"of course UVA is T25, it's currently T24 by USNWR, the gold standard of ranking services and no 4 of all public schools in America. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/uva-6968" Post replied to you dolt. Now move along. |
+1 This is how I view schools. Some people don't even consider a few of the categories here. |
The poster of this must have kids at Wake, Tufts or BU -
If you look at outcomes, kids graduating from those 3 schools are not in same league as kids from Columbia/Cornell/ND/Rice and even WashU/Emory. Bizarre. But whatever floats your boat. Your posting this here, doesn't make the school "better". But maybe it makes you feel better? Tiers don't even matter unless you are defensive about your choices. Which perhaps you are. __________________________________ Personally I split by category (Private/Public/SLAC) and then go by tiers rather than specific "ranks" which I find a bit silly, even with tiers the cutoffs can be fuzzy, but better than a literal numeric list. Private top tier: HYPSM Private second tier: Brown, Cal Tech, Chicago, Dartmouth, Duke, Johns Hopkins, Northwestern, Vanderbilt, Penn Private third tier: Boston U, Carnegie Mellon, Columbia, Cornell, Emory, Georgetown, Notre Dame, NYU, Rice, Tufts, USC (Southern Cal), Wake Forest, Washington U (St. Louis) Public top tier: Michigan (Ann Arbor), UC Berkeley, UCLA, Virginia (UVA) Public second tier: Florida, Georgia Tech, Illinois - Urbana Champaign, North Carolina (UNC Chapel Hill), Texas (UT Austin), UC Davis, UC Irvine, UCSB, UCSD, William & Mary, Wisconsin Public third tier: Many... like 30 SLAC top tier: Amherst, Pomona, Swarthmore, Wellesley, Williams SLAC second tier: Bowdoin, Carleton College, Claremont McKenna, Middlebury, Smith, US Military Academy - West Point, US Naval SLAC third tier: Barnard, Bates, Colby, Colgate, Davidson, Hamilton, Haverford, Richmond, US Air Force Academy, Wesleyan |
If you mention a few anecdotal cases, other schools do the same. Also, it's not just about a few grades; context matters in the whole application. |
Emory |
How can anyone answer this? Depends on major, kid, ....
And most people don't send exact twins to two different schools and compare. |
I think whomever posted this meant to include BC rather than BU. And with that change, historically all of these schools are ranked in thr 20 to 30 range for literally decades. Btw, you seem like a miserable person, Emory mom. |
I’m not Emory mom? I just know about how it works at our private. Why do you care so much? |
Because I took 10 seconds to respond to your nasty post, I care so much? Btw, I have two kids at what are considered the top privates in our city, and there is literally no difference in the kids accepted to these schools. Indeed, in the past two cycles, the BC, Wake, and Tufts kids have been more accomplished than the Emory kids because those schools are seen as both rigorous and social, and accordingly more desirable. Parchment results support this for cross admits. |
I don’t know anyone that considers Tufts a social school. |
They’re all good schools in their own unique ways. I would be happy to have my kid at Emory, Tufts, Wake, etc., any of them, as long as it’s a good fit. It doesn’t matter where the kids’ classmates are going or the profile that got them in there. What works best for your kid? |
You must have a limited social circle. |
DP, I think it has changed a little in modern landscaping. Nowadays, BU attracts a strong student body due to its location, engineering and medical schools, along with its status as a research powerhouse. |
Ha. Right?!?! |
Same. I don’t get this weird arbitrary tiering. BU? In the same list as Rice and Columbia? What’s the point? |