Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

No this guy looks much thinner overall, esp the legs. Stop comparing to other people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs
Sept. 11, 2025, 2:42 p.m. ETJust now

Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs
It is unclear why officials delayed a news conference that was scheduled to begin right about now, but a spokesman for the Utah Department of Public Safety just told me that no one is currently in custody

Because they don’t have anyone and have no idea who this is. Releasing the photo to the public means they’re desperate.

[Anonymous]

Maybe we need to unplug the Internet for two weeks and see what happens.

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele]Has anyone noticed physical similarities between the Kirk shooter and the DNC pipe bomber?
[/quote]

[img]
[/img][/quote]
I thought this picture was a trans man??? This looks like your average white cis-man[/quote]

Trans women, when they wear men’s clothing and cut their hair short tend to look just like cis men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs
Sept. 11, 2025, 2:42 p.m. ETJust now

Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs
It is unclear why officials delayed a news conference that was scheduled to begin right about now, but a spokesman for the Utah Department of Public Safety just told me that no one is currently in custody

Because they don’t have anyone and have no idea who this is. Releasing the photo to the public means they’re desperate.

But why not release the video too?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Authorities said they recovered a high-powered, bolt-action rifle in a nearby wooded area. Ammunition inside the rifle was engraved with messages of transgender and antifascist ideology, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing a law enforcement bulletin and a source familiar with the investigation. The FBI declined to comment to The Independent.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/charlie-kirk-shot-suspect-utah-manhunt-b2824720.html

How convenient for them to be gifted a weapon and motive all at once.

why does this admin think everyone is as uneducated as MAGA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t make sense. Nor does all the brainpower and effort to pull this off only to leave behind engraved casings like an immature troll.

Not to mention that he probably didn't have time to break it back down and put it in his backpack--so he jumped from a roof with a big rifle?

(or has it been 100% confirmed that the rifle was found off-site?)

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele]Has anyone noticed physical similarities between the Kirk shooter and the DNC pipe bomber?
[/quote]

[img]
[/img][/quote]
I thought this picture was a trans man??? This looks like your average white cis-man[/quote]

Trans women, when they wear men’s clothing and cut their hair short tend to look just like cis men.[/quote]

Nope. Not just the same. They have hips. This guy has no hips.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Has anyone noticed physical similarities between the Kirk shooter and the DNC pipe bomber?

I don’t see any similarities looking at the pictures but that would be an interesting twist. I did wonder if the shooter was an anarchist who was going to target a Dem next to create more chaos - was surprised how fast the left assumed the shooter was “on their side.”

I haven’t heard anyone on the left say he’s “on their side”. I’ve only heard “we know nothing so far”, which is true .

Yeah I didn’t use the best phrasing - I meant Dems assumed Charlie Kirk was killed for his conservative views (and the next logical step is the shooter disagreed with those views and the logical step after that is those who don’t share those views are safe from the shooter).

Which Dems? Specifically? Randos on Twitter? Anonymous posters on DCUM?

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele]Has anyone noticed physical similarities between the Kirk shooter and the DNC pipe bomber?
[/quote]

[img]
[/img][/quote]
I thought this picture was a trans man??? This looks like your average white cis-man[/quote]

Trans women, when they wear men’s clothing and cut their hair short tend to look just like cis men.[/quote]

Nope. Not just the same. They have hips. This guy has no hips.[/quote]

I think you are confusing what a trans woman is with a trans man.

Trans woman = biological male
Trans man = biological female

So a trans man may have hips but a trans woman would typically not have hips.

[Anonymous]

It’s a little hard to tell with the clothing, but the Utah shooter looks taller and thinner.

[Anonymous]

The roof is not too far above a walkway. Only a railing (either level or not much height difference to this walkway).

[Anonymous]

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele]Has anyone noticed physical similarities between the Kirk shooter and the DNC pipe bomber?
[/quote]

[img]
[/img][/quote]
I thought this picture was a trans man??? This looks like your average white cis-man[/quote]

Trans women, when they wear men’s clothing and cut their hair short tend to look just like cis men.[/quote]

Nope. Not just the same. They have hips. This guy has no hips.[/quote]

All trans women have hips? Wtf?

There are tons of trans women who don’t have hips.

[Anonymous]

The alleged Kirk shooter looks like a larger, leaner frame than the pipe bomber. Pipe bomber looks shorter and stockier, although it's hard to tell with all the layered clothing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A theory

Kirk talked about Netanyahu having advance knowledge of 10/7, talked about a potential "ethnic cleansing" on PBD, and the final straw was that he talked about Epstein-Mossad blackmail and 100% believed in that theory.

Kirk was still firmly Zionist (still criticizing the Israeli government), but he was a very loose end and was starting to become a liability. Think of the political fallout of the biggest conservative voice identifying as "ex-Zionist" - I think that would be enough to singlehandedly counteract AIPAC's work, if not strongly weaken it. There are also some righties flipping on Israel (ex: Owens) but none of them are near Kirk's peak global influence.

So it's a quin-whammy:

* Epstein distraction
* create zionist martyr
* balkanize left/right further
* Typical Mossad "cleanup" op
* Qatar bombing distraction

All of these boxes intersected at the right time and place - talking to college students about gun violence shortly before heartlessly being gunned down by the people he sold his soul to.

Isreal isn't the only entity killing people. Okay?