The Cambridges News and Updates ( Prince William, Kate Middleton, George, Charlotte and Louis)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just came back to show that Dan Wotton also agrees with me that Kate is copying Meghan…later ya stans!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10046315/DAN-WOOTTON-Kate-thank-Meghan-metamorphosis.html

Wow. I like Kate and am delighted to see her becoming more confident and glamorous, but that article is embarrassingly pathetic and desperate-sounding. Yikes. With friends like those....

It sounds like the Cambridge version of Omid Scobie.

It achieved what it was meant to, a rallying support by the public around the duchess

Which one?

That article made Kate look slimy and frumpy. She couldn’t figure out how to dress herself until her sister in law showed up? Really?! That’s what her supposed supporters are saying. Then she copied her sister in law’s style? (Or tried to) Then she’s gleefully delighted that she might look more put together than her SIL 3 months postpartum on a work trip???

This article makes Kate look like she’s really struggling and can’t copy Meghan fast enough. I would be embarrassed if I was in her shoes.

When Kate starts wearing oversized coats to hide her lumps and rolls, and ill fitting clothes lacking tailoring then she will be copying Meghan, until then, not so much. You're reading what you want to read given your bias. And you could never afford Kate's shoes, so nobody cares if you would be "embarrassed" in your stupid fantasy.

Kate sequestered herself for months and months after her pregnancies, so, no lumps or bumps. That’s one way to avoid the criticisms of the superficial masses. Having the support of the press is another.

You mean when she appeared on the steps of the hospital with each of her newborns?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just came back to show that Dan Wotton also agrees with me that Kate is copying Meghan…later ya stans!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10046315/DAN-WOOTTON-Kate-thank-Meghan-metamorphosis.html

Wow. I like Kate and am delighted to see her becoming more confident and glamorous, but that article is embarrassingly pathetic and desperate-sounding. Yikes. With friends like those....

It sounds like the Cambridge version of Omid Scobie.

It achieved what it was meant to, a rallying support by the public around the duchess

Which one?

That article made Kate look slimy and frumpy. She couldn’t figure out how to dress herself until her sister in law showed up? Really?! That’s what her supposed supporters are saying. Then she copied her sister in law’s style? (Or tried to) Then she’s gleefully delighted that she might look more put together than her SIL 3 months postpartum on a work trip???

This article makes Kate look like she’s really struggling and can’t copy Meghan fast enough. I would be embarrassed if I was in her shoes.

When Kate starts wearing oversized coats to hide her lumps and rolls, and ill fitting clothes lacking tailoring then she will be copying Meghan, until then, not so much. You're reading what you want to read given your bias. And you could never afford Kate's shoes, so nobody cares if you would be "embarrassed" in your stupid fantasy.

Kate sequestered herself for months and months after her pregnancies, so, no lumps or bumps. That’s one way to avoid the criticisms of the superficial masses. Having the support of the press is another.

She was literally on the steps of the hospital days after giving birth. She was at H & M's wedding like 2 weeks after giving birth to Louis. How is that avoiding criticisms of the superficial masses?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just came back to show that Dan Wotton also agrees with me that Kate is copying Meghan…later ya stans!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10046315/DAN-WOOTTON-Kate-thank-Meghan-metamorphosis.html

Wow. I like Kate and am delighted to see her becoming more confident and glamorous, but that article is embarrassingly pathetic and desperate-sounding. Yikes. With friends like those....

It sounds like the Cambridge version of Omid Scobie.

It achieved what it was meant to, a rallying support by the public around the duchess

Which one?

That article made Kate look slimy and frumpy. She couldn’t figure out how to dress herself until her sister in law showed up? Really?! That’s what her supposed supporters are saying. Then she copied her sister in law’s style? (Or tried to) Then she’s gleefully delighted that she might look more put together than her SIL 3 months postpartum on a work trip???

This article makes Kate look like she’s really struggling and can’t copy Meghan fast enough. I would be embarrassed if I was in her shoes.

When Kate starts wearing oversized coats to hide her lumps and rolls, and ill fitting clothes lacking tailoring then she will be copying Meghan, until then, not so much. You're reading what you want to read given your bias. And you could never afford Kate's shoes, so nobody cares if you would be "embarrassed" in your stupid fantasy.

Kate sequestered herself for months and months after her pregnancies, so, no lumps or bumps. That’s one way to avoid the criticisms of the superficial masses. Having the support of the press is another.

She was literally on the steps of the hospital days after giving birth. She was at H & M's wedding like 2 weeks after giving birth to Louis. How is that avoiding criticisms of the superficial masses?

+ 2. Come ON, PP.

I wouldn’t have expected Meghan to look like the flushed and chunky mess she was in NYC because she radiates brittle control freak vibes. But she was. Get over it.

[Anonymous]

On the steps of the hospital, Middleton wore the polka dot blue dress WITH a belt to highlight a woman’s post partum belly. And yes I remember because so many people were ignorant on the subject and kept joking that she must not have given birth yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just came back to show that Dan Wotton also agrees with me that Kate is copying Meghan…later ya stans!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10046315/DAN-WOOTTON-Kate-thank-Meghan-metamorphosis.html

Wow. I like Kate and am delighted to see her becoming more confident and glamorous, but that article is embarrassingly pathetic and desperate-sounding. Yikes. With friends like those....

It sounds like the Cambridge version of Omid Scobie.

It achieved what it was meant to, a rallying support by the public around the duchess

Which one?

That article made Kate look slimy and frumpy. She couldn’t figure out how to dress herself until her sister in law showed up? Really?! That’s what her supposed supporters are saying. Then she copied her sister in law’s style? (Or tried to) Then she’s gleefully delighted that she might look more put together than her SIL 3 months postpartum on a work trip???

This article makes Kate look like she’s really struggling and can’t copy Meghan fast enough. I would be embarrassed if I was in her shoes.

When Kate starts wearing oversized coats to hide her lumps and rolls, and ill fitting clothes lacking tailoring then she will be copying Meghan, until then, not so much. You're reading what you want to read given your bias. And you could never afford Kate's shoes, so nobody cares if you would be "embarrassed" in your stupid fantasy.

Kate sequestered herself for months and months after her pregnancies, so, no lumps or bumps. That’s one way to avoid the criticisms of the superficial masses. Having the support of the press is another.

You mean when she appeared on the steps of the hospital with each of her newborns?

Nope. I mean immediately after that. And good for her. It’s her choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just came back to show that Dan Wotton also agrees with me that Kate is copying Meghan…later ya stans!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10046315/DAN-WOOTTON-Kate-thank-Meghan-metamorphosis.html

Wow. I like Kate and am delighted to see her becoming more confident and glamorous, but that article is embarrassingly pathetic and desperate-sounding. Yikes. With friends like those....

It sounds like the Cambridge version of Omid Scobie.

It achieved what it was meant to, a rallying support by the public around the duchess

Which one?

That article made Kate look slimy and frumpy. She couldn’t figure out how to dress herself until her sister in law showed up? Really?! That’s what her supposed supporters are saying. Then she copied her sister in law’s style? (Or tried to) Then she’s gleefully delighted that she might look more put together than her SIL 3 months postpartum on a work trip???

This article makes Kate look like she’s really struggling and can’t copy Meghan fast enough. I would be embarrassed if I was in her shoes.

When Kate starts wearing oversized coats to hide her lumps and rolls, and ill fitting clothes lacking tailoring then she will be copying Meghan, until then, not so much. You're reading what you want to read given your bias. And you could never afford Kate's shoes, so nobody cares if you would be "embarrassed" in your stupid fantasy.

Kate sequestered herself for months and months after her pregnancies, so, no lumps or bumps. That’s one way to avoid the criticisms of the superficial masses. Having the support of the press is another.

You mean when she appeared on the steps of the hospital with each of her newborns?

Nope. I mean immediately after that. And good for her. It’s her choice.

To add: I just find it odd that, on a site focused on “moms”, people are slagging the appearance of a woman who recently had a child. Meghan had the audacity to go out in public— exposing herself to virulent criticism for her appearance. Kate made different choices. Both are valid. Neither is embarrassing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just came back to show that Dan Wotton also agrees with me that Kate is copying Meghan…later ya stans!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10046315/DAN-WOOTTON-Kate-thank-Meghan-metamorphosis.html

Wow. I like Kate and am delighted to see her becoming more confident and glamorous, but that article is embarrassingly pathetic and desperate-sounding. Yikes. With friends like those....

It sounds like the Cambridge version of Omid Scobie.

It achieved what it was meant to, a rallying support by the public around the duchess

Which one?

That article made Kate look slimy and frumpy. She couldn’t figure out how to dress herself until her sister in law showed up? Really?! That’s what her supposed supporters are saying. Then she copied her sister in law’s style? (Or tried to) Then she’s gleefully delighted that she might look more put together than her SIL 3 months postpartum on a work trip???

This article makes Kate look like she’s really struggling and can’t copy Meghan fast enough. I would be embarrassed if I was in her shoes.

When Kate starts wearing oversized coats to hide her lumps and rolls, and ill fitting clothes lacking tailoring then she will be copying Meghan, until then, not so much. You're reading what you want to read given your bias. And you could never afford Kate's shoes, so nobody cares if you would be "embarrassed" in your stupid fantasy.

Kate sequestered herself for months and months after her pregnancies, so, no lumps or bumps. That’s one way to avoid the criticisms of the superficial masses. Having the support of the press is another.

You mean when she appeared on the steps of the hospital with each of her newborns?

Nope. I mean immediately after that. And good for her. It’s her choice.

To add: I just find it odd that, on a site focused on “moms”, people are slagging the appearance of a woman who recently had a child. Meghan had the audacity to go out in public— exposing herself to virulent criticism for her appearance. Kate made different choices. Both are valid. Neither is embarrassing.

This is why I feel the hatred against Meghan has less to do with racism and everything to do with misogyny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just came back to show that Dan Wotton also agrees with me that Kate is copying Meghan…later ya stans!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10046315/DAN-WOOTTON-Kate-thank-Meghan-metamorphosis.html

Wow. I like Kate and am delighted to see her becoming more confident and glamorous, but that article is embarrassingly pathetic and desperate-sounding. Yikes. With friends like those....

It sounds like the Cambridge version of Omid Scobie.

It achieved what it was meant to, a rallying support by the public around the duchess

Which one?

That article made Kate look slimy and frumpy. She couldn’t figure out how to dress herself until her sister in law showed up? Really?! That’s what her supposed supporters are saying. Then she copied her sister in law’s style? (Or tried to) Then she’s gleefully delighted that she might look more put together than her SIL 3 months postpartum on a work trip???

This article makes Kate look like she’s really struggling and can’t copy Meghan fast enough. I would be embarrassed if I was in her shoes.

When Kate starts wearing oversized coats to hide her lumps and rolls, and ill fitting clothes lacking tailoring then she will be copying Meghan, until then, not so much. You're reading what you want to read given your bias. And you could never afford Kate's shoes, so nobody cares if you would be "embarrassed" in your stupid fantasy.

Kate sequestered herself for months and months after her pregnancies, so, no lumps or bumps. That’s one way to avoid the criticisms of the superficial masses. Having the support of the press is another.

You mean when she appeared on the steps of the hospital with each of her newborns?

Nope. I mean immediately after that. And good for her. It’s her choice.

To add: I just find it odd that, on a site focused on “moms”, people are slagging the appearance of a woman who recently had a child. Meghan had the audacity to go out in public— exposing herself to virulent criticism for her appearance. Kate made different choices. Both are valid. Neither is embarrassing.

Oh you must have missed the usual criticisms about how old and ugly and skeletal Kate looks. Obviously you are new here and this is the first post you have ever read. Check out the Lena Dunham thread next.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What do you mean by first publicly gay monarch

David Windsor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you mean by first publicly gay monarch

David Windsor

No. I literally meant all this consternation surrounding Meghan will be best reserved for the first monarch, King or Queen, to publicly date, sleep with, and marry a person of their own sex.

Should be interesting when it happens. The Brits will either go completely looney tunes or they'll act like it happens every day and you're nuts to question His/Her Majesty's The Perfect One's presence.

All depends on how much they like the monarch.

[Anonymous]

All this nonsense to distract us from recognizing how little she works

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All this nonsense to distract us from recognizing how little she works

She's raising the heir to the throne.

Diana didn't really even try to do that job. Will knows that firsthand, and he wants Kate to actually be a mother.

The current Queen certainly didn't mother her children...and let's just say that didn't end well.

Kate works enough. As we emerge from the pandemic in a year and her kids are little older, I'm sure we will see more of Kate.

Plus, I'm sure there is a bit of a sensitivity with Will not wanting his more interesting young family to outshine his father--who has preparing his entire life for a job he hasn't actually gotten yet. My sense is Will and Charles are a bit of team: let Dad have his time, do what he's asked, and enjoy his family while he can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just came back to show that Dan Wotton also agrees with me that Kate is copying Meghan…later ya stans!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-10046315/DAN-WOOTTON-Kate-thank-Meghan-metamorphosis.html

Wow. I like Kate and am delighted to see her becoming more confident and glamorous, but that article is embarrassingly pathetic and desperate-sounding. Yikes. With friends like those....

It sounds like the Cambridge version of Omid Scobie.

It achieved what it was meant to, a rallying support by the public around the duchess

Which one?

That article made Kate look slimy and frumpy. She couldn’t figure out how to dress herself until her sister in law showed up? Really?! That’s what her supposed supporters are saying. Then she copied her sister in law’s style? (Or tried to) Then she’s gleefully delighted that she might look more put together than her SIL 3 months postpartum on a work trip???

This article makes Kate look like she’s really struggling and can’t copy Meghan fast enough. I would be embarrassed if I was in her shoes.

When Kate starts wearing oversized coats to hide her lumps and rolls, and ill fitting clothes lacking tailoring then she will be copying Meghan, until then, not so much. You're reading what you want to read given your bias. And you could never afford Kate's shoes, so nobody cares if you would be "embarrassed" in your stupid fantasy.

Kate sequestered herself for months and months after her pregnancies, so, no lumps or bumps. That’s one way to avoid the criticisms of the superficial masses. Having the support of the press is another.

You mean when she appeared on the steps of the hospital with each of her newborns?

Nope. I mean immediately after that. And good for her. It’s her choice.

To add: I just find it odd that, on a site focused on “moms”, people are slagging the appearance of a woman who recently had a child. Meghan had the audacity to go out in public— exposing herself to virulent criticism for her appearance. Kate made different choices. Both are valid. Neither is embarrassing.

Oh you must have missed the usual criticisms about how old and ugly and skeletal Kate looks. Obviously you are new here and this is the first post you have ever read. Check out the Lena Dunham thread next.

+ 1. Incredibly disingenuous posters have arrived here straight from Mercury.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:On the steps of the hospital, Middleton wore the polka dot blue dress WITH a belt to highlight a woman’s post partum belly. And yes I remember because so many people were ignorant on the subject and kept joking that she must not have given birth yet.

A lot of grace is given to a woman who just went through childbirth. Obviously, that's not true 3 months later. She better have lost that weight, and there's something really wrong with her if she hasn't!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All this nonsense to distract us from recognizing how little she works

She's raising the heir to the throne.

Diana didn't really even try to do that job. Will knows that firsthand, and he wants Kate to actually be a mother.

The current Queen certainly didn't mother her children...and let's just say that didn't end well.

Kate works enough. As we emerge from the pandemic in a year and her kids are little older, I'm sure we will see more of Kate.

Plus, I'm sure there is a bit of a sensitivity with Will not wanting his more interesting young family to outshine his father--who has preparing his entire life for a job he hasn't actually gotten yet. My sense is Will and Charles are a bit of team: let Dad have his time, do what he's asked, and enjoy his family while he can.

Sorry but as Everyone knows, she just sits at home eating bonbons