+1 |
+1 Or we simply realized what is important to us in life. You are very replaceable at your job, no matter what it is. Very few people look back at the end of the day and wish they had worked more. Quite honestly your assessment that SAHMs are not ambitious only reflects poorly on you. |
Pp, you aren’t a very nice person. |
DP. By definition, if you choose to remain at home and not work once your children are in school full-time, you are not ambitious. This is a basic observation. The only thing that would potentially reflect poorly on someone might be how they feel about people who are not ambitious, but not the fact that they point out the obvious. Not everyone needs to be ambitious, that's okay. Some individuals are more replaceable than others, but regardless, many people find great satisfaction from their work. And even for those who might not, I'd like to see how happy the wealthy SAHMs would feel if there weren't people out there providing medical care for their precious children, not just doctors, but nurses and all the other laboratory and administrative staff that keep offices and hospitals running, or if the people who work at power plants, water treatment plants, city governments, county governments, grocery stores, farms, and on and on, all just decided their jobs just weren't important? You rely on the hard work of tons of people you will never meet EVERY SINGLE DAY for your cushy life. The simple fact is that you allow someone else to support you at a time when your children no longer need your immediate care for upwards of six hours a day. It reflects poorly on you that, in your defensiveness, you start your comment with an assertion that only moms who stay home even after their children are in school have discovered what is important in life. How arrogant of you. |
I don’t understand how highly educated equates with ambitious. You can be highly educated but choose to step off the fast track. You can be ambitious but not particularly well educated. |
They don't as another PP pointed out. Two different things. |
NP here, agreeing with this PP. I'm in the same position. When your life is like this, people will be jealous; the solution is not to discuss it or even disclose it. Everyone is happier that way. |
This is such a bizarre argument! It's immoral to not pay someone a fair wage for a job you hire them to do. It's not immoral to hire someone. And the fact that some people, and that includes men and women, leave the workforce (whether to stay at home with school age kids, retire early, for medical reasons or they are just rich and don't want to work) does not mean our economy will collapse. There has always been a segment of people in society who choose not to work. |
I didn’t make that assertion at all. Saying one thing is important to a SAHM is not to the exclusion of non-SAHMs. That may be how you read it, but that’s not what I said. For a variety of reasons, including finances, temperaments, military spouses or the health of your kids not everyone can and or wants to stay home. But it’s extremely disrespectful to tell them they are uneducated or unambitious because they haven’t made the same choices as you. You clearly have a lot of resentment to SAHMs and assume all are wealthy or living cushy lives. That’s a huge generalization. |
You are not getting me at all. Where did I use the word immoral? Where did I mention economic collapse? No where. WTF are you even talking about? I am not saying everyone has to work, I am saying don't insult those who choose to do so as not having figured out "what is important". I am saying don't insult them by telling them how replaceable they are. Every single one of us depends on the work of many other people every single day, so don't be such a snob that you devalue it in order to justify that you choose not to work or have the luxury not to do so. You are wealthy and lucky. Be grateful that you have that option instead of a snobby prat. |
It says "DP". I did not say they are uneducated (and don't believe that), but would argue they are likely not very ambitious. I don't think being ambitious is a necessary thing or that it is negative not to be ambitious, so I don't see any problem with it. And of course there are as many stories as there are fish in the sea, but bringing things back around, the OP hasn't said anything about special circumstances that cause her to stay home now that kids are school aged or close to it. That likely means a certain amount of wealth. That is not a crazy assumption. |
You have a lot of growing up to do. You are obviously not secure in your life. |
Aww did that comment about being replaceable hurt your feelings? It is funny you think it’s fine to tell people they aren’t ambitious but get defensive when called replaceable. I don't think being replaceable is a necessarily a bad thing or that it is negative, so I don't see any problem with it. |
All these threads and all these arguments come down to the same conclusion: people who are happy in life and secure with their choices do not worry about whether or why other people do it differently.
Happy SAHMs don't judge working moms. Happy working moms don't judge SAHMs. People happy with their own life balance don't get angry, defensive, and judgmental very easily! |
Very true. |