Trump tariffs: ruin U.S. economy until 2040

[Anonymous]

Soon we won't really know what is happening with the economy. Economists are losing faith in the numbers put out by this administration.

Gift Link: https://www.wsj.com/economy/cpi-inflation-data-accuracy-8bd2a8ae?st=nXxav8&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bookmarking this and going to come back in December. All this speculation isn’t worth anything. The shelves were supposed to be empty and the S&P was supposed to be at 3,000 according to the sky is always falling crowd on here. Gas prices and housing prices are down so the only leg of inflation left to tackle is goods / groceries. If the market is “flooded” with Chinese goods that means inflation will come down because of supply / demand and all that’s left is grocery prices. After that the Fed lowers rates and we’re at 6,500 for the S&P at the end of the year. Book it.

There is a current disruption in the supply that we will experience in a month or so, but perhaps with this pause, and the pre-stocking that took place, we may not feel it too much.

But...the damage is done. Our trade with the closest allies is damaged significantly to the extent that there are international boycotts against US products and the reliability as a trading partner is tarnished and the damage to the dollar is significant.

Then why did the stock market react the way it did?

Everyone was predicting bare shelves now or any day now, and you’re saying it’s a month or so away.

The stock reacted to Trump retracting his idiotic trade war with China. The markets were happy that Trump ended his tantrum.

You’re not convincing me.

Me either.

The tax on all imports from China is 60%. Trump said so.

It will devastate our whole economy very very soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Dean is a total moron. She’s completely ignorant of the fact we grow bananas here already:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_production_in_the_United_States

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

OMG - she is so dumb she actually thinks bananas are “built” ???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Dean is a total moron. She’s completely ignorant of the fact we grow bananas here already:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_production_in_the_United_States

Not much. From your article.

"Commercial banana production in the United States is relatively limited in scale and economic impact. While Americans eat 26 pounds (12 kg) of bananas per person per year, the vast majority of the fruit is imported from other countries"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

OMG - she is so dumb she actually thinks bananas are “built” ???

for you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

OMG - she is so dumb she actually thinks bananas are “built” ???

Did you note she is responding to Lutnick who stated there are no tariffs if we build bananas in the US? Thisis probably well beyond your intellect, but she is mocking him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

OMG - she is so dumb she actually thinks bananas are “built” ???

That’s your takeaway here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

OMG - she is so dumb she actually thinks bananas are “built” ???

I think you are dumber. Think about context and the entire exchange. Think.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I did not think it was possible for there to be a blonde dumber than Bondi, but there she is.

[Anonymous]

OMG, you people...SHE IS REPEATING LITNICKS WORDS. Watch the whole exchange.


And for what it is worth, yes, there are banana growers in the US. The total amount the grow feeds the US demand for ONE DAY.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

OMG - she is so dumb she actually thinks bananas are “built” ???

No, Lutnick does. Are you this dumb in real life?