Bethesda Magazine College Bound Chart for 2020 grads

[Anonymous]

You really need help.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:UT Austin had lower acceptance than Michigan, Chapel Hill or Berkeley and decent number of applicants. That surprised me a bit.

We know an admissions officer at Rice who told us OTR that Texas schools admit fewer people from MOCO to guard against the generally lower of the low yield rates from these students.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very interesting. Calculated the acceptance rates for schools that are frequently mentioned or compared on DCUM. (Didn't do Ivy League. They ranged from about 5% to 15% for Cornell.)

Duke 8.7%
Northwestern 9.4%
Rice 16.7%
UVA 18.5%
UNC 18.7%
GA Tech 19.1%
Vanderbilt 19.9%
Amherst 20.0%
Carnegie Mellon 22.1%
UCLA 22.8%
WashU 23.1%
Emory 27.1%
Notre Dam 27.3%
UC Berkeley 27.5%
Georgetown 29.7%
Michigan 30.1%
NYU 33.0%
Williams 34.1%
W&M 43.1%
Wisconsin 50.7%
VA Tech 60.1%
UMD 64.1%
Pitt 71.1%
Penn St. 76.6%

Sure supports the Pitt, UMD, VA Tech and Penn St. as safety schools theme we often see here.

Very hard to get into UVA, UNC and GA Tech from Bethesda. Easier to get into Michigan, Berkeley and UCLA. And Vandy, Emory and WashU for that matter.

Wow, Montgomery County. Good luck getting into UVA! No wonder so many of you are bitter about the school. Your kids aren't getting in. Now we get it. But there's always Michigan, or Georgetown, or Emory. Your kids will be fine I'm sure.

Emory and Georgetown are better schools so I'm sure they will be.

Michigan is ranked higher than all three of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:UT Austin had lower acceptance than Michigan, Chapel Hill or Berkeley and decent number of applicants. That surprised me a bit.

We know an admissions officer at Rice who told us OTR that Texas schools admit fewer people from MOCO to guard against the generally lower of the low yield rates from these students.

How can a Rice admissions offer speak off the record for UT Austin?

[Anonymous]

Wow. Churchill is impressive!

[Anonymous]

Do people realize that they are commenting on a thread that is three years old?

[Anonymous]

Finally someone else noticed!

[Anonymous]

There is new data from Bethesda magazine

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The stats are definitely making me reconsider the magnet programs. I’m puzzled by the modest admissions stats for such high achieving kids.

Again, people need to remember it’s not everyone’s goal to go to a US News Top 20 school, UMD has a top ranked Comp Sci program, and these stats are self reported by the students. The school where they are going is probably accurate but they may not have indicated in Naviance where else they were accepted.

Do they list these excuses in the school website for parents?

So students at the magnet programs should not trust Naviance when assessing their college choices. Ok.

Probably the rampant grade inflation hurts as well. Almost 80% of the class had a weighted GPA of 4.5 or higher. When everyone has a GPA that high it’s no longer a useful stat.

Naviaiance is not useful for any high scoring kid. Naviance told my kid they would likely get into every top 10 school...when clearly only a small fraction of kids with perfecgt GPAs and test scores get acceptances. That is regardless of what high school one attends.

My kid opted for free tuition at UMD over full pay at a top 10. I doubt we are the only family who made similar choices.

Then you have no basis for thinking that the kids who opt out of applying to top 20 schools to go to UMD would have been anything other than another rejected kid.

It does point out that the perfect GPA is a red herring - not a useful thing to cite at all.

+1

If my DC can go to UMD for free in an honors program to boot, that will be the choice over T10 full pay.

[Anonymous]

I compiled number from two years ago here:

https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/390/1147430.page#25760563