FEINSTEIN: Hun, it’s time for you to retire!

[Anonymous]

The only VP of consequence in recent memory is Cheney, and that’s not an example to emulate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This may have been asked but the shingles vaccine has been available for 20 years and a second, more effective shingles vaccine, for ten years. Why didn't she get at least one of them?

To everyone else, please get the two-shot shingles vaccine

She might have got both but you know it’s not 100% and she is old.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.

At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.

If she doesn’t resign they need 60 votes even to temporarily replace her on the Judiciary Committee. They’ll never get them because Republicans are thrilled by the pause in judicial confirmations. She needs to retire.

[Anonymous]

So if she retired tomorrow, what would happen?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So if she retired tomorrow, what would happen?

Newsom would appoint her replacement who would be there in days. Kamala Harris resigned on a Monday and her replacement was sworn in on Wednesday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So if she retired tomorrow, what would happen?

Newsom would appoint her replacement who would be there in days. Kamala Harris resigned on a Monday and her replacement was sworn in on Wednesday.

Ok, let’s go then. Good lord. All respect to her but we need a functioning senate.

[Anonymous]

Maybe…. Kamala could go back? Lol

I know I know. I’ll stop.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.

At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.

If she doesn’t resign they need 60 votes even to temporarily replace her on the Judiciary Committee. They’ll never get them because Republicans are thrilled by the pause in judicial confirmations. She needs to retire.

This is getting crazy. She needs to do the right thing and retire. Can no one talk any sense into her?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.

At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.

If she doesn’t resign they need 60 votes even to temporarily replace her on the Judiciary Committee. They’ll never get them because Republicans are thrilled by the pause in judicial confirmations. She needs to retire.

This is getting crazy. She needs to do the right thing and retire. Can no one talk any sense into her?

She has dementia, so….. ????

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.

At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.

If she doesn’t resign they need 60 votes even to temporarily replace her on the Judiciary Committee. They’ll never get them because Republicans are thrilled by the pause in judicial confirmations. She needs to retire.

This is getting crazy. She needs to do the right thing and retire. Can no one talk any sense into her?

She has dementia, so….. ????

She isn’t legally incompetent as far as I know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.

At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.

If she doesn’t resign they need 60 votes even to temporarily replace her on the Judiciary Committee. They’ll never get them because Republicans are thrilled by the pause in judicial confirmations. She needs to retire.

This is getting crazy. She needs to do the right thing and retire. Can no one talk any sense into her?

She has dementia, so….. ????

Well, did she ask to step away from the judiciary committee on her own or did one of her handlers do it? Someone (or likely multiple people) have been enabling her for a long time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.

At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.

If she doesn’t resign they need 60 votes even to temporarily replace her on the Judiciary Committee. They’ll never get them because Republicans are thrilled by the pause in judicial confirmations. She needs to retire.

This is getting crazy. She needs to do the right thing and retire. Can no one talk any sense into her?

She has dementia, so….. ????

She isn’t legally incompetent as far as I know.

Yes but it makes it difficult to talk any sense into her.

[Anonymous]

If she can stay awake long enough.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.

At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.

If she doesn’t resign they need 60 votes even to temporarily replace her on the Judiciary Committee. They’ll never get them because Republicans are thrilled by the pause in judicial confirmations. She needs to retire.

This is getting crazy. She needs to do the right thing and retire. Can no one talk any sense into her?

She has dementia, so….. ????

Well, did she ask to step away from the judiciary committee on her own or did one of her handlers do it? Someone (or likely multiple people) have been enabling her for a long time.

In a "statement."

[Anonymous]

Anyone else hear the All Things Considered interview with ?? Ro Khanna ?? about this? I can't find a link to it yet, but whoever it was they interviewed was not mincing words.