GA Case

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking: Fani Willis is hit with allegations of money laundering, bank fraud and election law violations related to her campaign for the DA office.

During the campaign, some of the donor.'s supposedly gave the maximum amount hundreds of times or even thousands of times according to the election/campaign records that were reviewed and some donors' listed addresses are vacant lots or even other states.

It's called 'smurfing' and Sen. Rubio is demanding FEC open an investigation regarding these allegations.

'Smurfing' is a money-laundering technique that involves the structuring of large amounts of cash into multiple small transactions. This is done in order to conceal the source of the money.

If true, Fani can also face State 'Identity Theft' charges as well for using other people's names and addresses and their identities without their permission.

[Anonymous]

I have to wonder at this point if Fani now wishes she had never pursued charges in this case given that he own "house" seems to be a dumpster fire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Breaking: Fani Willis is hit with allegations of money laundering, bank fraud and election law violations related to her campaign for the DA office.

During the campaign, some of the donor.'s supposedly gave the maximum amount hundreds of times or even thousands of times according to the election/campaign records that were reviewed and some donors' listed addresses are vacant lots or even other states.

It's called 'smurfing' and Sen. Rubio is demanding FEC open an investigation regarding these allegations.

And FEC will slow-walk this so it will take at least a year to conclude that three are violations and a referral to DoJ will take place just in time for the NEXT AG to decide if and when to prosecute Fani for all of the Federal charges.

[Anonymous]

Complaint is filed with the Georgia Ethics Office against Fani for violations of Georgia financial disclosure laws requiring her to file financial disclosure forms each year and she failed to file for 2020 to 2022.

[Anonymous]

Wow, the MAGAs and Trump sure are worried about Willis. This is getting desperate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow, the MAGAs and Trump sure are worried about Willis. This is getting desperate.

Of course they are. Facing actual consequences for their behavior? It's terrifying!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow, the MAGAs and Trump sure are worried about Willis. This is getting desperate.

LOL.

Seems Fani should be worried about Fani.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow, the MAGAs and Trump sure are worried about Willis. This is getting desperate.

Of course they are. Facing actual consequences for their behavior? It's terrifying!

Do you mean Fani Willis and Wade? They're nervous, too.

[Anonymous]

Red herrings by trump and his cronies. He's terrified and he hits back with lies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Red herrings by trump and his cronies. He's terrified and he hits back with lies.

LOL.
We'll wait and see what the witnesses and whistleblowers have to say.
I am thinking this will not end well for Fani and her lover.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Red herrings by trump and his cronies. He's terrified and he hits back with lies.

LOL.
We'll wait and see what the witnesses and whistleblowers have to say.
I am thinking this will not end well for Fani and her lover.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The affidavit attached to the response destroys the whole (already weak) conflict of interest narrative. The relationship started after he was hired, so she didn't "hire her boyfriend" as was alleged. And Willis has paid for travel for him in addition to him buying it for her. McAfee will hold a hearing to confirm the facts and then deny the motion. MAGAs heads will explode.

They have witnesses that will refute this. And, the accusations that they were actually living together.
If this is true, another problem in that she lied on her affidavit.

Okay Charlie Kirk follower. He's an insurrection planner. You have a few screws loose. Almost nothing he says is grounded in reality. Except:

You are hilarious. And, wildly off topic.
I'll file this under "When you don't like the message, shoot the messenger."

Let me help you with how information is conveyed. A given X user posts information from a source and summarizes that information in the post.
And, if you don't believe the post, here it is from a different source:

Fani Willis, in Pursuit of Trump, Is Accused of Lying About a Serious Question — When Her Love Affair With Nathan Wade Began

The confession of the district attorney of Georgia’s Fulton County, Fani Willis, that she has a “personal relationship” with the man she hired to prosecute President Trump, Nathan Wade, could soon give way to an even more fateful inquiry: When did the affair begin?

That question is set to take center stage at an evidentiary hearing at Fulton County on February 15, but Ms. Willis wants that occasion scratched from the calendar, a request she has filed in court. She maintains that since she has acknowledged the affair, on the record, and denied that it predates Mr. Wade’s appointment, further fact-finding is superfluous. Her defendants disagree.

Much could hang on when that amorous alliance first kindled. If Ms. Willis and Mr. Wade were intimate before she appointed him special prosecutor — that is the contention of Mr. Trump and his co-defendants — then their role in the sprawling racketeering case, which alleges a “criminal enterprise” to overturn the results of the 2020 election, could be threatened.

Ms. Willis and Mr. Wade are both on record as asserting that the affair began after he was appointed special prosecutor. Mr. Wade, in an affidavit attached to the district attorney, writes that “in 2022, District Attorney Willis and I developed a personal relationship in addition to our professional association and friendship.” He was appointed the year prior.

The defendant who first moved for Ms. Willis’s disqualification, Michael Roman, contends that the affair predates the charging. In a filing, his lawyer, Ashleigh Merchant, calls Ms. Willis’s proffered timeline “false” and suggests that the relationship stretches as far back as 2019. If Ms. Merchant can prove her allegation, Ms. Willis and Mr. Wade will have to worry about not only a conflict of interest, but also possible perjury.

https://www.nysun.com/article/fani-willis-is-accused-of-lying-about-a-serious-question-when-her-love-affair-with-nathan-wade-began

Fani facing:

Criminal-

1) Federal misuse of covid funds;
2) Federal 'honest services fraud' (vendor kickback);
2) State RICO charges;
3) Misuse of State and/or County covid funds w/o requisite approvals;
4) State perjury charges for lying on affidavits;
5) Federal bank fraud charges;
6) Federal money laundering charges;
7) Federal campaign finance violations;
8) State campaign finance violations;

Administrative/disciplinary-

1) US House investigation of misuse of federal funds;
2) GA Senate investigation of misuse of State funds and/or misconduct by DA;
3) GA House Impeachment inquiry;
4) Complaint for violation of Rules of Professional Conduct of GA attorneys at GA Bar;
5) Fulton County investigation on misuse of County funds;

Added additional charges in bold.

Fani's subpoena for sworn deposition in Wade's divorce matter is on 'hold' for now so she may have to be deposed in the near future.

[Anonymous]

House Judiciary Committee issues subpoena for Fani to testify before the Committee.

[Anonymous]

Multiple 'whistle blowers' from Fani's office willing to testify that Fani misused federal covid funds, federal non-covid funds, State funds and other corruption in the DA's office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Breaking: Fani Willis is hit with allegations of money laundering, bank fraud and election law violations related to her campaign for the DA office.

During the campaign, some of the donor.'s supposedly gave the maximum amount hundreds of times or even thousands of times according to the election/campaign records that were reviewed and some donors' listed addresses are vacant lots or even other states.

Link?