She’s conveying anger and annoyance. I don’t think she needs to be likable for the judge. |
+1 For the purposes of this case, she is doing great. |
I’m listening and I disagree. |
Me again, she seems to really be trying to put all the information out there. |
|
Her explantion for having cash, in context of the African-American experience, makes perfect sense.
And the idea that she or Mr. Wade benefited in some what because of their relationship as it pertains to the trump case, is a crock. This should all be put to bed. |
Yet, she paid the person rent using a Cash App, per her testimony. Interesting that her claim of reimbursing her lover is not traceable. |
“Interesting” doesn’t mean it outweighs what she says. |
She is answering all the questions, though. Thoroughly. |