The Kane Show Discussion Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not believing any arrest reports until I see a link.

Who said he was arrested?

So I guess the person he supposedly assaulted just decided to let it go...?

Quite possible. Maybe it occurred at work, and they agreed not to press charges if he was let go. I mean, it kinda makes sense.

+1. in general this seems more plausible than a lot of other speculation floating around

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not believing any arrest reports until I see a link.

Who said he was arrested?

So you’re forgetting all the growing you did on Sunday that we had to JUST WAIT for his arrest info to pop up on Monday? You were quite proud of yourself then. Must be hard as a troll to remember all your lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not believing any arrest reports until I see a link.

Who said he was arrested?

So you’re forgetting all the growing you did on Sunday that we had to JUST WAIT for his arrest info to pop up on Monday? You were quite proud of yourself then. Must be hard as a troll to remember all your lies.

Such a dumb a$$. It's your who's getting your trolls mixed up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not believing any arrest reports until I see a link.

Who said he was arrested?

So you’re forgetting all the growing you did on Sunday that we had to JUST WAIT for his arrest info to pop up on Monday? You were quite proud of yourself then. Must be hard as a troll to remember all your lies.

Such a dumb a$$. It's your who's getting your trolls mixed up.

Uh oh. Trolly troll is getting feisty because they keep getting called out!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Danni just made a post plugging her book where she references Kane sending dick pics. She also says she’ll speak out so I guess she’s going to finally say what happened?

Danni had a dick pic in her phone. Kane asked her to send it to him. Later on used it to get her fired. It was in her book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not believing any arrest reports until I see a link.

Who said he was arrested?

So I guess the person he supposedly assaulted just decided to let it go...?

Quite possible. Maybe it occurred at work, and they agreed not to press charges if he was let go. I mean, it kinda makes sense.

How can that be when he was working at home for at least the last 3 weeks before he was let go?

[Anonymous]

Where there is smoke there is fire. Spend your time calling iheart to petition them to lift the ndas instead of defending someone who seems to have no defenders among any of his recent cohosts (other than IJ)

That's not how NDAs work you idiot. It's a two way NDA. It protects the employee and the company. Both of whom don't give a rats ass if you petition them until you die. They do not have an obligation of disclosure to you or anyone else outside of the company.

All you are going to get is rumors and 'hints' from anonymous people. No one in the industry is going to talk, no matter how badly they need money or attention.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Where there is smoke there is fire. Spend your time calling iheart to petition them to lift the ndas instead of defending someone who seems to have no defenders among any of his recent cohosts (other than IJ)

That's not how NDAs work you idiot. It's a two way NDA. It protects the employee and the company. Both of whom don't give a rats ass if you petition them until you die. They do not have an obligation of disclosure to you or anyone else outside of the company.

All you are going to get is rumors and 'hints' from anonymous people. No one in the industry is going to talk, no matter how badly they need money or attention.

Which is all made up, they’re just getting their jollies by stirring up people on the Internet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not believing any arrest reports until I see a link.

Who said he was arrested?

So I guess the person he supposedly assaulted just decided to let it go...?

Quite possible. Maybe it occurred at work, and they agreed not to press charges if he was let go. I mean, it kinda makes sense.

How can that be when he was working at home for at least the last 3 weeks before he was let go?

Goodness. You do not know how big corporations make decisions. It takes time, especially for firing top, headlining talent.

They've already discussed cutting employees, staff, and reduced pay. If Kane had disciplinary issues from a month ago (and a history to match) they very easily could just now be catching up with him after a board meeting.

https://investors.iheartmedia.com/news/news-details/2020/iHeartMedia-Inc-Announces-Cost-Savings-Initiatives-in-Response-to-Coronavirus-Pandemic-and-Provides-Business-Update/default.aspx

[Anonymous]

Ok, I'll dish!!!


Kane was fired for assaulting IJ. Apparently he hit IJ in the face and was fired for cause which means he does not get his cash payout.

Call BS all you want. I'm not going back and forth with you. The devil is in the IG details.


Kane will NOT be missed. He had it coming.

[Anonymous]

Looks like Erick also scrubbed his IG

[Anonymous]

Why’d he assault IJ?

At the end of the day, ultimately IJ will lose his job too. There’s no way they’re keeping ‘your morning show’ or whatever it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why’d he assault IJ?

At the end of the day, ultimately IJ will lose his job too. There’s no way they’re keeping ‘your morning show’ or whatever it is.

That wasn't provided to me but that's the real reason.

You heard it here first folks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not believing any arrest reports until I see a link.

Who said he was arrested?

So I guess the person he supposedly assaulted just decided to let it go...?

Quite possible. Maybe it occurred at work, and they agreed not to press charges if he was let go. I mean, it kinda makes sense.

How can that be when he was working at home for at least the last 3 weeks before he was let go?

Goodness. You do not know how big corporations make decisions. It takes time, especially for firing top, headlining talent.

They've already discussed cutting employees, staff, and reduced pay. If Kane had disciplinary issues from a month ago (and a history to match) they very easily could just now be catching up with him after a board meeting.

https://investors.iheartmedia.com/news/news-details/2020/iHeartMedia-Inc-Announces-Cost-Savings-Initiatives-in-Response-to-Coronavirus-Pandemic-and-Provides-Business-Update/default.aspx

In other words, you don't know

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m not believing any arrest reports until I see a link.

Who said he was arrested?

So I guess the person he supposedly assaulted just decided to let it go...?

Quite possible. Maybe it occurred at work, and they agreed not to press charges if he was let go. I mean, it kinda makes sense.

How can that be when he was working at home for at least the last 3 weeks before he was let go?

Well then maybe he kirked out on his superiors. The underlings may deal with him flipping his lid but the company execs are not.