Actually, if she's truly a smart woman and thinking ahead about having children, she would have given more consideration to the person she was marrying and the types of behaviors he was displaying as she was dating him. Don't you think it's a tad late to be thinking of your spouse as a scumbag and going through a divorce when you're about to deliver your second child? People on this board often criticize men for thinking with the wrong part of their anatomy. What do you think she was doing? |
All of this is true. But you have 1-in-50 chance of raising a "resilient" healthy child when there's a contentious divorce and the media is watching your every move. These kids are going to be f#cked when they read articles 10 years from now. about the crazy sh#t their dad did and said, how he treated their mother, his slavish loyalty to Trump over their mother, etc. #daddyissues #therapy |
If we are divorced, our children mostly will also be divorced. That's a fact. ![]() |
That I can't answer. I can only say that once they do marry the bad person, they're stuck. No getting out till you're dead, sweetheart! Think of the children. |
Whatever was in her head when she married the guy, clearly she was doing something wrong, and now must be punished. For the sake of the children, of course. |
Ergo: no divorce. You break it, you buy it. |
I DIDN'T SAY she SHOULD be punished; just stating the facts re how consequences result from our choices. Fact.of. life. |
Not stuck in a marriage, but stuck with dealing with the father of your children 'til they're grown and afterwards. Much better to think ahead. |
That's right. Prison or stay married. Fact. Of. Life. Why should the children have to live without their coked up power mad daddy? |
But serious question for the person who is so concerned about the kids - are you pro choice or pro life? My suspicion is that you are pro life but I don't feel certain. |
People who feel less concerned about children of divorce should also be more likely to abort? Interesting coloration. |
Don't you get it yet? It's always the woman's fault! In fact, Deidre kinda owes her kids, the Mooch and the various Good Peoole Jeff as some form of self-harming contrition. She probably shouldn't even send the kids to school, they're doomed!!!!! |
Less likely is what I said - I suspect you are pro life is what I said. You're going to have that child and then you are going to be stuck with the father. |
I say this will all due respect: you're quite the special mental midget. When someone goes to join the West Wing, it is a JOINT DECISION with your spouse. The spouse - male or female - retains veto rights. Why? Because it's a massive lifestyle change, you & your family come under intense scrutiny, it's stressful, and you never see your family. You essentially leave town and may not come back except once every few weeks. Or you move the entire family to DC. Scaramucci's wife had no idea when she married him 3.5-4 years ago that he would work in the White House. She didn't sign up for that. And its clear that he completely ignored the Spouse Veto rule. Therefore, she has every right to divorce him for joining the West Wing without her consent. He violated their marriage vows. |
Overreact much? No one said it's always the woman's fault or that she should be punished or that she has to stay married; however, more than a few posters here don't seem to think women share any responsibility about getting pregnant and the consequences for themselves and their families. There's not one choice we make in life that doesn't have a consequence. Not one. |