“Stuff Some Adults Don’t Want You to Read” at Langley

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t just the principal. The Region 1 superintendent (Doug Tyson) issued a separate apology as well. It’s just sad they feel the need to apologize for looking for creative ways to encourage kids to read.


There are many, many other ways to better encourage folks to read than this. C'mon - be better.


Agreed. There are healthy ways to encourage kids to read without putting them against their parents.


+2
And MUCH better written books to encourage kids to read.


Much better written than what? Which books in the Langley display do you believe were poorly written?



Crickets.

Dumb a$$ book banners can't be bothered to actually READ any books. Only ban them.



Beloved had only slightly better writing than the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit edition, but did have more titillation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:That was the title of a sign in the Langley High library displaying some of the books that the Trumpkins don’t want kids reading like “Beloved” and “Maus.” Of course some Langley parents complained and the principal issued a groveling letter apologizing for “poor judgement” and removing the display.

Seriously, WTF? It was a clever way to encourage kids to read! And do these parents have any idea how many teachers and administrators are going to steer clear of the school when they hear how heavy-handed the parents can be?

Whatever
Full liberal wisdom is on full display daily in democratic run compounds

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t just the principal. The Region 1 superintendent (Doug Tyson) issued a separate apology as well. It’s just sad they feel the need to apologize for looking for creative ways to encourage kids to read.


There are many, many other ways to better encourage folks to read than this. C'mon - be better.


Agreed. There are healthy ways to encourage kids to read without putting them against their parents.


+2
And MUCH better written books to encourage kids to read.


Much better written than what? Which books in the Langley display do you believe were poorly written?



Crickets.

Dumb a$$ book banners can't be bothered to actually READ any books. Only ban them.



Beloved had only slightly better writing than the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit edition, but did have more titillation.


LOL, it won a Pulitzer and was a National Book Award finalist, but I’m sure you know better.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t just the principal. The Region 1 superintendent (Doug Tyson) issued a separate apology as well. It’s just sad they feel the need to apologize for looking for creative ways to encourage kids to read.


There are many, many other ways to better encourage folks to read than this. C'mon - be better.


Agreed. There are healthy ways to encourage kids to read without putting them against their parents.


+2
And MUCH better written books to encourage kids to read.


Much better written than what? Which books in the Langley display do you believe were poorly written?



Crickets.

Dumb a$$ book banners can't be bothered to actually READ any books. Only ban them.



Beloved had only slightly better writing than the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit edition, but did have more titillation.


LOL, it won a Pulitzer and was a National Book Award finalist, but I’m sure you know better.


The narrative style in Beloved is straight out of 80's cheesefest "Highlander" jumping around in time and space so much and blending multiple viewpoints that the reader might as well be riding in the TARDIS.

Beloved depicts rape and violence towards women, described in such detail, so often, as to cause a reader to wonder if Toni was really condemning it, or if this "feminist" had some sort of bizarre masochistic fetish? Feminist fiction has often left me wondering that. Honestly, Toni Morrison's novels seem more like an attempt to shock, stupefy, and play mind games with her readers than to actually tell stories.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Bottom line--the parental-control-over-public-schools movement is a successful Republican tactic to fire up voters. It worked for Youngkin, and it will work for other politicians in future elections. While we all sit here exercising our 1st amendment rights by having spirited discussions about what is or isn't taught in public schools, Republican strategists are laughing all the way to the polls.


It will backfire in NoVa if it becomes 100% associated with crazy Trumpkins looking to pick silly fights, and it makes it harder to attract talented staff to Langley. There are already disincentives to work there given how expensive housing is near the school and its reputation for meddling parents. The parents who run with these things live in a bubble and think that what gets people excited in Alabama, or even Purcellville, is going to resonate in Fairfax, and generally it doesn't.


DP. You must be joking. Do you have any idea just how many moderates are sick to death of these stunts? Sorry, to disappoint, but Trump and “Trumpkins” have nothing to do with this. Why do you think Youngkin won? Because so many people - including a lot of Biden voters - are done with this “equity/woke” BS infecting our public schools. Talk about living in a bubble - you seem not to have learned anything at all. See you at the polls this fall.

Oh, and btw - Langley is one of the most sought after schools in which to teach. Inform yourself a little better.


Because suburban mommies threw temper tantrums and screeched about how they were “forced” to become one issue voters because their kids had virtual learning during a pandemic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t just the principal. The Region 1 superintendent (Doug Tyson) issued a separate apology as well. It’s just sad they feel the need to apologize for looking for creative ways to encourage kids to read.


There are many, many other ways to better encourage folks to read than this. C'mon - be better.


Agreed. There are healthy ways to encourage kids to read without putting them against their parents.


+2
And MUCH better written books to encourage kids to read.


Much better written than what? Which books in the Langley display do you believe were poorly written?



Crickets.

Dumb a$$ book banners can't be bothered to actually READ any books. Only ban them.



Beloved had only slightly better writing than the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit edition, but did have more titillation.


LOL, it won a Pulitzer and was a National Book Award finalist, but I’m sure you know better.


The narrative style in Beloved is straight out of 80's cheesefest "Highlander" jumping around in time and space so much and blending multiple viewpoints that the reader might as well be riding in the TARDIS.

Beloved depicts rape and violence towards women, described in such detail, so often, as to cause a reader to wonder if Toni was really condemning it, or if this "feminist" had some sort of bizarre masochistic fetish? Feminist fiction has often left me wondering that. Honestly, Toni Morrison's novels seem more like an attempt to shock, stupefy, and play mind games with her readers than to actually tell stories.


Sure. And slavery was actually a good things for slaves. They were never raped or beaten or brutalized.
Anonymous
The laughable thing here is that parents who are secure in their own values don’t fear their children being exposed to books. They are not afraid to talk to their children about new ideas, and are not afraid of having in their values challenged. The parents who want to prevent their kids from reading these books are the ones who know, deep down, that their own values are wrong.

Let’s get real. The people opposed to Gender Queer aren’t worried their kids will be traumatized by a drawing, they’re afraid their kids will catch the LGBTQ.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Of course it was at Langley. At any other high school in this region, parents would be applauding the librarian, but the rich white bored moms at Langley are outraged. Too many similarities to Loudon families.


I am a Langley parent and I don’t think most Langley parents care one way or the other about the sign. As my daughter said when I asked her what the sign said, “I don’t even go to the library so I don’t know what you are talking about.” LOL. I believe this issue came from a Cooper parent during a rising 9th grader parent meeting. I believe (but I’m not 100% sure) that this parent is the same one who took her kids to Fortestville Elementary on the Tuesday after Youngkin issued his mask Executive Order and demanded her kids go maskless, then filmed herself ranting about the injustice of it all when the school denied her request. Now she’s doing this with the book issue. I wonder what will come next?


The majority of parents at Langley had no issue with this. It’s a small group of women, including this one mentioned that come up with this shit. This one at Forestville didn’t act alone, there was a Langley parent who helped and together they spew all this anti-masking, anti-vaccine shit and it’s all because they can’t get over the fact Trump lost!


This unhinged vocal minority of parents is tearing apart our community for their own political goals. I really hope the majority of reasonable people shows up soon.


DP. I hate to break it to you, but the unhinged vocal minority are those who are gleeful that our public school libraries see nothing wrong with providing kids graphically sexual books. The majority of reasonable people are those who are simply asking to keep those books out of the schools. You can still bring your kids to public libraries and make sure they get their fair share of graphic sex.


No, honey, YOU are the minority in the school district. I know you think otherwise, since All Your Privileged Friends agree with you and you live in a self-created echo chamber, but You. Are. Wrong.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t just the principal. The Region 1 superintendent (Doug Tyson) issued a separate apology as well. It’s just sad they feel the need to apologize for looking for creative ways to encourage kids to read.


There are many, many other ways to better encourage folks to read than this. C'mon - be better.


Agreed. There are healthy ways to encourage kids to read without putting them against their parents.


+2
And MUCH better written books to encourage kids to read.


Much better written than what? Which books in the Langley display do you believe were poorly written?



Crickets.

Dumb a$$ book banners can't be bothered to actually READ any books. Only ban them.



Beloved had only slightly better writing than the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit edition, but did have more titillation.


LOL, it won a Pulitzer and was a National Book Award finalist, but I’m sure you know better.


The narrative style in Beloved is straight out of 80's cheesefest "Highlander" jumping around in time and space so much and blending multiple viewpoints that the reader might as well be riding in the TARDIS.

Beloved depicts rape and violence towards women, described in such detail, so often, as to cause a reader to wonder if Toni was really condemning it, or if this "feminist" had some sort of bizarre masochistic fetish? Feminist fiction has often left me wondering that. Honestly, Toni Morrison's novels seem more like an attempt to shock, stupefy, and play mind games with her readers than to actually tell stories.


Sure. And slavery was actually a good things for slaves. They were never raped or beaten or brutalized.


What does that have to do with the quality of Toni Morrison's writing?

Toni attempts to manipulate the reader in an obvious manner with zero subtly whatsoever. She may as well write on the cover " I am trying to make you feel dumber than I am! " Unfortunately for Toni, if a reader knows you're trying to manipulate them, no amount of style, imagery, or endorsements from critics is going to work. There is a saying-"A tactic known is a tactic blown".

Try reading her other works and you can see the same tricks at play right away.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The laughable thing here is that parents who are secure in their own values don’t fear their children being exposed to books. They are not afraid to talk to their children about new ideas, and are not afraid of having in their values challenged. The parents who want to prevent their kids from reading these books are the ones who know, deep down, that their own values are wrong.

Let’s get real. The people opposed to Gender Queer aren’t worried their kids will be traumatized by a drawing, they’re afraid their kids will catch the LGBTQ.


But doesn't it also go both ways? I don't support the R or the L banning as a matter of principle. It's the whole first amendment - you have to allow speech you don't like to protect the speech you do like - because we don't want what is able to be said to depend on who happens to be the arbiter because it could be an arbiter we don't like.

But anyway - I don't get my panties in a twist if books are banned either - because it's not going to affect my kids - and it does happen on both the right and the left. They can still read whatever the hell they want, and I also teach them critical thinking and to have a healthy distrust of authority

The people who are really against censorship should be coming out against the censorship on the left too - and there have been plenty of articles linked about that here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t just the principal. The Region 1 superintendent (Doug Tyson) issued a separate apology as well. It’s just sad they feel the need to apologize for looking for creative ways to encourage kids to read.


There are many, many other ways to better encourage folks to read than this. C'mon - be better.


Agreed. There are healthy ways to encourage kids to read without putting them against their parents.


+2
And MUCH better written books to encourage kids to read.


Much better written than what? Which books in the Langley display do you believe were poorly written?



Crickets.

Dumb a$$ book banners can't be bothered to actually READ any books. Only ban them.



Beloved had only slightly better writing than the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit edition, but did have more titillation.


LOL, it won a Pulitzer and was a National Book Award finalist, but I’m sure you know better.


The narrative style in Beloved is straight out of 80's cheesefest "Highlander" jumping around in time and space so much and blending multiple viewpoints that the reader might as well be riding in the TARDIS.

Beloved depicts rape and violence towards women, described in such detail, so often, as to cause a reader to wonder if Toni was really condemning it, or if this "feminist" had some sort of bizarre masochistic fetish? Feminist fiction has often left me wondering that. Honestly, Toni Morrison's novels seem more like an attempt to shock, stupefy, and play mind games with her readers than to actually tell stories.


Sure. And slavery was actually a good things for slaves. They were never raped or beaten or brutalized.


What does that have to do with the quality of Toni Morrison's writing?

Toni attempts to manipulate the reader in an obvious manner with zero subtly whatsoever. She may as well write on the cover " I am trying to make you feel dumber than I am! " Unfortunately for Toni, if a reader knows you're trying to manipulate them, no amount of style, imagery, or endorsements from critics is going to work. There is a saying-"A tactic known is a tactic blown".

Try reading her other works and you can see the same tricks at play right away.


I struggle to make sense of Beloved, but it's worth the exercise. And I thing I suspect is that there's no group of parents less qualified to weigh in on the merits of Toni Morrison's style than Langley parents. They may know a few things about stock options and carried interest, but they aren't exactly a literary crowd.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t just the principal. The Region 1 superintendent (Doug Tyson) issued a separate apology as well. It’s just sad they feel the need to apologize for looking for creative ways to encourage kids to read.


There are many, many other ways to better encourage folks to read than this. C'mon - be better.


Agreed. There are healthy ways to encourage kids to read without putting them against their parents.


+2
And MUCH better written books to encourage kids to read.


Much better written than what? Which books in the Langley display do you believe were poorly written?



Crickets.

Dumb a$$ book banners can't be bothered to actually READ any books. Only ban them.



Beloved had only slightly better writing than the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit edition, but did have more titillation.


LOL, it won a Pulitzer and was a National Book Award finalist, but I’m sure you know better.


The narrative style in Beloved is straight out of 80's cheesefest "Highlander" jumping around in time and space so much and blending multiple viewpoints that the reader might as well be riding in the TARDIS.

Beloved depicts rape and violence towards women, described in such detail, so often, as to cause a reader to wonder if Toni was really condemning it, or if this "feminist" had some sort of bizarre masochistic fetish? Feminist fiction has often left me wondering that. Honestly, Toni Morrison's novels seem more like an attempt to shock, stupefy, and play mind games with her readers than to actually tell stories.


Sure. And slavery was actually a good things for slaves. They were never raped or beaten or brutalized.


What does that have to do with the quality of Toni Morrison's writing?

Toni attempts to manipulate the reader in an obvious manner with zero subtly whatsoever. She may as well write on the cover " I am trying to make you feel dumber than I am! " Unfortunately for Toni, if a reader knows you're trying to manipulate them, no amount of style, imagery, or endorsements from critics is going to work. There is a saying-"A tactic known is a tactic blown".

Try reading her other works and you can see the same tricks at play right away.


It sounds like it makes you very uncomfortable to contemplate the realities of slavery.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The laughable thing here is that parents who are secure in their own values don’t fear their children being exposed to books. They are not afraid to talk to their children about new ideas, and are not afraid of having in their values challenged. The parents who want to prevent their kids from reading these books are the ones who know, deep down, that their own values are wrong.

Let’s get real. The people opposed to Gender Queer aren’t worried their kids will be traumatized by a drawing, they’re afraid their kids will catch the LGBTQ.


But doesn't it also go both ways? I don't support the R or the L banning as a matter of principle. It's the whole first amendment - you have to allow speech you don't like to protect the speech you do like - because we don't want what is able to be said to depend on who happens to be the arbiter because it could be an arbiter we don't like.

But anyway - I don't get my panties in a twist if books are banned either - because it's not going to affect my kids - and it does happen on both the right and the left. They can still read whatever the hell they want, and I also teach them critical thinking and to have a healthy distrust of authority

The people who are really against censorship should be coming out against the censorship on the left too - and there have been plenty of articles linked about that here.


I didn’t advocate for any censorship. Your post is nothing but whataboutism designed distract from the weaknesses in your own position.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t just the principal. The Region 1 superintendent (Doug Tyson) issued a separate apology as well. It’s just sad they feel the need to apologize for looking for creative ways to encourage kids to read.


There are many, many other ways to better encourage folks to read than this. C'mon - be better.


Agreed. There are healthy ways to encourage kids to read without putting them against their parents.


+2
And MUCH better written books to encourage kids to read.


Much better written than what? Which books in the Langley display do you believe were poorly written?



Crickets.

Dumb a$$ book banners can't be bothered to actually READ any books. Only ban them.



Beloved had only slightly better writing than the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit edition, but did have more titillation.


LOL, it won a Pulitzer and was a National Book Award finalist, but I’m sure you know better.


The narrative style in Beloved is straight out of 80's cheesefest "Highlander" jumping around in time and space so much and blending multiple viewpoints that the reader might as well be riding in the TARDIS.

Beloved depicts rape and violence towards women, described in such detail, so often, as to cause a reader to wonder if Toni was really condemning it, or if this "feminist" had some sort of bizarre masochistic fetish? Feminist fiction has often left me wondering that. Honestly, Toni Morrison's novels seem more like an attempt to shock, stupefy, and play mind games with her readers than to actually tell stories.


Sure. And slavery was actually a good things for slaves. They were never raped or beaten or brutalized.


What does that have to do with the quality of Toni Morrison's writing?

Toni attempts to manipulate the reader in an obvious manner with zero subtly whatsoever. She may as well write on the cover " I am trying to make you feel dumber than I am! " Unfortunately for Toni, if a reader knows you're trying to manipulate them, no amount of style, imagery, or endorsements from critics is going to work. There is a saying-"A tactic known is a tactic blown".

Try reading her other works and you can see the same tricks at play right away.


I struggle to make sense of Beloved, but it's worth the exercise. And I thing I suspect is that there's no group of parents less qualified to weigh in on the merits of Toni Morrison's style than Langley parents. They may know a few things about stock options and carried interest, but they aren't exactly a literary crowd.


I'm of the opinion that if you want a better story to explore a story from multiple viewpoints at a high school level, you're better off reading Rashomon.

The truth is that the stream of racial consciousness interlude in Beloved is a display piece, a verbal stunt that is connected to the rest of the novel by the thinnest of fictions. As well as by Morrison's ambition to leave a monument to the suffering caused by black slavery.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t just the principal. The Region 1 superintendent (Doug Tyson) issued a separate apology as well. It’s just sad they feel the need to apologize for looking for creative ways to encourage kids to read.


There are many, many other ways to better encourage folks to read than this. C'mon - be better.


Agreed. There are healthy ways to encourage kids to read without putting them against their parents.


+2
And MUCH better written books to encourage kids to read.


Much better written than what? Which books in the Langley display do you believe were poorly written?



Crickets.

Dumb a$$ book banners can't be bothered to actually READ any books. Only ban them.



Beloved had only slightly better writing than the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit edition, but did have more titillation.


LOL, it won a Pulitzer and was a National Book Award finalist, but I’m sure you know better.


The narrative style in Beloved is straight out of 80's cheesefest "Highlander" jumping around in time and space so much and blending multiple viewpoints that the reader might as well be riding in the TARDIS.

Beloved depicts rape and violence towards women, described in such detail, so often, as to cause a reader to wonder if Toni was really condemning it, or if this "feminist" had some sort of bizarre masochistic fetish? Feminist fiction has often left me wondering that. Honestly, Toni Morrison's novels seem more like an attempt to shock, stupefy, and play mind games with her readers than to actually tell stories.


Sure. And slavery was actually a good things for slaves. They were never raped or beaten or brutalized.


What does that have to do with the quality of Toni Morrison's writing?

Toni attempts to manipulate the reader in an obvious manner with zero subtly whatsoever. She may as well write on the cover " I am trying to make you feel dumber than I am! " Unfortunately for Toni, if a reader knows you're trying to manipulate them, no amount of style, imagery, or endorsements from critics is going to work. There is a saying-"A tactic known is a tactic blown".

Try reading her other works and you can see the same tricks at play right away.


It sounds like it makes you very uncomfortable to contemplate the realities of slavery.


Not at all. Her odd spacing and lack of punctuation, the fragmented phrases, are little more than an attempt to defamiliarize what are, to be honest, scenes and images that have been familiar since the first photographs of Hitler’s death camps were published in the United States. The dead, heaped in a pile, are nothing new. Only her typography is new.

She is definitely one of the least impressive of the American Nobel laureates. Setting her side by side with Lewis or O'Neill or Faulkner or Steinbeck or Hemingway demonstrates that very quickly. Beyond her novels, I read also two books of her essays (for a total of nine books) and have yet to be impressed by much of anything. Comparing her with some of her fellow black American authors also is instructive. Hurston, Walker, and Baldwin definitely outshine her. In my opinion, the 12 pages of Baldwin's "My Dungeon Shook" are better than anything in the thousands of pages of Morrison. And Baldwin does it repeatedly. (He is the one who should be a Nobel laureate.)

Frankly, I don't think people will be reading much from her in a generation. They will, however, still be reading Baldwin, Faulkner, Hurston, Hemingway, Walker, and Steinbeck.
Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Go to: