Why is Kayleigh McEnany so angry?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let it be known that her life isn't turning out the way she had hoped . Unlike past press secretaries , she stands little to no chance of landing a lucrative corporate gig. Additionally, she's stuck with an unemployed MLB flame out .

She’ll be just fine and it will kill you when she does indeed land a lucrative gig.

[Anonymous]

Funny how pretty, smart, women aren’t allowed to be angry - unless they’re liberal women, of course. Then they can be total b*tches and don’t you dare mention it or you’re a “misogynist” using the “angry woman” trope.

Then again, I’m hard pressed to think of any pretty, smart liberal women. Maybe that’s why they’re angry?

[Anonymous]

Is the husband really a wash out or just a free agent? 30 is still sort of young in terms of Major League Baseball. He was a first round pick.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's really my question. Her politics, etc, are a larger discussion, but her demeanor is so aggressive.

She is not dumb. She did go to Harvard, after all. But in my experience it takes a certain ability to separate oneself from the required statements the Press Secretary typically makes.

Professional detachment and ability to connect with the Press.

Instead, she over identifies - personally- with Trump and is under water with the Press she is facing. She doesn't see them as colleagues- her colleagues- and try to answer their questions showing respect for them.

Instead, she is defensive and hostile.

I suspect given the fact that she is beautiful and smart life has not prepared her for a crowd that treats her with derision every day. Its a bit of entitlement to be conditioned to being treated warmly when you are that pretty. Not her fault- just life.

Sarah Saunders looked like she would cry most times, perhaps that is because she is more used to rejection. INstead, Kayleigh is like " what is wrong with YOU , I'm Kayleigh " and she is.... but just not in this context.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

I don't even think she's pretty. She is thin, which is due to her youth and probably a lot of gym workouts, and she has blonde locks, which the POTUS likes. But she's not attractive. Her mouth is too large, and her expression is downright ugly. She needs to get her roots done more often.

Lol....come on . She is a very pretty young woman . I’m blond myself and I’m not a Trump fan - def not - and I agree she seems on edge , but she is a beautiful girl and - if she weren’t - then there would not be all these pages about her PLUS how many WAPO articles bemoaning the fact that why ???? Why?? Is this girl in Trump’s side

It’s an obsession . Admit it

Here is the reason : we are a deeply shallow country where we are raised to believe the fairy godmother is blonde with an angel expression and the wicked witch has black hair , moles and a big nose

So...why is Kayleigh so Angry you ask ??? As if it’s impossible for the fairy princess to be anything but good

That kind of stupidity allows a lot of people to get away with murder most of their lives - just sayin’

What the hell? You make no sense. We have been saying throughout this thread that she is not a fairy princess just because she has blond hair. In fact, we are saying she is the wicked witch, despite her blond hair.

"A beautiful girl"? No way in hell. And whatever good looks she may have, which are negligible, are completely wiped out by her nasty personality.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We look kind of similar in that we have similar bodies. My hair and eyes are naturally lighter, but we both have that terrible sort of hook nose anyone truly stunning would have fixed. She is tanner, which I understand some value, but she also has that leathery look and tons of sun damage that is aging. She's a pretty woman like I am a pretty woman! DC 8, NY 6, LA 4. What makes her so ugly is what's on the inside.

She’s no Hope Hicks in the beauty department.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let it be known that her life isn't turning out the way she had hoped . Unlike past press secretaries , she stands little to no chance of landing a lucrative corporate gig. Additionally, she's stuck with an unemployed MLB flame out .

She’ll be just fine and it will kill you when she does indeed land a lucrative gig.

More like absolutely no one will care what Right-wing echo chamber she ends up with. No "killing" to come.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Funny how pretty, smart, women aren’t allowed to be angry - unless they’re liberal women, of course. Then they can be total b*tches and don’t you dare mention it or you’re a “misogynist” using the “angry woman” trope.

Then again, I’m hard pressed to think of any pretty, smart liberal women. Maybe that’s why they’re angry?

Nah. You're just showing your biases here by the old "angry liberal women" trope. Bitches. Monkeys. Shrill. Shrew. We've heard it all for years and, frankly, it shows only what empty shells you all are. Attacking the looks of "liberal women" just seals the deal as to what kind of POS you are.

Kayleigh has everything going for her in life: white, blond, pretty, willing to be subservient to a bunch of men who recognize her for the useful idiot she is. Even though she is not particularly smart, articulate, or clever, I suspect that she will land quite nicely at someplace like Trump's new media enterprise, Breitbart, or some RWNJ "nonprofit." Given all of this, it is quite perplexing why she is such an angry, bitter lady. She has so much and got it through doing so little. So she lost one election? I'm sure there are other RWNJ candidate coat tails to ride. Buck up Kayleigh, it's gonna be ok.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Funny how pretty, smart, women aren’t allowed to be angry - unless they’re liberal women, of course. Then they can be total b*tches and don’t you dare mention it or you’re a “misogynist” using the “angry woman” trope.

Then again, I’m hard pressed to think of any pretty, smart liberal women. Maybe that’s why they’re angry?

Oh forget you. There is being angry for a legitimate reason, you know, an actual injustice, and there is faux anger to try and schwindle the country for your boss.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's really my question. Her politics, etc, are a larger discussion, but her demeanor is so aggressive.

She is not dumb. She did go to Harvard, after all. But in my experience it takes a certain ability to separate oneself from the required statements the Press Secretary typically makes.

Professional detachment and ability to connect with the Press.

Instead, she over identifies - personally- with Trump and is under water with the Press she is facing. She doesn't see them as colleagues- her colleagues- and try to answer their questions showing respect for them.

Instead, she is defensive and hostile.

I suspect given the fact that she is beautiful and smart life has not prepared her for a crowd that treats her with derision every day. Its a bit of entitlement to be conditioned to being treated warmly when you are that pretty. Not her fault- just life.

Sarah Saunders looked like she would cry most times, perhaps that is because she is more used to rejection. INstead, Kayleigh is like " what is wrong with YOU , I'm Kayleigh " and she is.... but just not in this context.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

I don't even think she's pretty. She is thin, which is due to her youth and probably a lot of gym workouts, and she has blonde locks, which the POTUS likes. But she's not attractive. Her mouth is too large, and her expression is downright ugly. She needs to get her roots done more often.

I just love liberals. They can’t abide pretty women who ALSO dare to be smart and well-educated. Unless they’re fellow liberals, of course... but that combination doesn’t exist.

But she isn’t pretty. It’s just Trump’s idea of pretty, which is pretty much looking like a porn star.

Sure, sure. Do you think he found Sarah Sanders attractive? How about Sean Spicer? Or could it be that he hires the best person for the job, regardless of how they look?

There’s literally no evidence that Trump hires people because they’re the best person for the job. The ability to lie and lie and lie and support fascism is a rare one; he takes whoever he can get.

[Anonymous]

hold on, people are allowed to go on and on about liberal women being so ugly yet I'm not allowed to point out some beautiful liberal women?

America Ferrera
Eva Longoria
Kerry Washington
Beyonce
Alyssa Milano
Ashley Judd
Kyrsten Sinema
Kirsten Gillebrand
AOC
Ilhan Omar

BEAUTIFUL LIBERAL WOMEN

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how pretty, smart, women aren’t allowed to be angry - unless they’re liberal women, of course. Then they can be total b*tches and don’t you dare mention it or you’re a “misogynist” using the “angry woman” trope.

Then again, I’m hard pressed to think of any pretty, smart liberal women. Maybe that’s why they’re angry?

Nah. You're just showing your biases here by the old "angry liberal women" trope. Bitches. Monkeys. Shrill. Shrew. We've heard it all for years and, frankly, it shows only what empty shells you all are. Attacking the looks of "liberal women" just seals the deal as to what kind of POS you are.

Kayleigh has everything going for her in life: white, blond, pretty, willing to be subservient to a bunch of men who recognize her for the useful idiot she is. Even though she is not particularly smart, articulate, or clever, I suspect that she will land quite nicely at someplace like Trump's new media enterprise, Breitbart, or some RWNJ "nonprofit." Given all of this, it is quite perplexing why she is such an angry, bitter lady. She has so much and got it through doing so little. So she lost one election? I'm sure there are other RWNJ candidate coat tails to ride. Buck up Kayleigh, it's gonna be ok.

This from someone who probably has spent the last twelve pages saying vile things about McEnany? Sure, pretend it’s others who are desperately insecure and ugly (inside and out). So much projection.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how pretty, smart, women aren’t allowed to be angry - unless they’re liberal women, of course. Then they can be total b*tches and don’t you dare mention it or you’re a “misogynist” using the “angry woman” trope.

Then again, I’m hard pressed to think of any pretty, smart liberal women. Maybe that’s why they’re angry?

Oh forget you. There is being angry for a legitimate reason, you know, an actual injustice, and there is faux anger to try and schwindle the country for your boss.

Is this the 80’s? Also, it’s “swindle.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how pretty, smart, women aren’t allowed to be angry - unless they’re liberal women, of course. Then they can be total b*tches and don’t you dare mention it or you’re a “misogynist” using the “angry woman” trope.

Then again, I’m hard pressed to think of any pretty, smart liberal women. Maybe that’s why they’re angry?

Oh forget you. There is being angry for a legitimate reason, you know, an actual injustice, and there is faux anger to try and schwindle the country for your boss.

Is this the 80’s? Also, it’s “swindle.”

DP. 1. I’m guessing PP is referencing the radio edit version of Cee Lo Green song from 2010, so not “the 80s.” 2. “Schwindle” appears to be slang for swindle.

[Anonymous]

She’s raging inside and hates herself because she has to go on the news and state that Trump will attend his own inauguration. She knows he’s delusional and and she looks delusional too.

[Anonymous]

Her poor baby. History won’t be kind to her Mom Eva Braun.