Ariana Grande touched inappropriately at Aretha Franklin funeral

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he fired yet?

No, because of slavery and such.

Does anyone think Ariana is his first victim?

If he gropes a woman on stage in front of cameras, this is hardly his first (or worst) rodeo - he felt 'safe' enough to do so, because there's worse. Come on, ladies - speak up and out about this scumbag.

[Anonymous]

Did they really have a wardrobe change for the body and have it passed around in the audience?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Did they really have a wardrobe change for the body and have it passed around in the audience?

Pass around what exactly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for any man who seems to believe he's more important than others. He feels entitled to what he wants.

And watch out for women who dress like a come-on and then cry foul.

No one dresses as a come on. They dress because they like it, For themselves.

Please. You think hookers are dressing for themselves?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he fired yet?

No, because of slavery and such.

Does anyone think Ariana is his first victim?

If he gropes a woman on stage in front of cameras, this is hardly his first (or worst) rodeo - he felt 'safe' enough to do so, because there's worse. Come on, ladies - speak up and out about this scumbag.

I don’t think he was trying to grope her. They were standing on a small pulpit. I think he didn’t want to accidentally knock her off. She’s wearing very spiky heels. Plus trying to keep them both in camera shot. Hilary Clinton put her arm around her the same way.

Yes, he should keep his hands to himself and learn to read body language better. She was leaning out. What he was doing made her uncomfortable. I think he’s honestly contrite about the whole thing.

And completely separate, the dress was too short for a funeral. Cocktail party fine. She’s 25 and I doubt goes to many funerals, but you don’t dress sexy for a funeral. That’s just tacky. Her mother and grandmother shouldn’t have raised such a diva.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The dress is irrelevant. Scumbag pastor is gonna scumbag. If he gropes her in public with cameras on him, imagine what he does in private?

Like the Catholic Prest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did they really have a wardrobe change for the body and have it passed around in the audience?

Pass around what exactly?

Sorry, the body. A PP mentioned there were several wardrobe changes and the body was passed around through the crowd. I only read that here. Did it actually happen?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he fired yet?

No, because of slavery and such.

Does anyone think Ariana is his first victim?

If he gropes a woman on stage in front of cameras, this is hardly his first (or worst) rodeo - he felt 'safe' enough to do so, because there's worse. Come on, ladies - speak up and out about this scumbag.

I don’t think he was trying to grope her. They were standing on a small pulpit. I think he didn’t want to accidentally knock her off. She’s wearing very spiky heels. Plus trying to keep them both in camera shot. Hilary Clinton put her arm around her the same way.

Yes, he should keep his hands to himself and learn to read body language better. She was leaning out. What he was doing made her uncomfortable. I think he’s honestly contrite about the whole thing.

And completely separate, the dress was too short for a funeral. Cocktail party fine. She’s 25 and I doubt goes to many funerals, but you don’t dress sexy for a funeral. That’s just tacky. Her mother and grandmother shouldn’t have raised such a diva.

You sound like an enabler

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he fired yet?

No, because of slavery and such.

Does anyone think Ariana is his first victim?

If he gropes a woman on stage in front of cameras, this is hardly his first (or worst) rodeo - he felt 'safe' enough to do so, because there's worse. Come on, ladies - speak up and out about this scumbag.

I don’t think he was trying to grope her. They were standing on a small pulpit. I think he didn’t want to accidentally knock her off. She’s wearing very spiky heels. Plus trying to keep them both in camera shot. Hilary Clinton put her arm around her the same way.

Yes, he should keep his hands to himself and learn to read body language better. She was leaning out. What he was doing made her uncomfortable. I think he’s honestly contrite about the whole thing.

And completely separate, the dress was too short for a funeral. Cocktail party fine. She’s 25 and I doubt goes to many funerals, but you don’t dress sexy for a funeral. That’s just tacky. Her mother and grandmother shouldn’t have raised such a diva.

You sound like an enabler

Or worse...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for any man who seems to believe he's more important than others. He feels entitled to what he wants.

And watch out for women who dress like a come-on and then cry foul.

No one dresses as a come on. They dress because they like it, For themselves.

Please. You think hookers are dressing for themselves?

Can you please stop with this nonsense and noise to take away from what the real problem is. Ariana Grande can show up in a garbage bag and people will still pay to hear her sing and men would still desire her. That's a little different than being a hooker, as much as it's all blurry in your mind.

Now back to the subject - he inappropriately touched her, something that he defines as 'being overly friendly', so he is still above it all and not admitting that he wouldn't touch his daughter like that or his sister...or would he??? What a scumbag!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is he fired yet?

No, because of slavery and such.

Does anyone think Ariana is his first victim?

If he gropes a woman on stage in front of cameras, this is hardly his first (or worst) rodeo - he felt 'safe' enough to do so, because there's worse. Come on, ladies - speak up and out about this scumbag.

He hugs and touches and shakes hands all day, and has done so for years. He knows exactly where to put his hands or not. He absolutely did this on purpose. And eff her dress. And eff y'all that brought up her dress. People like you are why he gets to keep his job, because there is an always an excuse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for any man who seems to believe he's more important than others. He feels entitled to what he wants.

And watch out for women who dress like a come-on and then cry foul.

No one dresses as a come on. They dress because they like it, For themselves.

Please. You think hookers are dressing for themselves?

Can you please stop with this nonsense and noise to take away from what the real problem is. Ariana Grande can show up in a garbage bag and people will still pay to hear her sing and men would still desire her. That's a little different than being a hooker, as much as it's all blurry in your mind.

Now back to the subject - he inappropriately touched her, something that he defines as 'being overly friendly', so he is still above it all and not admitting that he wouldn't touch his daughter like that or his sister...or would he??? What a scumbag!

Agree with everything, except let's stop calling it "inappropriate touching". A little pat on my pregnant belly by a stranger is an "inappropriate touch".
What he did was sexual assault. Let's be perfectly clear.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for any man who seems to believe he's more important than others. He feels entitled to what he wants.

And watch out for women who dress like a come-on and then cry foul.

No one dresses as a come on. They dress because they like it, For themselves.

Please. You think hookers are dressing for themselves?

Can you please stop with this nonsense and noise to take away from what the real problem is. Ariana Grande can show up in a garbage bag and people will still pay to hear her sing and men would still desire her. That's a little different than being a hooker, as much as it's all blurry in your mind.

Now back to the subject - he inappropriately touched her, something that he defines as 'being overly friendly', so he is still above it all and not admitting that he wouldn't touch his daughter like that or his sister...or would he??? What a scumbag!

Agree with everything, except let's stop calling it "inappropriate touching". A little pat on my pregnant belly by a stranger is an "inappropriate touch".
What he did was sexual assault. Let's be perfectly clear.

Sorry, you're absolutely right! I'm a foreigner and so mad about this, probably making a lot of mistakes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for any man who seems to believe he's more important than others. He feels entitled to what he wants.

And watch out for women who dress like a come-on and then cry foul.

No one dresses as a come on. They dress because they like it, For themselves.

Please. You think hookers are dressing for themselves?

Can you please stop with this nonsense and noise to take away from what the real problem is. Ariana Grande can show up in a garbage bag and people will still pay to hear her sing and men would still desire her. That's a little different than being a hooker, as much as it's all blurry in your mind.

Now back to the subject - he inappropriately touched her, something that he defines as 'being overly friendly', so he is still above it all and not admitting that he wouldn't touch his daughter like that or his sister...or would he??? What a scumbag!

No one is saying otherwise. No one is saying he had the right to grope her. It's also true that she wore a sexy dress to sing at a funeral. Unless you think she just grabbed the first thing off the rack, she dressed to look a certain way on purpose. It's not what most people would consider appropriate attire for a funeral.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The dress is irrelevant. Scumbag pastor is gonna scumbag. If he gropes her in public with cameras on him, imagine what he does in private?

Like the Catholic Prest

I mentioned the Catholic Priests earlier in the thread and it got deleted. I guess the decades of sexual abuse is irrelevant in this pop culture thread.