$7/gallon gas is coming

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Keystone Pipeline that would carry tar sands crude from Canada for EXPORT to markets outside the US? Brilliant hot take!

DP. Oil is a effectively a worldwide commodity. Supplying more the world would reduce demand pressures and lower prices for everyone.

Alm crude is not the same. And there is excess capacity with Lines 3 and 5, plus rail car. Keystone was critical to making Canadian heavy crude profitable when oil prices were suppressed. Energy policy should be focused on renewables, not subsidizing the petroleum and petrochemical industries.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Keystone Pipeline that would carry tar sands crude from Canada for EXPORT to markets outside the US? Brilliant hot take!

DP. Oil is a effectively a worldwide commodity. Supplying more the world would reduce demand pressures and lower prices for everyone.

Alm crude is not the same. And there is excess capacity with Lines 3 and 5, plus rail car. Keystone was critical to making Canadian heavy crude profitable when oil prices were suppressed. Energy policy should be focused on renewables, not subsidizing the petroleum and petrochemical industries.

Energy policy has been focused on renewables! But despite the fact that many have pointed out that renewables cannot replace fossil fuels without fundamentally altering society, everybody wants to pretend that renewables will replace fossil fuels.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Keystone Pipeline that would carry tar sands crude from Canada for EXPORT to markets outside the US? Brilliant hot take!

DP. Oil is a effectively a worldwide commodity. Supplying more the world would reduce demand pressures and lower prices for everyone.

Alm crude is not the same. And there is excess capacity with Lines 3 and 5, plus rail car. Keystone was critical to making Canadian heavy crude profitable when oil prices were suppressed. Energy policy should be focused on renewables, not subsidizing the petroleum and petrochemical industries.

Energy policy has been focused on renewables! But despite the fact that many have pointed out that renewables cannot replace fossil fuels without fundamentally altering society, everybody wants to pretend that renewables will replace fossil fuels.

Has energy consumption increased or decreased in those last 10 years?

[Anonymous]

So, when we have a real emergency, our SPR will be drained. Lovely.

[Anonymous]

Dems celebrated gas reduction too early..it's going right back to $5.. what a stupid idea to deplete the SPR. OPEC just undermined it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dems celebrated gas reduction too early..it's going right back to $5.. what a stupid idea to deplete the SPR. OPEC just undermined it.

You sound almost gleeful at the prospect of gas prices going up. Anything to own the libs, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems celebrated gas reduction too early..it's going right back to $5.. what a stupid idea to deplete the SPR. OPEC just undermined it.

You sound almost gleeful at the prospect of gas prices going up. Anything to own the libs, right?

No one needs to own the libs these days - y’all do it to yourselves.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Keystone Pipeline that would carry tar sands crude from Canada for EXPORT to markets outside the US? Brilliant hot take!

DP. Oil is a effectively a worldwide commodity. Supplying more the world would reduce demand pressures and lower prices for everyone.

Alm crude is not the same. And there is excess capacity with Lines 3 and 5, plus rail car. Keystone was critical to making Canadian heavy crude profitable when oil prices were suppressed. Energy policy should be focused on renewables, not subsidizing the petroleum and petrochemical industries.

Energy policy has been focused on renewables! But despite the fact that many have pointed out that renewables cannot replace fossil fuels without fundamentally altering society, everybody wants to pretend that renewables will replace fossil fuels.

I don't think those idiots realize that petroleum is in many everyday products. Basically anything with plastic-which is
just about everything, plus ink, asphalt, lubricants, clothing, coametics.... Good f'ing luck on the war on oil.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Keystone Pipeline that would carry tar sands crude from Canada for EXPORT to markets outside the US? Brilliant hot take!

DP. Oil is a effectively a worldwide commodity. Supplying more the world would reduce demand pressures and lower prices for everyone.

It’s just a pipeline. A pipeline does not produce new oil. The supply of oil is exactly the same with or without it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems celebrated gas reduction too early..it's going right back to $5.. what a stupid idea to deplete the SPR. OPEC just undermined it.

You sound almost gleeful at the prospect of gas prices going up. Anything to own the libs, right?

No one needs to own the libs these days - y’all do it to yourselves.

In your sad little mind, maybe. I know it hurts to see all the legislation being passed that couldn't be done in the prior administration, the delight in foreign nations dealing with a grown up again . . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems celebrated gas reduction too early..it's going right back to $5.. what a stupid idea to deplete the SPR. OPEC just undermined it.

You sound almost gleeful at the prospect of gas prices going up. Anything to own the libs, right?

No one needs to own the libs these days - y’all do it to yourselves.

In your sad little mind, maybe. I know it hurts to see all the legislation being passed that couldn't be done in the prior administration, the delight in foreign nations dealing with a grown up again . . .

That comment would be hilarious if it weren't so sad and serious.

This administration easing sanctions on Venezuela in order to have them drill more dirty oil....Yeah, "grown ups."
Not to mention the many other crises happening around the world because our adversaries view Biden as impotent and incompetent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Keystone Pipeline that would carry tar sands crude from Canada for EXPORT to markets outside the US? Brilliant hot take!

DP. Oil is a effectively a worldwide commodity. Supplying more the world would reduce demand pressures and lower prices for everyone.

Alm crude is not the same. And there is excess capacity with Lines 3 and 5, plus rail car. Keystone was critical to making Canadian heavy crude profitable when oil prices were suppressed. Energy policy should be focused on renewables, not subsidizing the petroleum and petrochemical industries.

Energy policy has been focused on renewables! But despite the fact that many have pointed out that renewables cannot replace fossil fuels without fundamentally altering society, everybody wants to pretend that renewables will replace fossil fuels.

I don't think those idiots realize that petroleum is in many everyday products. Basically anything with plastic-which is
just about everything, plus ink, asphalt, lubricants, clothing, coametics.... Good f'ing luck on the war on oil.

Oil is having its own war. There is a finite supply. As such, the sooner the whole world shifts to something else to address the energy demands, the better. That doesn't mean oil use disappears overnight. During the 2020 campaign, Biden said it would be 2050 before the shift is meaningful. The rhetoric now is absurd.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dems celebrated gas reduction too early..it's going right back to $5.. what a stupid idea to deplete the SPR. OPEC just undermined it.

You sound almost gleeful at the prospect of gas prices going up. Anything to own the libs, right?

No one needs to own the libs these days - y’all do it to yourselves.

In your sad little mind, maybe. I know it hurts to see all the legislation being passed that couldn't be done in the prior administration, the delight in foreign nations dealing with a grown up again . . .

That comment would be hilarious if it weren't so sad and serious.

This administration easing sanctions on Venezuela in order to have them drill more dirty oil....Yeah, "grown ups."
Not to mention the many other crises happening around the world because our adversaries view Biden as impotent and incompetent.

Agree. We are easing sanctions on a terrible dictatorship.

[Anonymous]

We are working people and these policies are hurting us.

Let’s produce the oil we need!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:WHERE IS MY $7/GALLON GAS? OP promised!

It did happen in CA a while back.