Who appeals to INDEPENDENTS for president right now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need to win in 2028, and that means being pragmatic.

Nobody from inside this insanely corrupt administration, no matter how uncomfortable they look sitting on the sofa in the Oval.

Nobody who has provided cover for this administration or stayed silent in the face of the corruption - which rules out pretty much every establishment Republican.

If this nation wouldn't elect Hillary or Kamala, it's not electing AOC either. We need a pragmatic candidate who is not deeply in bed with AIPAC.

Says the fruitcake who puts two corporate owned politicians in the same bucket as AOC. You have a lot to learn about politics, my friend. AOC could not be more different politically than Harris or Clinton.

DP. Only an actual fruitcake would claim that AOC could win the presidency. You are not a serious person.

Dp. No horse in this race but you should know using this phrase is seriously cringe. It had a moment several years back with Succession and is now really embarrassing to use

Says the person using "seriously cringe."

You can try to deflect if you want. But you’re embarrassing yourself and your troll peers. Part of your job is to stay current on American lingo.

And you as well, weirdo! Please stop embarrassing yourself by responding to something so trivial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need to win in 2028, and that means being pragmatic.

Nobody from inside this insanely corrupt administration, no matter how uncomfortable they look sitting on the sofa in the Oval.

Nobody who has provided cover for this administration or stayed silent in the face of the corruption - which rules out pretty much every establishment Republican.

If this nation wouldn't elect Hillary or Kamala, it's not electing AOC either. We need a pragmatic candidate who is not deeply in bed with AIPAC.

Says the fruitcake who puts two corporate owned politicians in the same bucket as AOC. You have a lot to learn about politics, my friend. AOC could not be more different politically than Harris or Clinton.

I'm not a fruitcake, poster. I'm a nearly 60 year old American woman who has a PoliSci degree, a law degree, and decades of experience closely following and working in politics. I doubt very much you know more about how our political system works than I do. And you seem to be massively ignorant of the misogyny that prevails in our society and political system, even though it stares you in the face every single day in the news cycle. The USA is not ready to elect a woman, sad as that is. She could be so far out of the political establishment as to be from Venus, and our sick misogynistic patriarchal strangleheld society WOULD NOT ELECT HER.

Now I'm sure you can imagine what I'm wishing for you and your nastiness right now. Go dial up some porn and do it.

Dp. Are you the one who also called AOC an airhead? Yeah, you’re likely not any of the things you claim to be. My guess is you are someone who’d like people to believe that AOC is ‘just not electable’. Why? Because she is the most dangerous to you.

AOC is certainly no airhead. In fact, she is one our brightest members in Congress and one of the very few who hasn't sold out to mega-donors. Her populist rhetoric is favored by a vast majority of Americans. Her problem is not electability. Her problem is nomination ability. A major party nomination of a true populist candidate is extraordinarily unlikely anytime soon because the ultra-wealthy entities in control of our political system will fight tooth and nail against the nomination of anyone threatening to close the wealth divide. We've seen how this plays out in recent elections. The money wins and the American people lose.

Citation for the bolded? Thanks.

NP here. Just look at the 2024 election and Trump's messages of populism. (of course he lied, but that was the platform he ran on).

No. Provide a claim for this nonsense. Still waiting - because neither you nor the PP have anything resembling proof of this idiotic statement.

[Anonymous]

Thom Tillis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It may be time to take a second look at Ron DeSantis. He's back to pronouncing it Dee-Santis (i.e., with a long e, instead of Dih-santis) and a lot of people are feeling pretty enthused.

Anonymous wrote:

Lol. Not a chance. He’s moved even further right, alienating many FL centrists and independents. Guy is a clown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone voting independent is not serious.

You must work for the RNC/DNC corporation. I understand you want to keep your job, but people need to stop supporting these corporations.

[Anonymous]

Anyone that commits to enforcing border security

During the Biden administration, CBS News saw hundreds of migrants cross into the U.S. illegally near the Texas border city of Eagle Pass. Today, CBS News' Camilo Montoya-Galvez returned to the same location and found a very different situation – not a single migrant.

Find a single democrat that will commit to that ??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone that commits to enforcing border security

During the Biden administration, CBS News saw hundreds of migrants cross into the U.S. illegally near the Texas border city of Eagle Pass. Today, CBS News' Camilo Montoya-Galvez returned to the same location and found a very different situation – not a single migrant.

Find a single democrat that will commit to that ??

Only a lunatic would make this a top issue right now. Reminds me of the democrats that skipped voting because they thought that Harris was too mean to Gaza.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone voting independent is not serious.

You must work for the RNC/DNC corporation. I understand you want to keep your job, but people need to stop supporting these corporations.

+ 100000

Anyone supporting corruption in politics is an enemy of the American people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone that commits to enforcing border security

During the Biden administration, CBS News saw hundreds of migrants cross into the U.S. illegally near the Texas border city of Eagle Pass. Today, CBS News' Camilo Montoya-Galvez returned to the same location and found a very different situation – not a single migrant.

Find a single democrat that will commit to that ??

Only a lunatic would make this a top issue right now. Reminds me of the democrats that skipped voting because they thought that Harris was too mean to Gaza.

In fairness, millions of undocumented people from all over the world streamed across the border under Biden and Harris. There is zero popular support for that anywhere on the political spectrum - from left to right. Why Democrats chose to make illegal migration their signature issue remains baffling. It has zero support from Sanders Democrats because of the effect on wages, social services, education, housing costs, and on and on. And obviously the right didn't care for it either because of culture issues.

Which makes you think who wanted all that?

Wall Street did. An endless supply of cheap labor that can be easily exploited. And who are the leaders of the Democratic Party? Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, both representing New York and Wall Street. And who has been the major power in the Democratic Party for years? Hillary Clinton, also a former senator from New York and closely associated with Wall Street.

Democrats have chosen Wall Street. And that has all sorts of consequences. Today, Republicans can claim to be the anti-establishment party. And that's just sad. No one trusts the Democratic Party of Schumer, Jeffries, Biden, Harris, and Clinton.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thom Tillis.

Let's not do another should-be-retiree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thom Tillis.

Let's not do another should-be-retiree.

He's 65. He's got another good decade in him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thom Tillis.

Not bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thom Tillis.

Not bad.

This is going to sound crazy, but he should freshen up his look somehow. He looks far older than he is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone that commits to enforcing border security

During the Biden administration, CBS News saw hundreds of migrants cross into the U.S. illegally near the Texas border city of Eagle Pass. Today, CBS News' Camilo Montoya-Galvez returned to the same location and found a very different situation – not a single migrant.

Find a single democrat that will commit to that ??

Only a lunatic would make this a top issue right now. Reminds me of the democrats that skipped voting because they thought that Harris was too mean to Gaza.

In fairness, millions of undocumented people from all over the world streamed across the border under Biden and Harris. There is zero popular support for that anywhere on the political spectrum - from left to right. Why Democrats chose to make illegal migration their signature issue remains baffling. It has zero support from Sanders Democrats because of the effect on wages, social services, education, housing costs, and on and on. And obviously the right didn't care for it either because of culture issues.

Which makes you think who wanted all that?

Wall Street did. An endless supply of cheap labor that can be easily exploited. And who are the leaders of the Democratic Party? Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, both representing New York and Wall Street. And who has been the major power in the Democratic Party for years? Hillary Clinton, also a former senator from New York and closely associated with Wall Street.

Democrats have chosen Wall Street. And that has all sorts of consequences. Today, Republicans can claim to be the anti-establishment party. And that's just sad. No one trusts the Democratic Party of Schumer, Jeffries, Biden, Harris, and Clinton.

Well said.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone that commits to enforcing border security

During the Biden administration, CBS News saw hundreds of migrants cross into the U.S. illegally near the Texas border city of Eagle Pass. Today, CBS News' Camilo Montoya-Galvez returned to the same location and found a very different situation – not a single migrant.

Find a single democrat that will commit to that ??

Only a lunatic would make this a top issue right now. Reminds me of the democrats that skipped voting because they thought that Harris was too mean to Gaza.

In fairness, millions of undocumented people from all over the world streamed across the border under Biden and Harris. There is zero popular support for that anywhere on the political spectrum - from left to right. Why Democrats chose to make illegal migration their signature issue remains baffling. It has zero support from Sanders Democrats because of the effect on wages, social services, education, housing costs, and on and on. And obviously the right didn't care for it either because of culture issues.

Which makes you think who wanted all that?

Wall Street did. An endless supply of cheap labor that can be easily exploited. And who are the leaders of the Democratic Party? Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, both representing New York and Wall Street. And who has been the major power in the Democratic Party for years? Hillary Clinton, also a former senator from New York and closely associated with Wall Street.

Democrats have chosen Wall Street. And that has all sorts of consequences. Today, Republicans can claim to be the anti-establishment party. And that's just sad. No one trusts the Democratic Party of Schumer, Jeffries, Biden, Harris, and Clinton.

Well said.

Your beef is with Joe Biden; not "Democrats". Joe Biden is dead and gone to the Dem Party because Dems know when it's time to get rid of an unfit and unpopular elderly leader. When will the GOP wake up and get rid of their even more unfit and unpopular elderly leader? Dems, once again, are one step ahead of the GOP in the race to be the less awful of our two major parties.