Did Vance throw his Hindu under the bus for not being a born again Christian today?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Born again Christians and Catholics do not see each other as equals. Odd that he doesn’t join the evangelicals.

He did and discarded them for Catholics.


Do the Christians realize it?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.


That IS shocking. Usha is the only trump crowd woman who looks good. That EK looks like she drank the poison brew the rest of them did.

I would not say Usha looks "good." She is frequently out with unbrushed hair, no makeup, and rumpled clothes. She looks human and doesn't have the horrific plastic surgery that most of them have, but she could stand to step it up.

And as I posted upthread, she recently has and looks much better, so I think she also suspects something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

Part of it, I wonder, is if she was just new to being a public figure and wasn't really sure how the whole "Being married to the VP of the USA" thing worked. Like she didn't realize how photographed she would be so she thought it was fine to go to the Pope's inaugural mass in no makeup. I am not sure that she realized, oh, I'm going to meet the Pope and there's going to be an HD video of me talking to him completely barefaced. She looked ill. No makeup is fine in real life but not on camera.

But yeah, it is suspicious she has started wearing 4" heels and pencil skirts a month after her husband started getting closer to Erika Kirk.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.


That IS shocking. Usha is the only trump crowd woman who looks good. That EK looks like she drank the poison brew the rest of them did.

I would not say Usha looks "good." She is frequently out with unbrushed hair, no makeup, and rumpled clothes. She looks human and doesn't have the horrific plastic surgery that most of them have, but she could stand to step it up.

And as I posted upthread, she recently has and looks much better, so I think she also suspects something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

Part of it, I wonder, is if she was just new to being a public figure and wasn't really sure how the whole "Being married to the VP of the USA" thing worked. Like she didn't realize how photographed she would be so she thought it was fine to go to the Pope's inaugural mass in no makeup. I am not sure that she realized, oh, I'm going to meet the Pope and there's going to be an HD video of me talking to him completely barefaced. She looked ill. No makeup is fine in real life but not on camera.

But yeah, it is suspicious she has started wearing 4" heels and pencil skirts a month after her husband started getting closer to Erika Kirk.

DP. It basically shows her arrogance. She just thought she would step into the role without thinking through what other people in the position do. Classic nerd with no ability to look beyond their own credentials. “Oh I’m a former scotus clerk and Yale grad of course I’ll be the best at this”. And now she’s going to get her husband snatched by someone who probably sleeps in a full face of makeup.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:This is a corny reality show with D list actors who couldn’t make the cut for 3AM Lifetime movies. Viral slop for the masses.



I know I sound like NY Times Pitchbot when I say this, but this is essentially what my 15 year old said when I brought this up the other day. "This is a distraction Mom. Keep your eye on the ball."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.


That IS shocking. Usha is the only trump crowd woman who looks good. That EK looks like she drank the poison brew the rest of them did.

I would not say Usha looks "good." She is frequently out with unbrushed hair, no makeup, and rumpled clothes. She looks human and doesn't have the horrific plastic surgery that most of them have, but she could stand to step it up.

And as I posted upthread, she recently has and looks much better, so I think she also suspects something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

Part of it, I wonder, is if she was just new to being a public figure and wasn't really sure how the whole "Being married to the VP of the USA" thing worked. Like she didn't realize how photographed she would be so she thought it was fine to go to the Pope's inaugural mass in no makeup. I am not sure that she realized, oh, I'm going to meet the Pope and there's going to be an HD video of me talking to him completely barefaced. She looked ill. No makeup is fine in real life but not on camera.

But yeah, it is suspicious she has started wearing 4" heels and pencil skirts a month after her husband started getting closer to Erika Kirk.

DP. It basically shows her arrogance. She just thought she would step into the role without thinking through what other people in the position do. Classic nerd with no ability to look beyond their own credentials. “Oh I’m a former scotus clerk and Yale grad of course I’ll be the best at this”. And now she’s going to get her husband snatched by someone who probably sleeps in a full face of makeup.

I do think that is part of it. I don't buy the "sweet little Usha" narrative they push where she never wanted this and she's not MAGA but she just had to support her husband. No one should buy that. C'mon. She's smarter than JD. She Lady Macbethed the shit out of him.

So, yes, I do think when she would go abroad earlier in her tenure as Second Lady wearing no makeup, pants/dresses that were dragging on the floor (bc she hadn't bothered to get them hemmed), and with hair that looked like she barely ran a comb through it, she was thinking something along the lines of "I don't NEED to focus on hair and makeup like other women."
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Usha Vance earns no ones respect.

Weird that Vance didn't tell his Protestant heretic audience the he'd wish they see the light and turn to Catholicism.


I refuse to believe there are 10,000 people that would show up anywhere for this dork and that phony widow. Is every local church goer and college kid paid $50 and free lunch to attend? The levels of astroturfing are so over the top.

You're deeply isolated from political reality then. The anti-immigration message delivered by Vance and the Trump team is HUGELY popular among average voters especially Gen Z. Like, I'm surprised you don't have any idea how thirsty people are for anti-immigration politics. It's the ONLY topic that can draw a crowd of 10K or 20K or 50K these days.


Indians I've spoken too consider the US immigration system stupid, and that they should crack down. India does not allow anything like this.


So? Is part of India's national identity as a beacon of liberty and a melting pot that welcomes people from around the world?

I'm not particularly interested in the opinions of another nationalist state like India.
Anonymous
Here we have Usha four-ish months ago:



No makeup, poorly fitting dress, hair pulled back in what appears to just be a messy bun. She looks fine.

Here we have her a month after Charlie Kirk's death:


Good makeup, she did something with the frizzy hair, pencil skirt, stilettos. She looks good.

What's the reason for stepping it up? Hmm...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.


That IS shocking. Usha is the only trump crowd woman who looks good. That EK looks like she drank the poison brew the rest of them did.

I would not say Usha looks "good." She is frequently out with unbrushed hair, no makeup, and rumpled clothes. She looks human and doesn't have the horrific plastic surgery that most of them have, but she could stand to step it up.

And as I posted upthread, she recently has and looks much better, so I think she also suspects something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

Part of it, I wonder, is if she was just new to being a public figure and wasn't really sure how the whole "Being married to the VP of the USA" thing worked. Like she didn't realize how photographed she would be so she thought it was fine to go to the Pope's inaugural mass in no makeup. I am not sure that she realized, oh, I'm going to meet the Pope and there's going to be an HD video of me talking to him completely barefaced. She looked ill. No makeup is fine in real life but not on camera.

But yeah, it is suspicious she has started wearing 4" heels and pencil skirts a month after her husband started getting closer to Erika Kirk.

JD was a senator long before becoming VP so the concept of public life wasn’t new to Usha. Her radar is definitely up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.


That IS shocking. Usha is the only trump crowd woman who looks good. That EK looks like she drank the poison brew the rest of them did.

I would not say Usha looks "good." She is frequently out with unbrushed hair, no makeup, and rumpled clothes. She looks human and doesn't have the horrific plastic surgery that most of them have, but she could stand to step it up.

And as I posted upthread, she recently has and looks much better, so I think she also suspects something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

Part of it, I wonder, is if she was just new to being a public figure and wasn't really sure how the whole "Being married to the VP of the USA" thing worked. Like she didn't realize how photographed she would be so she thought it was fine to go to the Pope's inaugural mass in no makeup. I am not sure that she realized, oh, I'm going to meet the Pope and there's going to be an HD video of me talking to him completely barefaced. She looked ill. No makeup is fine in real life but not on camera.

But yeah, it is suspicious she has started wearing 4" heels and pencil skirts a month after her husband started getting closer to Erika Kirk.

JD was a senator long before becoming VP so the concept of public life wasn’t new to Usha. Her radar is definitely up.

There's a difference between being married to the junior senator from Ohio and being married to the Vice President of the United States. I can't name many senator's spouses unless they're famous in their own right. How often are you seeing pics of, say, James Lankford's wife? I couldn't pick her out of a lineup.

But I do agree with you. Her radar is up.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

Except she's not. Her mom had to take a sabbatical to watch the kids because JD and Usha refused to cut back at work.

JD laughed about this being "the best part of marrying an Indian girl." So respectful.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

Erika I would argue has a better body than Usha. She is more athletic and toned. She also has pretty features.

Usha has pretty features as well.

They both need new stylists.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

Erika I would argue has a better body than Usha. She is more athletic and toned. She also has pretty features.

Usha has pretty features as well.

They both need new stylists.


Um, can we stop comparing their bodies?!

There is plenty of substance--or pack thereof--about them to discuss.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The most shocking takeaway from reading this thread is that people think Erika Kirk is more attractive than Usha Vance. At least the latter looks like a real person.

C’mon, Erika is very pretty. She may have an ugly soul, yet to be determined.

Usha is attractive. She’ll always just be attractive. Her kids aren’t adjusting well to public appearances. The older boy especially exhibits some coping mechanisms. Usha is a mom first. Nothing is normal, especially her husband.

Erika I would argue has a better body than Usha. She is more athletic and toned. She also has pretty features.

Usha has pretty features as well.

They both need new stylists.


Um, can we stop comparing their bodies?!

There is plenty of substance--or pack thereof--about them to discuss.


Be honest. “substance” is not when men care about most when selecting wives or affair partners. They care about sexual attraction.
Anonymous
“Usha, Usha….what is happening?!?! She’s gonna treat your brown babies like her ‘brown step-children’”

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQfwzlZAMDz/
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: