answer is, and can't face it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also sounds like some parents don’t want their kids around the poors. Or are 1) disingenuous or 2) bad at judging risk.

LOL at you. The survey and RTS data shows that the low-SES families are choosing DL by a large factor; it is the middle class families that are choosing RTS. The poor kids will be at home, dear. The highly anxious and mildly insane middle class parents are the ones who want to throw their kids into the school cesspool.

well, "dear." The argument again does not rely on different percentages of high and low SES kids choosing in-person. The argument is that people don't seem to care if Larlo is in school with Larla, when Larla's parents work out of the home in jobs like grocery stores. Larlo's parents only care about Larli's parents going on a road trip.

The entire dialogue is about *feelings* rather than actual risks. Larlo's parents *feel* upset by Larli's parents, not Larla's. Larlo's parents aren't caring about the *actual* risks posed by Larla, just by Larli. So Larlo's parents get to feel satisfied in judging Larli's parents. It doesn't matter what the facts on the ground are, apparently. It matters that no one in this thread states that they are worried about the risks posed by Larla.

Also, yikes with the judgement of parents throwing kids into a "cesspool." Read the science, "dear."

YOU are the parent of kids whom I don't want my children around. Yikes. You need to take your meds.

I see that condescension and ableist slurs mean you have no response.