Why is Kayleigh McEnany so angry?

[Anonymous]

I personally don't care about her education, her looks, or her parenting practices. I just care that she's a lier. Spin is one thing--lying is another. She's in a job where her word is everything and her constant lies--which can be researched and refuted--are not helping her reputation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She’s raging inside and hates herself because she has to go on the news and state that Trump will attend his own inauguration. She knows he’s delusional and and she looks delusional too.

Link?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how pretty, smart, women aren’t allowed to be angry - unless they’re liberal women, of course. Then they can be total b*tches and don’t you dare mention it or you’re a “misogynist” using the “angry woman” trope.

Then again, I’m hard pressed to think of any pretty, smart liberal women. Maybe that’s why they’re angry?

Nah. You're just showing your biases here by the old "angry liberal women" trope. Bitches. Monkeys. Shrill. Shrew. We've heard it all for years and, frankly, it shows only what empty shells you all are. Attacking the looks of "liberal women" just seals the deal as to what kind of POS you are.

Kayleigh has everything going for her in life: white, blond, pretty, willing to be subservient to a bunch of men who recognize her for the useful idiot she is. Even though she is not particularly smart, articulate, or clever, I suspect that she will land quite nicely at someplace like Trump's new media enterprise, Breitbart, or some RWNJ "nonprofit." Given all of this, it is quite perplexing why she is such an angry, bitter lady. She has so much and got it through doing so little. So she lost one election? I'm sure there are other RWNJ candidate coat tails to ride. Buck up Kayleigh, it's gonna be ok.

If ever there was an “angry liberal women” trope, you certainly epitomize it. Wow.

I consider “empty shells” to be the deeply insecure posters who have wasted pages of this thread bitterly insulting a smart young woman. It’s really pathetic.

LOL


We're just having some fun. You're the one who's apoplectic. Or is that you Kayleigh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how pretty, smart, women aren’t allowed to be angry - unless they’re liberal women, of course. Then they can be total b*tches and don’t you dare mention it or you’re a “misogynist” using the “angry woman” trope.

Then again, I’m hard pressed to think of any pretty, smart liberal women. Maybe that’s why they’re angry?

Nah. You're just showing your biases here by the old "angry liberal women" trope. Bitches. Monkeys. Shrill. Shrew. We've heard it all for years and, frankly, it shows only what empty shells you all are. Attacking the looks of "liberal women" just seals the deal as to what kind of POS you are.

Kayleigh has everything going for her in life: white, blond, pretty, willing to be subservient to a bunch of men who recognize her for the useful idiot she is. Even though she is not particularly smart, articulate, or clever, I suspect that she will land quite nicely at someplace like Trump's new media enterprise, Breitbart, or some RWNJ "nonprofit." Given all of this, it is quite perplexing why she is such an angry, bitter lady. She has so much and got it through doing so little. So she lost one election? I'm sure there are other RWNJ candidate coat tails to ride. Buck up Kayleigh, it's gonna be ok.

If ever there was an “angry liberal women” trope, you certainly epitomize it. Wow.

I consider “empty shells” to be the deeply insecure posters who have wasted pages of this thread bitterly insulting a smart young woman. It’s really pathetic.

LOL


We're just having some fun. You're the one who's apoplectic. Or is that you Kayleigh?

Would you consider it “fun” if there was an entire thread devoted to tearing apart the appearance of a liberal woman? Nope. You’d consider that misogyny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's really hard to steel yourself to lie 24/7. Most people can't do it, even if paid to do so. Not only have Trump's press secretaries had to lie like everyone in his Cabinet, but they've had to explain, argue and defend their lies. It's an impossible task, and explains the high turnover at the post, as well as the emotions. They are angry and afraid that if they don't lie convincingly enough, their boss will be angry (and his anger is apparently very unpleasant).

Not a healthy job AT ALL, physically, and psychologically.

It still blows my mind that she’s a new mom and just left her kid back in Florida.

Our baby is the same age. I can’t imagine being so angry and lying everyday for living, while not seeing our kid daily. I think the only way she can do the job is if her kid is kept far away from DC. I’m convinced she has a chemical imbalance.

I was going to say because her baby is being watched by someone other than her or her husband.

She's a new mom!?...

Not bad...she's pure evil, but not bad. I guess that pull yourself up by your bootstraps isn't all bs. Cheers to hard work and determination.

Good luck to Baby McEnany overcoming parental neglect with hard work and determination. Do babies even have bootstraps?

PP

I heard her the Grandparents are taking care of the kid. I'm just saying, the woman has great bounce back. Not everybody snaps back like kids never happened. Whether it was hard work, overactive thyroid or Trump's Adderall is irrelevant. The important thing is her husband is happy.

Biden voter... I'm a good person when it counts.

[Anonymous]

OP here just chiming in to say I was not asking about her looks or her brains ... just her anger ... I think she’s attractive and smart but not gorgeous or brilliant fwiw

[Anonymous]

To be a one trick pony with this trick is really sad and pathetic

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: To be a one trick pony with this trick is really sad and pathetic

These people are grifters, liars and frauds. She has no qualms about waving around some blank paper and pretending it's evidence. I guess it's like Trump taking a blank piece of paper out of his breast pocket and pretending it's an important letter he was about to show us but changed his mind about before putting it back in his breast pocket. Wow, that seems like ages ago. One year of the Trump administration is like seven normal years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: To be a one trick pony with this trick is really sad and pathetic

These people are grifters, liars and frauds. She has no qualms about waving around some blank paper and pretending it's evidence. I guess it's like Trump taking a blank piece of paper out of his breast pocket and pretending it's an important letter he was about to show us but changed his mind about before putting it back in his breast pocket. Wow, that seems like ages ago. One year of the Trump administration is like seven normal years.

Wow that was startling evidence. I don't get how the courts are throwing out their cases with that compelling evidence right there in those notebooks. I saw them for myself -- she held them up. There were three of them.

Wow the courts are corrupt if they don't change the election results based on those very real binders. I saw them myself.

[Anonymous]

Replied to my own post above.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote: To be a one trick pony with this trick is really sad and pathetic

These people are grifters, liars and frauds. She has no qualms about waving around some blank paper and pretending it's evidence. I guess it's like Trump taking a blank piece of paper out of his breast pocket and pretending it's an important letter he was about to show us but changed his mind about before putting it back in his breast pocket. Wow, that seems like ages ago. One year of the Trump administration is like seven normal years.

Wow that was startling evidence. I don't get how the courts are throwing out their cases with that compelling evidence right there in those notebooks. I saw them for myself -- she held them up. There were three of them.

Wow the courts are corrupt if they don't change the election results based on those very real binders. I saw them myself.

This is just embarrassing.

[Anonymous]

I love their blank paper in folders trick. It is so predictable and pathetic

[Anonymous]

The transformation is complete. Meet the new Baghdad Bob.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love their blank paper in folders trick. It is so predictable and pathetic

If it weren’t so serious, it would be funny. It’s just so obvious, and it’s a trick they keep using.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The transformation is complete. Meet the new Baghdad Bob.

Someone more creative than I needs to give her a similar nickname