ECNL moving to school year part 2

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how much fake correspondence with GA leadership you're willing to concoct.

https://socalsoccer.com/threads/get-ready-folks.21527/page-2

Here is the email screenshot from GA to a club director.

The picture is blurry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how much fake correspondence with GA leadership you're willing to concoct.

https://socalsoccer.com/threads/get-ready-folks.21527/page-2

Here is the email screenshot from GA to a club director.

The picture is blurry.

Even if it wasn't, it would be too easy to fake. I saw a screenshot of a big 'club announcement' not too long ago that turned out to be fake as well.

Look, I hope GA/MLSN go SY for my own reasons, but this isn't good evidence and there just isn't any evidence out there yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how much fake correspondence with GA leadership you're willing to concoct.

https://socalsoccer.com/threads/get-ready-folks.21527/page-2

Here is the email screenshot from GA to a club director.

The picture is blurry.

Even if it wasn't, it would be too easy to fake. I saw a screenshot of a big 'club announcement' not too long ago that turned out to be fake as well.

Look, I hope GA/MLSN go SY for my own reasons, but this isn't good evidence and there just isn't any evidence out there yet.

That poster is credible. He posted email from SoCal long before it became public. GA is going to SY 100%.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how much fake correspondence with GA leadership you're willing to concoct.

https://socalsoccer.com/threads/get-ready-folks.21527/page-2

Here is the email screenshot from GA to a club director.

The picture is blurry.

Even if it wasn't, it would be too easy to fake. I saw a screenshot of a big 'club announcement' not too long ago that turned out to be fake as well.

Look, I hope GA/MLSN go SY for my own reasons, but this isn't good evidence and there just isn't any evidence out there yet.

While I guess it can't be ruled out entirely, for someone to take that on such a niche audience achieves what? That is a whole new level of loser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:GA is changing to 8/1 I think.

Response from GA director

The GA is changing the birth year cut off and aligning with other organizations. They announced it at the AGM this summer.

Unsubstantiated rumor.

Just another random guess.

Pretty sure it was talked about at the AGM that they would be changing but it was a sort of "off the cuff" remark in a broader conversation. Nothing is official, obviously, but I wouldn't just call it a "random guess" that they're going to change. It seems like a logical conclusion given everything we know so far. But of course, until we hear it straight from the Trish's mouth, its all just fun speculation.

It is one logical conclusion among many.

Some people have a vested interest in SY we get it. But with College, NWSL and potential MLS changes on the horizon literally ANYTHING can happen.

The one thing Ive found to hold true reguarding Youth Soccer is if you dont like the direction its going just wait a couple of weeks and everything will change.

…an usually toned down response from our friend, Ugh.

The person you're arguing with seems 100x more rational than you. You’re either a new u13 or maybe pre u13 parent or on ECNLs payroll. You hate MLSN and GA but are obsessing about what they do with their league. Why do you care? Very odd.

Not the pp, Q4 GA parent here, I care, and I would think many other Aug-Dec GA/MLSN parents care too .

If GA stays BY, I am taking her to a RL team.

100 percent! Not only for RAE but for no trap as well.

RAE mostly wouldn't be a thing for your kid. In fact your kid is a RAE survivor, where you reached the highest levels despite coaches perhaps favoring older kids on your team/club. That said, the real edge is playing with older players for all those years as well as an additional year of play would be the benefit with joining a younger team. At the same time, the risk is you may give up development opportunities in aligning with SY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how much fake correspondence with GA leadership you're willing to concoct.

https://socalsoccer.com/threads/get-ready-folks.21527/page-2

Here is the email screenshot from GA to a club director.

The picture is blurry.

Even if it wasn't, it would be too easy to fake. I saw a screenshot of a big 'club announcement' not too long ago that turned out to be fake as well.

Look, I hope GA/MLSN go SY for my own reasons, but this isn't good evidence and there just isn't any evidence out there yet.

While I guess it can't be ruled out entirely, for someone to take that on such a niche audience achieves what? That is a whole new level of loser.

That level of loser exists. (It was probably the person you're argueing with now)

About a year ago someone created an entire email then screenshoted it (so you coudnt quite tell if it was real or not) saying that SY was going to happen in the next 30 days or something like that.

The California parents called it out right away because SOCAL League was spelled So Cal League. Which was wrong on two levels. First if would be spelled SOCAL League. Second So Cal is never 2 words its always spelled Socal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how much fake correspondence with GA leadership you're willing to concoct.

https://socalsoccer.com/threads/get-ready-folks.21527/page-2

Here is the email screenshot from GA to a club director.

The picture is blurry.

Even if it wasn't, it would be too easy to fake. I saw a screenshot of a big 'club announcement' not too long ago that turned out to be fake as well.

Look, I hope GA/MLSN go SY for my own reasons, but this isn't good evidence and there just isn't any evidence out there yet.

Well you’re getting what you want GA definitely changing age groups up. That picture confirms it.

We still know nothing about MLSN.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how much fake correspondence with GA leadership you're willing to concoct.

https://socalsoccer.com/threads/get-ready-folks.21527/page-2

Here is the email screenshot from GA to a club director.

The picture is blurry.

Even if it wasn't, it would be too easy to fake. I saw a screenshot of a big 'club announcement' not too long ago that turned out to be fake as well.

Look, I hope GA/MLSN go SY for my own reasons, but this isn't good evidence and there just isn't any evidence out there yet.

While I guess it can't be ruled out entirely, for someone to take that on such a niche audience achieves what? That is a whole new level of loser.

That level of loser exists. (It was probably the person you're argueing with now)

About a year ago someone created an entire email then screenshoted it (so you coudnt quite tell if it was real or not) saying that SY was going to happen in the next 30 days or something like that.

The California parents called it out right away because SOCAL League was spelled So Cal League. Which was wrong on two levels. First if would be spelled SOCAL League. Second So Cal is never 2 words its always spelled Socal.

SY was announced by the masses? I’m not sure when that was sent around but obviously the info ended up being true?

Not understanding how you can say everyone’s info isn’t accurate because one person “faked” an email with factual information they came out later than stated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how much fake correspondence with GA leadership you're willing to concoct.

https://socalsoccer.com/threads/get-ready-folks.21527/page-2

Here is the email screenshot from GA to a club director.

According to that email, GA club directors should know the truth. Can someone confirm this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how much fake correspondence with GA leadership you're willing to concoct.

https://socalsoccer.com/threads/get-ready-folks.21527/page-2

Here is the email screenshot from GA to a club director.

The picture is blurry.

Even if it wasn't, it would be too easy to fake. I saw a screenshot of a big 'club announcement' not too long ago that turned out to be fake as well.

Look, I hope GA/MLSN go SY for my own reasons, but this isn't good evidence and there just isn't any evidence out there yet.

While I guess it can't be ruled out entirely, for someone to take that on such a niche audience achieves what? That is a whole new level of loser.

That level of loser exists. (It was probably the person you're argueing with now)

About a year ago someone created an entire email then screenshoted it (so you coudnt quite tell if it was real or not) saying that SY was going to happen in the next 30 days or something like that.

The California parents called it out right away because SOCAL League was spelled So Cal League. Which was wrong on two levels. First if would be spelled SOCAL League. Second So Cal is never 2 words its always spelled Socal.

SY was announced by the masses? I’m not sure when that was sent around but obviously the info ended up being true?

Not understanding how you can say everyone’s info isn’t accurate because one person “faked” an email with factual information they came out later than stated.

You would believe someone that faked an email?

Come on...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how much fake correspondence with GA leadership you're willing to concoct.

https://socalsoccer.com/threads/get-ready-folks.21527/page-2

Here is the email screenshot from GA to a club director.

The picture is blurry.

Even if it wasn't, it would be too easy to fake. I saw a screenshot of a big 'club announcement' not too long ago that turned out to be fake as well.

Look, I hope GA/MLSN go SY for my own reasons, but this isn't good evidence and there just isn't any evidence out there yet.

While I guess it can't be ruled out entirely, for someone to take that on such a niche audience achieves what? That is a whole new level of loser.

That level of loser exists. (It was probably the person you're argueing with now)

About a year ago someone created an entire email then screenshoted it (so you coudnt quite tell if it was real or not) saying that SY was going to happen in the next 30 days or something like that.

The California parents called it out right away because SOCAL League was spelled So Cal League. Which was wrong on two levels. First if would be spelled SOCAL League. Second So Cal is never 2 words its always spelled Socal.

SY was announced by the masses? I’m not sure when that was sent around but obviously the info ended up being true?

Not understanding how you can say everyone’s info isn’t accurate because one person “faked” an email with factual information they came out later than stated.

You would believe someone that faked an email?

Come on...

If the information was true I’d think about questioning what they posted out is all I’m saying.

Also was poster from so called forum same person? I cant see the photo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's amazing how much fake correspondence with GA leadership you're willing to concoct.

https://socalsoccer.com/threads/get-ready-folks.21527/page-2

Here is the email screenshot from GA to a club director.

According to that email, GA club directors should know the truth. Can someone confirm this?

I posted about it before. My DOC said to me after the GA meeting he is 99.9% certain they are switching to SY, but says the meeting "did not go into details" about the switch.

My feeling was there was some kind of gag order from the league so I didn't want to press him further, Which is now consistent with what the screen shot is saying.

[Anonymous]

OMG. The fact that there was a thread that got locked because it was a drain on the server and now folks posting links back to posts in 2024 is just bananas...over 1100 pages about this...

I lived through this as a parent of a kid who is a 2006, June birthday. He had a great team and then things got switch to BY and he was one of only 3 kids left on his team.

DD is a early January 2009 B-Day. She played up for a couple of years and is now playing with her age group.

No matter how you slice it, there will also be those that feel that they are slighted...there has to be cutoffs somewhere. If your kid is good, they are good. They will get the eyes on them that they need.

Yeah, bio banding and what not...but my favorite example of all of this is my cousin who has one kid born on 12/31 and another born on 1/1...geez. What a difference a few hours make...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG. The fact that there was a thread that got locked because it was a drain on the server and now folks posting links back to posts in 2024 is just bananas...over 1100 pages about this...

I lived through this as a parent of a kid who is a 2006, June birthday. He had a great team and then things got switch to BY and he was one of only 3 kids left on his team.

DD is a early January 2009 B-Day. She played up for a couple of years and is now playing with her age group.

No matter how you slice it, there will also be those that feel that they are slighted...there has to be cutoffs somewhere. If your kid is good, they are good. They will get the eyes on them that they need.

Yeah, bio banding and what not...but my favorite example of all of this is my cousin who has one kid born on 12/31 and another born on 1/1...geez. What a difference a few hours make...

I’d be trying to make a deal with the doctors for that 1-1 bday lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:OMG. The fact that there was a thread that got locked because it was a drain on the server and now folks posting links back to posts in 2024 is just bananas...over 1100 pages about this...

I lived through this as a parent of a kid who is a 2006, June birthday. He had a great team and then things got switch to BY and he was one of only 3 kids left on his team.

DD is a early January 2009 B-Day. She played up for a couple of years and is now playing with her age group.

No matter how you slice it, there will also be those that feel that they are slighted...there has to be cutoffs somewhere. If your kid is good, they are good. They will get the eyes on them that they need.

Yeah, bio banding and what not...but my favorite example of all of this is my cousin who has one kid born on 12/31 and another born on 1/1...geez. What a difference a few hours make...

You have to goto the last page of that forum posted not the first page.

But this is a big deal which is why people argue and fight over any cut off date because it makes a huge difference for how teams will be formed.