The Kane Show (Part 4)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kane and Natasha both handled the divorce horribly. Kane started it - I don't think that's even debatable - but Natasha has contributed, too. I remember someone commenting on her IG joking about how ugly Kane is and her responding back something to the effect of "thank you, I needed the laugh." Uh, does she not realize her daughters (particularly the youngest) are near carbon copies of Kane? Yet she's lol'ing at him being called ugly? Eek. And her blog post about her fall is more than slightly alluding to calling him out. The whole thing is a disaster.

agreed. I was pleasantly surprised at her last blog post saying she was going to stop talking negatively about him. I hope she follows through because her posts (on IG and her blog) were giving me whiplash... one day he would be Daddy/the girls father and the next she'd be blasting P/Peter for whatever reason. I think she finally realized it was only making her look bad. Yes Kane flipped the f out on air but since then he's been quiet as a mouse and he sure as hell hasn't written a post about her/referencing her. Hopefully they can both keep it positive.

her blog about the fall was totally all true, he never asked her if she needed any medical help, he claimed to be so scared for the girls safety and then left them with her??! and he then turned around and contacted his attorney. Live nearby and was there when it went down...also he alludes to her on the air all the time, just smart enough not to use her name = talked about having a toxic mold on his heart one morning, was that not about Natasha? this guy is a world class liar. there are some of us that know them both and know what he is doing in the background to Natasha and it is horrible. He is an awful mean person. By the way, he posts about Natasha often and then deletes it when he gets called out. Like making it seem a while back that he got custody of the girls it was all crap once he got called out all the posts disappeared...

Suspicion that she was doped up (which she was ) aren't enough to yoink custody of the kids away from her when it's his turn to drop them off, you ding dong.

I would contact my attorney too if my ex was trolling the streets and getting into accidents while hopped up on pills. Just because she's prescribed them does not mean she should've been taking them. Go back a few pages to see Natasha's post defending herself ( ) for a list of the meds... Look out for all the &s, you can't miss it.

Uh, those are some strong allegations you're throwing out. But to clarify one point, "just because she's prescribed them does not mean she should've been taking them"? Actually yes, if she's prescribed them she should be taking them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Uh, those are some strong allegations you're throwing out. But to clarify one point, "just because she's prescribed them does not mean she should've been taking them"? Actually yes, if she's prescribed them she should be taking them.

Well, that depends. If they are prescribed and they have a warning about driving, then she should not have been taking them if she knew she'd have to drive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Uh, those are some strong allegations you're throwing out. But to clarify one point, "just because she's prescribed them does not mean she should've been taking them"? Actually yes, if she's prescribed them she should be taking them.

Well, that depends. If they are prescribed and they have a warning about driving, then she should not have been taking them if she knew she'd have to drive.

Agreed. She should've evaluated how she responds to the pills before driving while using them. And if you look at the side effects of the pills she said she took (elavil, etc) they're pretty intense.

[Anonymous]

Anyone see that picture Natasha just posted on Instagram?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see that picture Natasha just posted on Instagram?

She's annoying me now. Don't post about having an awful 24 hours or whatever if you're not prepared to elaborate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What is with Danni constantly throwing jabs about how she can't wait for karma on others? Seriously, I'm over it! Just because she was fired from a show by saying something that she shouldn't have said dies not mean you wish karma on your past coworkers. Let it go!! She is sounding bitter like Sarah now. And, the constant comments about being black is annoying...we get you're black, move on now. Saying black don't crack...white people don't crack either.

Are you kidding me? You obviously don't get it do you....sigh.

[Anonymous]

Natasha drives me bonkers. I'm diagnosed fibro and I don't take any of that stuff when I know I have to be somewhere. It's not worth the risk. There are plenty of women with fibro/MS/lupus/what have you that choose to suffer the pain as opposed to putting ourselves/others at risk by taking the meds and driving. And if you can't handle the pain or it's too much, you don't drive and find accommodations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone see that picture Natasha just posted on Instagram?

She's annoying me now. Don't post about having an awful 24 hours or whatever if you're not prepared to elaborate.

She's subscribing to the Danni school of vague, mope-y, attention whoring posts.

[Anonymous]

Oh I get that Danni was fired and glad she's gone. Danni thought she could open her big mouth and say what she wanted, clearly she was wrong! Get over it already. She's getting her karma when she talked cap about stm.

[Anonymous]

Natasha probably found out that she has to leave her million dollar home that Kane worked his ass off to get. I'm sure Kane told her no to something and she takes it to heart because she was never told no when they were married.

[Anonymous]

My theory is that it has something to do with custody of the girls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My theory is that it has something to do with custody of the girls.

Anyone think she tried to go for sole custody and lost?

[Anonymous]

Natasha said a "sweet trio of girls sent this to me". Seriously? Danni, Mel, Sarah?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My theory is that it has something to do with custody of the girls.

Anyone think she tried to go for sole custody and lost?

I think that perhaps Peter was able to get some sort of primary custodian arrangement, even if it is only temporary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Natasha said a "sweet trio of girls sent this to me". Seriously? Danni, Mel, Sarah?

That's my guess..to me it's at least hinting that it was them, even if it wasn't really.