Kyle Rittenhouse: Vigilante White Men

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Count 6- possession of weapon by a person under 18- was just dismissed.

Like, that was the most obvious of the counts. He is under 18. He possessed a weapon and even used it on people. There is video and everything. What a crock.

And don’t forget he cross state lines. The onion did an article recently titled Judge Rittenhouse Judge plans to adopt Kyle at the end of the trial or something similar. This is a travesty.

Have you watched any of the trial? He did not cross state lines with any weapon.

No, he affected an illegal straw purchase. Just as bad, if not worse. Unless you are biased about the law.

No, he borrowed a friends rifle, which is 100% legal. You can’t convict on feelings

He paid the friend to buy a gun for him and hold it in Wisconsin until he was 18, because he knew he could not buy it legally in Wisconsin or Illinois.

Did you watch his testimony?

Why do we bother to have gun laws if they aren't going to be enforced?

That’s not an illegal straw purchase

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge dismissed the curfew violation charge.

Curfew was at 8:00PM.

The videos are fro 11:30+ PM.

Anyone else charged with violating it? He wasnt the only one there

But the smirking brat killed two people.

So convict him on the curfew charge. And go through all the footage of that night and convict all rioters on same. I’m good with that

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What are the odds that three men, a couple with serious criminal histories, were there that night to ‘be good people’? JFC

The odds are 100%. Because they were all unarmed.

There is LITERALLY a photograph of one of the men with a pistol. Another had a skateboard and was using it as a weapon.

Having a skateboard (or a baseball bat or a cast iron skillet or whatever) is not being armed. Literally.

When you are using it as weapon, it sure is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What are the odds that three men, a couple with serious criminal histories, were there that night to ‘be good people’? JFC

The odds are 100%. Because they were all unarmed.

There is LITERALLY a photograph of one of the men with a pistol. Another had a skateboard and was using it as a weapon.

Having a skateboard (or a baseball bat or a cast iron skillet or whatever) is not being armed. Literally.

Years ago, when I was an intern at the USAO in DC, I remember there being a charge of "AWIK (shod foot)" --- Assault with Intent to Kill by a foot with a shoe.

So, while a skateboard, or skillet is not "armour" -- a skateboard or skillet could be a lethal weapon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge dismissed the curfew violation charge.

Curfew was at 8:00PM.

The videos are fro 11:30+ PM.

Anyone else charged with violating it? He wasnt the only one there

But the smirking brat killed two people.

So convict him on the curfew charge. And go through all the footage of that night and convict all rioters on same. I’m good with that

When someone crashes their car while speeding, they get a speeding ticket. That's not unfair, even if all the other speeding cars did not get tickets. Right? Or do you disagree with that, too?

[Anonymous]

I know this is not the substance of the matter -- but I am NOT a fan of the prosecutor's little "swirl" in his hair. That is not very professional or even "current" for hair styles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What are the odds that three men, a couple with serious criminal histories, were there that night to ‘be good people’? JFC

The odds are 100%. Because they were all unarmed.

There is LITERALLY a photograph of one of the men with a pistol. Another had a skateboard and was using it as a weapon.

Having a skateboard (or a baseball bat or a cast iron skillet or whatever) is not being armed. Literally.

Years ago, when I was an intern at the USAO in DC, I remember there being a charge of "AWIK (shod foot)" --- Assault with Intent to Kill by a foot with a shoe.

So, while a skateboard, or skillet is not "armour" -- a skateboard or skillet could be a lethal weapon.

A skateboard can be a lethal weapon but Skateboard Guy wasn't armed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge dismissed the curfew violation charge.

Curfew was at 8:00PM.

The videos are fro 11:30+ PM.

Anyone else charged with violating it? He wasnt the only one there

But the smirking brat killed two people.

So convict him on the curfew charge. And go through all the footage of that night and convict all rioters on same. I’m good with that

When someone crashes their car while speeding, they get a speeding ticket. That's not unfair, even if all the other speeding cars did not get tickets. Right? Or do you disagree with that, too?

There as plenty of destruction, looting, burning during the riots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What are the odds that three men, a couple with serious criminal histories, were there that night to ‘be good people’? JFC

The odds are 100%. Because they were all unarmed.

There is LITERALLY a photograph of one of the men with a pistol. Another had a skateboard and was using it as a weapon.

Having a skateboard (or a baseball bat or a cast iron skillet or whatever) is not being armed. Literally.

Years ago, when I was an intern at the USAO in DC, I remember there being a charge of "AWIK (shod foot)" --- Assault with Intent to Kill by a foot with a shoe.

So, while a skateboard, or skillet is not "armour" -- a skateboard or skillet could be a lethal weapon.

A skateboard can be a lethal weapon but Skateboard Guy wasn't armed.

Um, isn’t there a photo of him ready to use it to bash Rittenhouse?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge dismissed the curfew violation charge.

Curfew was at 8:00PM.

The videos are fro 11:30+ PM.

Anyone else charged with violating it? He wasnt the only one there

But the smirking brat killed two people.

So convict him on the curfew charge. And go through all the footage of that night and convict all rioters on same. I’m good with that

When someone crashes their car while speeding, they get a speeding ticket. That's not unfair, even if all the other speeding cars did not get tickets. Right? Or do you disagree with that, too?

There as plenty of destruction, looting, burning during the riots.

Then Rittenhouse should have stuck to looting and burning during the riots instead of shooting people. Good point.

[Anonymous]

So can we pressure the federal prosecutor to bring charges against this smug a$$h01e for violating his victims’ civil rights? Even if the cases are weak at least it would tie him up in court for much longer, preventing him from moving on with his life with zero consequences. Let’s just bankrupt his a$$ and keep this hanging over his head for life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So can we pressure the federal prosecutor to bring charges against this smug a$$h01e for violating his victims’ civil rights? Even if the cases are weak at least it would tie him up in court for much longer, preventing him from moving on with his life with zero consequences. Let’s just bankrupt his a$$ and keep this hanging over his head for life.

Same republicans judge will make sure he goes free.

[Anonymous]

The judge's reading of instructions will almost guarantee federal action on this case.

[Anonymous]

asking if someone knows -- if this jury hangs, and a mistrial is declared, then jeopardy hasn't attached and he can be re-tried, right? Could he just be re-tried federally to get out of this court?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:After he is acquitted, he should walk out of the court, sling his AR on his shoulder, do some interviews and then get ready to make a ton of money suing the left wing news agencies for slander.

Hopefully karma and street justice will see that that never happens