Kathy Ruemmler. How could she???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fascinated with people that have so much money yet have a compulsion to associate with questionable people to get free stuff.

She made millions every year - pay for your own trips and private planes!

I have known more than my fair share of these people. They will take a private plane and go to a concert in like Las Vegas on a scumbag's dime. Meanwhile they just sold a company for millions.

The money is just digits on a screen. Strivers like Ruemmler are used to the number always growing. I suspect she comes from UMC roots and never really leveled up her lifestyle. GS pays for her transportation and meals. She probably hasn’t paid for a vacation in years, just uses corporate jet and points. She may actually have a clothing allowance from Goldman. The company probably pays for an apartment in the city. No kids, no spouse to consider.

If you never change your life style, the money doesn’t seem real even if the number is enormous in your accounts. You’ll still chase after freebies or hoard credit card points.

She’s probably worth close to $100M but has never lived a life off the treadmill. She’s never had to spend down a part of the corpus. She’s going to be in for a massive shock, will probably have a mental breakdown.

She does come from an UMC family. Father was a computer scientist who died in 2012, a date that might be relevant. Mother was a research scientist for Battelle.

We know from her emails that Latham was giving her an $8,000 a month housing allowance in 2014.

Equity partners get housing allowances? How bizarre

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am fascinated with people that have so much money yet have a compulsion to associate with questionable people to get free stuff.

She made millions every year - pay for your own trips and private planes!

I have known more than my fair share of these people. They will take a private plane and go to a concert in like Las Vegas on a scumbag's dime. Meanwhile they just sold a company for millions.

The money is just digits on a screen. Strivers like Ruemmler are used to the number always growing. I suspect she comes from UMC roots and never really leveled up her lifestyle. GS pays for her transportation and meals. She probably hasn’t paid for a vacation in years, just uses corporate jet and points. She may actually have a clothing allowance from Goldman. The company probably pays for an apartment in the city. No kids, no spouse to consider.

If you never change your life style, the money doesn’t seem real even if the number is enormous in your accounts. You’ll still chase after freebies or hoard credit card points.

She’s probably worth close to $100M but has never lived a life off the treadmill. She’s never had to spend down a part of the corpus. She’s going to be in for a massive shock, will probably have a mental breakdown.

She does come from an UMC family. Father was a computer scientist who died in 2012, a date that might be relevant. Mother was a research scientist for Battelle.

We know from her emails that Latham was giving her an $8,000 a month housing allowance in 2014.

Equity partners get housing allowances? How bizarre

Tax deductible write off for the firm in lieu of comp. If they paid her $96K extra in comp, there would be self-employment income taxes, FICA, etc

These fringe benefits are tax optimization plays

[Anonymous]

Our government has been captured by an international cartel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s totally insane someone with absolutely zero morals was nearly Obama’s AG.

She's tripling down on her patently bs excuse.

What a despicable human being.

Maybe someone should tell Goldman. She's still on the web site:

https://www.goldmansachs.com/our-firm/our-people-and-leadership/leadership/management-committee/kathryn-ruemmler

Her last day is June 30.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s totally insane someone with absolutely zero morals was nearly Obama’s AG.

She's tripling down on her patently bs excuse.

What a despicable human being.

Maybe someone should tell Goldman. She's still on the web site:

https://www.goldmansachs.com/our-firm/our-people-and-leadership/leadership/management-committee/kathryn-ruemmler

Her last day is June 30.

Rest and vest.

[Anonymous]

Her house in Westgate was on the market a few years ago. Now seeing in the files some of the appliances in it were apparently funded by Epstein. Crazy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Our government has been captured by an international cartel.

Same team as you.

However! Don’t undermine your point for assuming that someone running appointees and running ethics is THE most ethical person. Not a job requirement. Not even ethical at all.

Nice to have.

Also, she might have been white hat all the way around except for a little corner of her brain that wanted a seedy outlet. (Barf)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She consulted with Epstein about her affair with a married man:

https://www.jmail.world/thread/EFTA02498273?view=inbox

It’s him
https://www.steptoe.com/en/lawyers/reid-weingarten.html

Reid Weingarten is 76 and Kathy Ruemmler is 54. So at the time Reid’s wife caught on about the affair, Reid was 65 and Kathy was 43. She obviously has serious daddy issues, and that’s what made Epstein appealing to her. She didn’t need his gifts. With a big law salary with no kids, she could have bought herself a fur and Birkin. She needed his attention.

Also, did anyone notice the bizarre PS on the email from Reid’s wife? It seems like she was hoping to distract Kathy with another father figure she could fall in love with. Yikes. I hope he wasn’t married.

[Anonymous]

What’s with the anti feminist accusation trope I’ve been hearing?

This woman deserves the scorn. It’s not because she’s a woman

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She consulted with Epstein about her affair with a married man:

https://www.jmail.world/thread/EFTA02498273?view=inbox

She got mad that her affair partners equally deluded wife had the nerve to send her a poorly executed passive aggressive put down declaring the affair o-v-e-r.

This is like the joke “the aristocrats” but turned on its ear in a big way.

Umm explain what you mean?

The email from the wife is sad. All of these people are awful.

+1. The wife email is sad. It’s basically please stay away from my weak husband for the sake of our marriage and our kid.

What goes around comes around. That poor wife is now watching Ruemmler's downfall.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She consulted with Epstein about her affair with a married man:

https://www.jmail.world/thread/EFTA02498273?view=inbox

It’s him
https://www.steptoe.com/en/lawyers/reid-weingarten.html

Reid Weingarten is 76 and Kathy Ruemmler is 54. So at the time Reid’s wife caught on about the affair, Reid was 65 and Kathy was 43. She obviously has serious daddy issues, and that’s what made Epstein appealing to her. She didn’t need his gifts. With a big law salary with no kids, she could have bought herself a fur and Birkin. She needed his attention.

Also, did anyone notice the bizarre PS on the email from Reid’s wife? It seems like she was hoping to distract Kathy with another father figure she could fall in love with. Yikes. I hope he wasn’t married.

That whole email and her snarky responses were very odd. He was "addicted" to her? Have you tried sleeping with your old boss, Bob Bauer?

It read like there was some weird reverse grooming. Like she was using Epstein's techniques on Weingarten and that the apprentice had become a master.

The saddest part is that it's all so cliche. Her dad dies and she goes off on some weird destructive bender of old men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our government has been captured by an international cartel.

Same team as you.

However! Don’t undermine your point for assuming that someone running appointees and running ethics is THE most ethical person. Not a job requirement. Not even ethical at all.

Nice to have.

Also, she might have been white hat all the way around except for a little corner of her brain that wanted a seedy outlet. (Barf)

people/ entities that preach ethics are often the ones that lack them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She consulted with Epstein about her affair with a married man:

https://www.jmail.world/thread/EFTA02498273?view=inbox

She got mad that her affair partners equally deluded wife had the nerve to send her a poorly executed passive aggressive put down declaring the affair o-v-e-r.

This is like the joke “the aristocrats” but turned on its ear in a big way.

Umm explain what you mean?

The email from the wife is sad. All of these people are awful.

+1. The wife email is sad. It’s basically please stay away from my weak husband for the sake of our marriage and our kid.

What goes around comes around. That poor wife is now watching Ruemmler's downfall.

Fk her too. Her husband was JE’s defense lawyer. At the point where Weingarten still represented JE, an ethical person would’ve declined the engagement.

Also, come the fk on. Her husband made choices too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She consulted with Epstein about her affair with a married man:

https://www.jmail.world/thread/EFTA02498273?view=inbox

She got mad that her affair partners equally deluded wife had the nerve to send her a poorly executed passive aggressive put down declaring the affair o-v-e-r.

This is like the joke “the aristocrats” but turned on its ear in a big way.

Umm explain what you mean?

The email from the wife is sad. All of these people are awful.

+1. The wife email is sad. It’s basically please stay away from my weak husband for the sake of our marriage and our kid.

What goes around comes around. That poor wife is now watching Ruemmler's downfall.

Fk her too. Her husband was JE’s defense lawyer. At the point where Weingarten still represented JE, an ethical person would’ve declined the engagement.

Also, come the fk on. Her husband made choices too.

Eh, I see your point. Fk them all.

[Anonymous]

Any one have a link to the email from Weingarten’s wife to Rummeler?