Secular family values rock!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And your numbers are dwindling rapidly, because thinking for yourself about religion is the first step away from it.

So disappointed in you. You showed a spark of intellectual curiosity when you googled dialectical materialism. I even allowed myself to hope that we could have an adult conversation.

Now you're back to pulling insults out of your butt. You don't have an answer about dialectical materialism or Mao? Thinking about these things would require intellectual effort? So you just derail the conversation with one of your stock, unoriginal insults.

Ugh. So childish.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And your numbers are dwindling rapidly, because thinking for yourself about religion is the first step away from it.

So disappointed in you. You showed a spark of intellectual curiosity when you googled dialectical materialism. I even allowed myself to hope that we could have an adult conversation.

Now you're back to pulling insults out of your butt. You don't have an answer about dialectical materialism or Mao? Thinking about these things would require intellectual effort? So you just derail the conversation with one of your stock, unoriginal insults.

Ugh. So childish.

Above written by different poster.

At any rate, nothing childish about it. It is a fact and is a sign of rational thinking. Not to say, people who don't step away from religion after thinking about it are irrational, just that such behavior is the first step away for many people. Other educated people are able to stay with their religion after thinking for themselves about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And your numbers are dwindling rapidly, because thinking for yourself about religion is the first step away from it.

So disappointed in you. You showed a spark of intellectual curiosity when you googled dialectical materialism. I even allowed myself to hope that we could have an adult conversation.

Now you're back to pulling insults out of your butt. You don't have an answer about dialectical materialism or Mao? Thinking about these things would require intellectual effort? So you just derail the conversation with one of your stock, unoriginal insults.

Ugh. So childish.

I didn't write that - although I do agree with that statement in bold.

On that note, I'm also not in need of earning your respect. I am not wrong in my interpretation of dialectical materialism either - but will not continue this dialogue, as it's become wearisome.

[Anonymous]

The angry atheist echo chamber. All the people of faith who wanted to have a civil discussion have left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The angry atheist echo chamber. All the people of faith who wanted to have a civil discussion have left.

That was the goal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The angry atheist echo chamber. All the people of faith who wanted to have a civil discussion have left.

That was the goal.

of a certain bitter "person of faith' who wants exclusive control over discussions with atheists

[Anonymous]

You mean people naturally do what God created them to do? Shocker!

[Anonymous]

Common Grace. Google it.