Not controlled studies. This explains why problematic. https://www.childrens.com/health-wellness/can-covid-19-cause-diabetes-in-children |
You're right. These are not controlled study. It's a total mystery HOW IT IT POSSIBLE that these kids are suddenly, for some reason, after having contracted covid, also contracting pediatric diabetes, whereas before the pandemic there was not a similar number of kids getting pediatric diabetes out of nowhere. IT IS A MYSTERY WRAPPED IN AN ENIGMA SEALED WITH SHERLOCK HOLMES'S COCAINE. How could this be happening? Is it dogs?
You're totally right. Everything is fine. |
I still care and worry about kids getting COVID, diabetes, etc. Seems nothing will convince you otherwise anyway. |
What you posted isn’t even that reassuring, nor does it minimize possible long-term consequences of pediatric COVID. From your source. “It has been suggested that the virus that causes COVID‑19 can directly attack beta cells, the cells in the pancreas that produce insulin. What happens after the virus infects beta cells isn't completely understood yet. If your child had COVID‑19, it's important to monitor their health for any potential lasting effects and to contact their pediatrician with any concerns. Lastly, Dr. Adhikari encourages parents to continue to take steps to reduce the risk of COVID‑19 infection.” |
Could be because of lack of physical activity and access to nutritious food when school were closed. |
Correlation is not causation is what they drum into your head if you get an education on research and do these things for a living.
Why? Because otherwise you really just don’t know and many times the “obvious” conclusion does not turn out to be correct. Sorry that’s so upsetting. If a definitive connection is made, the next question would be how much is the elevated risk. Then parents can do something with that information. |
Why is posting information that points out the research isn’t definitive on this topic so threatening? Shouldn’t that be good news? Of course most of us want to avoid covid infection for ourselves and our kids and take various precautions that make sense for us. And it’s also possible to live in a world where a person is not completely hysterical about the thought of an infection happening either. Both things can be true. |
Yup. https://www.healthline.com/health-news/experts-criticize-cdc-report-on-covid-19-and-diabetes-risk-in-kids Worth further study but the study they did was crap. |
Okay, but I'm pretty sure it's being caused by the masks. Or by the books about gender identity. The kids had covid and then they got diabetes. If the diabetes was caused by lack of food and exercise, you should also be seeing it in kids who never had covid. That was not what the study showed. But I'm sure they wanted to mute the message that covid had serious risks for kids so mission accomplished I guess. |
Moron. Kids are not getting type 2 after covid. They’re being diagnosed with type 1. This is not at all shocking. Type 1 is an autoimmune condition triggered by ANY virus. But go on with you’re uniformed spouting of “facts” |
So this was one of the issues with the CDC study. They pooled all types of diabetes together. “In reaction to the report, several public health experts have highlighted the study’s limitations: The analysis did not account for childhood obesity, other underlying conditions, medications, race or ethnicity, and it pooled all types of diabetes together.” |
I’m not threatened by it, however, using this to justify allowing kids to become infected when we still don’t know the full scope of long-term effects is problematic. As the article states, we should still reduce the risk of infecting children. And yes one can still be proactively cautious yet not hysterical. For example, my kids are masking indoors during this current surge. Why not mitigate the risk of contracting and spreading COVID? |
Not everyone shares your risk assessment point of view. Not everyone is valuing the trade offs regarding various risks in the same way you are. Not everyone is making the same decisions about how to reduce risks in their own lives as you are. This does not mean they are morons or covid deniers or Trumpsters or anti-maskers or mouth breathers. Reasonable people really can disagree on this topic. The time period of mandating everyone behave exactly the way you would like them to behave is over. |
Right. Some people have chosen not to be cautious at all right now, and that's part of why Arlington's numbers are so high and why some APS kindergarteners are watching movies in class instead of learning. If you care about school, now might be a good time to consider encouraging your family to take additional precautions so that this surge ends as quickly as possible. End of year testing for SOLs and AP exams is coming up, and various end of year social celebrations that kids usually really enjoy, and there's going to be considerable disruption if a bunch of teachers and kids are missing out because they have covid. I mean, you do you, but since you care about school so much, it seems like those disruptions are things you would want to avoid. |
Are you still believing this crap? If only people masked harder? Our numbers are the same as places that haven't masked in over a year and the same as places that masked harder than here (although those places are difficult to find because of mask fanatics like yourself). The only reason kids are watching movies in class in Arlington is because of the hysterical reaction to the pandemic. My relatives in Texas are actually having classes in school. If you want to mask forever (which is what you're pushing, considering COVID is never going away), then you're free to do so yourself. You can keep all the rituals you want. |