VA Democratic House candidate performed sex acts online for tips

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the liberal mindset, sex work is a totally legitimate side hustle.

SO TRUE. It has now become okay to sell yourself for money.

yea, look at Melania Trump, former FLOTUS.

I mean, she might have posed naked but was she on video giving BJs and performing anal sex for "tokens" from a live audience? I think Ms. Gibson has upped the ante here.

well, tbf, FLOTUS is national, whereas this woman is running for a little district state rep where no one but Virginians might care.

There were some huge billboards of FLOTUS' soft core porn pix put up across the country. Uber embarrassing for the country.

But unlike Gibson's, those pics weren't explicit. Otherwise they wouldn't be on a billboard.

I don't even like the Trumps so I'm not sure why I'm taking issue with comparing Gibson with Melania. In fact, have at it. This is certainly less embarrassing for the US than Melania was.

Unlike those pix, most people won't see her videos, including minors.

yes, that's the point. If Rs weren't embarrassed about Melania, then why should Dems be embarrassed by this woman? I think what she did was completely idiotic, and she probably will not win, but in the grand scheme of things, Rs really have no leg to stand on here, with their Chief Pu$$y Grabber and Rapist.

Considering Dems put those billboards of Melania up, I don't think you should be too worried about minors seeing them. If they were that bad, would a patriotic Dem really have plastered them everywhere for children to see? Actually, don't answer that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the liberal mindset, sex work is a totally legitimate side hustle.

SO TRUE. It has now become okay to sell yourself for money.

yea, look at Melania Trump, former FLOTUS.

I mean, she might have posed naked but was she on video giving BJs and performing anal sex for "tokens" from a live audience? I think Ms. Gibson has upped the ante here.

well, tbf, FLOTUS is national, whereas this woman is running for a little district state rep where no one but Virginians might care.

There were some huge billboards of FLOTUS' soft core porn pix put up across the country. Uber embarrassing for the country.

But unlike Gibson's, those pics weren't explicit. Otherwise they wouldn't be on a billboard.

I don't even like the Trumps so I'm not sure why I'm taking issue with comparing Gibson with Melania. In fact, have at it. This is certainly less embarrassing for the US than Melania was.

Unlike those pix, most people won't see her videos, including minors.

yes, that's the point. If Rs weren't embarrassed about Melania, then why should Dems be embarrassed by this woman? I think what she did was completely idiotic, and she probably will not win, but in the grand scheme of things, Rs really have no leg to stand on here, with their Chief Pu$$y Grabber and Rapist.

Considering Dems put those billboards of Melania up, I don't think you should be too worried about minors seeing them. If they were that bad, would a patriotic Dem really have plastered them everywhere for children to see? Actually, don't answer that.

Ds or the Lincoln project?

[Anonymous]

This story is insane.

Their kids look early elementary school aged, so sorry for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

Is this the kind of person you want as an elected official?

I mean, a rapist was president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the liberal mindset, sex work is a totally legitimate side hustle.

SO TRUE. It has now become okay to sell yourself for money.

yea, look at Melania Trump, former FLOTUS.

I mean, she might have posed naked but was she on video giving BJs and performing anal sex for "tokens" from a live audience? I think Ms. Gibson has upped the ante here.

well, tbf, FLOTUS is national, whereas this woman is running for a little district state rep where no one but Virginians might care.

There were some huge billboards of FLOTUS' soft core porn pix put up across the country. Uber embarrassing for the country.

But unlike Gibson's, those pics weren't explicit. Otherwise they wouldn't be on a billboard.

I don't even like the Trumps so I'm not sure why I'm taking issue with comparing Gibson with Melania. In fact, have at it. This is certainly less embarrassing for the US than Melania was.

Unlike those pix, most people won't see her videos, including minors.

yes, that's the point. If Rs weren't embarrassed about Melania, then why should Dems be embarrassed by this woman? I think what she did was completely idiotic, and she probably will not win, but in the grand scheme of things, Rs really have no leg to stand on here, with their Chief Pu$$y Grabber and Rapist.

Considering Dems put those billboards of Melania up, I don't think you should be too worried about minors seeing them. If they were that bad, would a patriotic Dem really have plastered them everywhere for children to see? Actually, don't answer that.

Ds or the Lincoln project?

Is there a difference? Didn't they both support - and continue to support - the same agenda?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who cares? All she did was violate the terms and conditions of some web site -- seems like a total non-issue.

Is this the kind of person you want as an elected official?

I mean, a rapist was president.

Clinton or Trump? Or both?

I wonder if we ever had any other rapists in the WH. I suspect so, sadly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This story is insane.

Their kids look early elementary school aged, so sorry for them.

You act like she’s a terrible mom because she had sex with her husband. What she did was really dumb because 1. They didn’t cover their faces. That kind of baffles me because they both have professional jobs. Masks would have made them much more difficult to identify. 2. She is running for office.
But neither of those things make them bad parents on any kind of day to day basis. It was just stupid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the liberal mindset, sex work is a totally legitimate side hustle.

SO TRUE. It has now become okay to sell yourself for money.

yea, look at Melania Trump, former FLOTUS.

I mean, she might have posed naked but was she on video giving BJs and performing anal sex for "tokens" from a live audience? I think Ms. Gibson has upped the ante here.

well, tbf, FLOTUS is national, whereas this woman is running for a little district state rep where no one but Virginians might care.

There were some huge billboards of FLOTUS' soft core porn pix put up across the country. Uber embarrassing for the country.

But unlike Gibson's, those pics weren't explicit. Otherwise they wouldn't be on a billboard.

I don't even like the Trumps so I'm not sure why I'm taking issue with comparing Gibson with Melania. In fact, have at it. This is certainly less embarrassing for the US than Melania was.

Unlike those pix, most people won't see her videos, including minors.

yes, that's the point. If Rs weren't embarrassed about Melania, then why should Dems be embarrassed by this woman? I think what she did was completely idiotic, and she probably will not win, but in the grand scheme of things, Rs really have no leg to stand on here, with their Chief Pu$$y Grabber and Rapist.

Considering Dems put those billboards of Melania up, I don't think you should be too worried about minors seeing them. If they were that bad, would a patriotic Dem really have plastered them everywhere for children to see? Actually, don't answer that.

Ds or the Lincoln project?

Is there a difference? Didn't they both support - and continue to support - the same agenda?

The Lincoln Project was started by Republicans. And they were ruthless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This story is insane.

Their kids look early elementary school aged, so sorry for them.

You act like she’s a terrible mom because she had sex with her husband. What she did was really dumb because 1. They didn’t cover their faces. That kind of baffles me because they both have professional jobs. Masks would have made them much more difficult to identify. 2. She is running for office.
But neither of those things make them bad parents on any kind of day to day basis. It was just stupid.

99% of dcum women don't have sex with their Hs and the other 1% has sex once every 3 months, so of course sex with your H while not trying to actively reproduce is offensive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do I think this is worse than no gun restrictions, an abortion ban, a roll back of LGTBQ rights, and no regard for the environment? No!

I agree with all that but this woman has clearly demonstrated a serious lack of good judgment so I wouldn't trust her to represent me on a state level or probably any level.

This. Those poor kids! Can you imagine going to school?!!!

I feel bad for the dog

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the liberal mindset, sex work is a totally legitimate side hustle.

SO TRUE. It has now become okay to sell yourself for money.

yea, look at Melania Trump, former FLOTUS.

I mean, she might have posed naked but was she on video giving BJs and performing anal sex for "tokens" from a live audience? I think Ms. Gibson has upped the ante here.

well, tbf, FLOTUS is national, whereas this woman is running for a little district state rep where no one but Virginians might care.

There were some huge billboards of FLOTUS' soft core porn pix put up across the country. Uber embarrassing for the country.

But unlike Gibson's, those pics weren't explicit. Otherwise they wouldn't be on a billboard.

I don't even like the Trumps so I'm not sure why I'm taking issue with comparing Gibson with Melania. In fact, have at it. This is certainly less embarrassing for the US than Melania was.

Unlike those pix, most people won't see her videos, including minors.

yes, that's the point. If Rs weren't embarrassed about Melania, then why should Dems be embarrassed by this woman? I think what she did was completely idiotic, and she probably will not win, but in the grand scheme of things, Rs really have no leg to stand on here, with their Chief Pu$$y Grabber and Rapist.

Considering Dems put those billboards of Melania up, I don't think you should be too worried about minors seeing them. If they were that bad, would a patriotic Dem really have plastered them everywhere for children to see? Actually, don't answer that.

Ds or the Lincoln project?

Is there a difference? Didn't they both support - and continue to support - the same agenda?

The Lincoln Project was started by Republicans. And they were ruthless.

Correct. But they still support the same agenda. So whether the Lincoln Project put up the billboards or the DNC, the logic still holds. They intentionally displayed "soft porn" in public for minors to see. Of course, the soft porn wasn't explicit and that was the genesis of my jumping in to comment. Cheers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Either way, there is nothing she did that was illegal. Live and let live.

I haven't read that one person has claimed what she did was illegal.
Immoral, yes. IMO. Clearly, not everyone here agrees it was immoral. And, that is part of the issue with society today.

This is certainly not the type of person I would want to represent me as an elected official. She has demonstrated poor judgment - not only by her behavior (which she clearly tried to keep hush hush), but then her decision to run for office knowing what was out there. And, then, claiming to be some kind of victim because people found the videos and WaPo reported on it.

I would also question the type of issues she supports. After reading comments here, I am starting to understand why there are people out there who think books like Gender Queer should be carried in school libraries. If people here think what she has done is just fine and wouldn't have a problem with her as a rep, why not have sexually explicit material in school libraries? And, I bring this up because these are the types of issues being debated at the local and state level. I doubt I would agree with her on the issues she supports.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This story is insane.

Their kids look early elementary school aged, so sorry for them.

You act like she’s a terrible mom because she had sex with her husband. What she did was really dumb because 1. They didn’t cover their faces. That kind of baffles me because they both have professional jobs. Masks would have made them much more difficult to identify. 2. She is running for office.
But neither of those things make them bad parents on any kind of day to day basis. It was just stupid.

She may not be a "terrible mom" but I cannot believe that she would want her children to know about this. Why do this kind of stuff when you have kids that could discover this crap? She is setting a poor example for her children. It is just sleazy.

[Anonymous]

I literally don't care what any consenting adults do in their bedroom. Republican or Democrat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the liberal mindset, sex work is a totally legitimate side hustle.

SO TRUE. It has now become okay to sell yourself for money.

yea, look at Melania Trump, former FLOTUS.

I mean, she might have posed naked but was she on video giving BJs and performing anal sex for "tokens" from a live audience? I think Ms. Gibson has upped the ante here.

well, tbf, FLOTUS is national, whereas this woman is running for a little district state rep where no one but Virginians might care.

There were some huge billboards of FLOTUS' soft core porn pix put up across the country. Uber embarrassing for the country.

But unlike Gibson's, those pics weren't explicit. Otherwise they wouldn't be on a billboard.

I don't even like the Trumps so I'm not sure why I'm taking issue with comparing Gibson with Melania. In fact, have at it. This is certainly less embarrassing for the US than Melania was.

Unlike those pix, most people won't see her videos, including minors.

yes, that's the point. If Rs weren't embarrassed about Melania, then why should Dems be embarrassed by this woman? I think what she did was completely idiotic, and she probably will not win, but in the grand scheme of things, Rs really have no leg to stand on here, with their Chief Pu$$y Grabber and Rapist.

Considering Dems put those billboards of Melania up, I don't think you should be too worried about minors seeing them. If they were that bad, would a patriotic Dem really have plastered them everywhere for children to see? Actually, don't answer that.

Ds or the Lincoln project?

Is there a difference? Didn't they both support - and continue to support - the same agenda?

The Lincoln Project was started by Republicans. And they were ruthless.

Correct. But they still support the same agenda. So whether the Lincoln Project put up the billboards or the DNC, the logic still holds. They intentionally displayed "soft porn" in public for minors to see. Of course, the soft porn wasn't explicit and that was the genesis of my jumping in to comment. Cheers.

PP said Ds put up the billboards.

We don’t know that. Where were they put up? Citation?