Underwhelming appearance by Principal Martin at Wilson HS Open House

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCPS really needs to get out in front of this, quickly. Wilson is basically the only traditional non-charter/application high school worth attending. If high achieving families start to lose confidence and Wilson collapses. Then DCPS is basically out of the secondary education business. And if that happens, it's game over for the system.

+1.

What exactly is 'this' that DCPS needs to be in front of?

Oh, I don't know. Maybe a better explanation for a statistically significant drop, rather than blaming some sort of senior prank. And, providing a path forward for improving the scores. Instead the principal sends out a jaw dropping, total non sequitur email about some sort of hidden racial biases. I'm sure the Long and Foster agents phones blew up after that email went out.

Maybe Wilson students should have to take the English exam again now.

I found the 2015 subgroup breakouts for white students at Wilson.

In 2015 83.1% scored proficient or advanced and in 2016 45.0% did.

Thanks
What about other groups?

Don't be silly. Tucker read the bell curve. That's why he knows the other groups don't matter.

Please, we are trying to have a conversation here.

[Anonymous]

No you're not. You're trying to "prove" some imaginary point as an excuse to spew more hate and divisiveness because you are a pathetic twat. Anyone disagree?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No you're not. You're trying to "prove" some imaginary point as an excuse to spew more hate and divisiveness because you are a pathetic twat. Anyone disagree?

What a douche.

[Anonymous]

Honestly I just hate looking at that spreadsheet from 2014-15.

Ok, here are subset ELA proficient and advanced percentages for 2015 and 2016.

White
2015: 83.1%
2015:; 45%

Black
2015: 25.6%
2016: 8%

Asian
2015: <25
2016: 31%

Latino
2015: 48.6%
2016: 12%

Two or more races
2015: <25
2016: 32%

[Anonymous]

Is it true chick filet is only serving carry out when Wilson lets out? It's time for Mary Cheh and DcPS and the police to sit down and talk about how to make school let out work for the students, but also work for area businesses and the neighborhood. Now. Get out ahead on it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Honestly I just hate looking at that spreadsheet from 2014-15.

Ok, here are subset ELA proficient and advanced percentages for 2015 and 2016.

White
2015: 83.1%
2015:; 45%

Black
2015: 25.6%
2016: 8%

Asian
2015: <25
2016: 31%

Latino
2015: 48.6%
2016: 12%

Two or more races
2015: <25
2016: 32%

Thank you.

So the student revolt was generalized.

And the administration had no idea of what was going on?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly I just hate looking at that spreadsheet from 2014-15.

Ok, here are subset ELA proficient and advanced percentages for 2015 and 2016.

White
2015: 83.1%
2015:; 45%

Black
2015: 25.6%
2016: 8%

Asian
2015: <25
2016: 31%

Latino
2015: 48.6%
2016: 12%

Two or more races
2015: <25
2016: 32%

Thank you.

So the student revolt was generalized.

And the administration had no idea of what was going on?

Maybe they should've been following students on instagram or snapchat, or something.

[Anonymous]

OTOH - big jump in number of Asian and students of two or more races at Wilson.

Not enough to report scores for 14-15 but more now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Honestly I just hate looking at that spreadsheet from 2014-15.

Ok, here are subset ELA proficient and advanced percentages for 2015 and 2016.

White
2015: 83.1%
2015:; 45%

Black
2015: 25.6%
2016: 8%

Asian
2015: <25
2016: 31%

Latino
2015: 48.6%
2016: 12%

Two or more races
2015: <25
2016: 32%

Thank you.

So the student revolt was generalized.

And the administration had no idea of what was going on?

Maybe they should've been following students on instagram or snapchat, or something.

Or simply talk to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DCPS really needs to get out in front of this, quickly. Wilson is basically the only traditional non-charter/application high school worth attending. If high achieving families start to lose confidence and Wilson collapses. Then DCPS is basically out of the secondary education business. And if that happens, it's game over for the system.

I'm a Wilson parent and I don't get why are people overreacting to this. The kids who would score well on the test didn't care about taking the test. End of story.

The way to get kids rethinking it is to show them this thread and other commentary and let them know that the reputation of the school is at risk. Believe me I got a thoughtful pause when I brought this up to some students myself.

But to think that these test scores actually mean very much about what the high-performing kids are actually learning, I personally don't buy it, especially given the college results of the seniors last year.

[Anonymous]

It's not the SAT's folks; get over it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DCPS really needs to get out in front of this, quickly. Wilson is basically the only traditional non-charter/application high school worth attending. If high achieving families start to lose confidence and Wilson collapses. Then DCPS is basically out of the secondary education business. And if that happens, it's game over for the system.

I'm a Wilson parent and I don't get why are people overreacting to this. The kids who would score well on the test didn't care about taking the test. End of story.

The way to get kids rethinking it is to show them this thread and other commentary and let them know that the reputation of the school is at risk. Believe me I got a thoughtful pause when I brought this up to some students myself.

But to think that these test scores actually mean very much about what the high-performing kids are actually learning, I personally don't buy it, especially given the college results of the seniors last year.

That's what I assume principals did at other schools like SWW, Banneker...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't hold Ms Martin accountable for the PARCC scores at this stage, but I think the timing of exams needs to be reworked. Kids sitting AP Calc shouldn't have to stress about Geometry PARCC when they are trying to run through a timed practice AP...Also, I think PARCC should test the student the year they take that class, not 3 yrs later[/quote]

Most of the charters are only giving PARCC to students in the relevant year (10th for ELA and Geometry when that is relevant). My 9th grader took no PARCC exams last year.

DCPS decided to give it to everyone, and more than once. His good friend at Wilson high school has taken (and passed) PARCC ELA and PARC Math Geometry twice (in 9th and 10th). That's beyond what OSSE required and no doubt does seem dumb to some DCPS parents and students.

Going forward anyone taking AP Calc should have taken PARCC math a couple of years prior.

I am confused about the bolded part. Why is the test 3 years after the class?

[Anonymous]

I don't have a dog in this fight anymore (which probably means I will now get snarky comments), but I think everyone's fretting over something that is almost impossible to fix. If a big enough group of kids at Wilson didn't care about the PARCC because they were worried about AP's, thought it was stupid, thought is didn't really matter to them, then DCPS and Wilson need to work together to figure out a way to make it matter, assuming they in fact think it really does. If the test scores reflect the level of academic rigor at Wilson, or the schools that feed into it, then DCPS as a whole needs to take a new look at their curriculum. Either way, DCPS has to think the scores are worth caring about more than just the 5 minutes after they see them.

I think it's worth noting, though, that kids all over the country thought the test was stupid. Call it test fatigue or irritation that no one does (or can do) anything to fix the curriculum or achievement gap, but kids in many schools either opted out or put little effort into it. Wilson has many issues, but they aren't really all that different in this regard.

Beyond that, well done, Banneker.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Honestly I just hate looking at that spreadsheet from 2014-15.

Ok, here are subset ELA proficient and advanced percentages for 2015 and 2016.

White
2015: 83.1%
2015:; 45%

Black
2015: 25.6%
2016: 8%

Asian
2015: <25
2016: 31%

Latino
2015: 48.6%
2016: 12%

Two or more races
2015: <25
2016: 32%

Great to see an interracial fight against oppression