new Reade/Biden thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow you people are hypocritical pigs if your defense of Biden raping a woman hangs on a dress code violation. He’s gotta go as the nominee. Trump will win for sure.

Well, fortunately, it doesn't hinge on that. He's not going anywhere. He's the nominee, warts and all. I think Biden will still win because Trump has set the bar pretty low.

+1.

Also, nobody, but nobody, has said the "whole defense hinges on a dress code violation." That's a straw man/red herring.

There's so much more.
- Her story has changed significantly over the years (including editing her 2019 Medium post two days before coming out with her new charges in April)
- Questions about her loyalty to the Bernie wing of the Dem party (not to mention all the Putin love)
- Charging the horse nonprofit for her own horse's veterinarian and stealing items from their raffle
- There are dozens of credible allegations against Trump vs. one against Biden
- Trump is destroying the economy
- Trump is mismanaging COVID
- Trump is tearing the civil fabric of this country apart
... and so much more

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

Yes that would be good. And not an unelected Hollywood actress.

[Anonymous]

Biden doesn't need Bernie voters to win, and women showed in the last election that they don't care about even credible allegations.

Republicans are panicking because they are definitely going to lose the Senate and very very likely going to lose the presidential election. So they're on this tip now. They're slimeballs who have no credibility. And if you support them, so are you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigh...man I wish we had better options for politicians. it is all becoming oh so predictable with these folks. Wouldn't trust any of them with anyone I cared about...of either party. Anyone smart, balanced and sane wouldn't run for office, at least at the Federal level.

I will sit this one out...

Amen...+1

Make that a +1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigh...man I wish we had better options for politicians. it is all becoming oh so predictable with these folks. Wouldn't trust any of them with anyone I cared about...of either party. Anyone smart, balanced and sane wouldn't run for office, at least at the Federal level.

I will sit this one out...

Amen...+1

Make that a +1000

Anybody else suspect a lot of sock-puppetting from the "sit this one out" and "find a new candidate quick" posters? This all serves Trump and nobody else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biden doesn't need Bernie voters to win, and women showed in the last election that they don't care about even credible allegations.

Republicans are panicking because they are definitely going to lose the Senate and very very likely going to lose the presidential election. So they're on this tip now. They're slimeballs who have no credibility. And if you support them, so are you.

This x1000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigh...man I wish we had better options for politicians. it is all becoming oh so predictable with these folks. Wouldn't trust any of them with anyone I cared about...of either party. Anyone smart, balanced and sane wouldn't run for office, at least at the Federal level.

I will sit this one out...

Amen...+1

Make that a +1000

Anybody else suspect a lot of sock-puppetting from the "sit this one out" and "find a new candidate quick" posters? This all serves Trump and nobody else.

Oh yeah.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigh...man I wish we had better options for politicians. it is all becoming oh so predictable with these folks. Wouldn't trust any of them with anyone I cared about...of either party. Anyone smart, balanced and sane wouldn't run for office, at least at the Federal level.

I will sit this one out...

Amen...+1

Make that a +1000

Anybody else suspect a lot of sock-puppetting from the "sit this one out" and "find a new candidate quick" posters? This all serves Trump and nobody else.

Oh yeah.

No. Because that is exactly what the petulant childish progressives did in 2016 when Clinton won the Democratic nomination over Sanders. They stomped their feet and stayed home and did their part to help Trump win the election. It's why I no longer care to accept their arguments as significant for a progressive candidate. If they aren't willing to to vote for a moderate, then they need to own the fact that they contributed to the regression of our government and the trending Conservatism that allowed a Republican president to put a very conservative justice on the Supreme Court.

Their opinions along with the opinions of the young who can take the time to rally but can't take the time to vote are less important. Those who don't take the time to vote, get less voice in the selection process and I'm fine with that. You want a seat at the table, then show up in November.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigh...man I wish we had better options for politicians. it is all becoming oh so predictable with these folks. Wouldn't trust any of them with anyone I cared about...of either party. Anyone smart, balanced and sane wouldn't run for office, at least at the Federal level.

I will sit this one out...

Amen...+1

Make that a +1000

Anybody else suspect a lot of sock-puppetting from the "sit this one out" and "find a new candidate quick" posters? This all serves Trump and nobody else.

Um - you actually believe that ANYONE in the DCUM politics forum either 1) won’t vote or 2) is undecided???

Now that’s rich.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigh...man I wish we had better options for politicians. it is all becoming oh so predictable with these folks. Wouldn't trust any of them with anyone I cared about...of either party. Anyone smart, balanced and sane wouldn't run for office, at least at the Federal level.

I will sit this one out...

Amen...+1

Make that a +1000

Anybody else suspect a lot of sock-puppetting from the "sit this one out" and "find a new candidate quick" posters? This all serves Trump and nobody else.

Um - you actually believe that ANYONE in the DCUM politics forum either 1) won’t vote or 2) is undecided???

Now that’s rich.

Well there were Sanders supporters in 2016 who claimed that they sat out the election when Clinton didn't get the nomination. As an anonymous forum, it's hard to tell whether they were just saying that or if they really did.

[Anonymous]

I believe Biden 100%. Reade’s story doesn’t hold water.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:#believesomewomen

You’re stupid to think supporting women and those speaking out in the MeToo moment means every woman is by default talking the truth. You think we can’t see through people attempting to manipulate the system? There are false accusers on the left, right and middle. Whataboutism is old and makes you look incompetent, unable to truly discuss why someone that supports Russia, that lied multiple times, that changes her story as often as other liars do, should be trusted. You can support women and not suooort corruption and liars.. For example, I believe some Michael Jackson accusers, and I believe a few others jumped on the bandwagon for money.

Only Trumpters denominate a valid substantiated position to a left field and inaccurate conclusion that not believing Tara Reid means you don’t support all women in the time of a #MeToo movement.

It has to eat you up that your nominee is a predator and Obama was out playing golf the day after Michelle told all the poors not to leave their houses. It’s all been a lie folks. Can you even get those bumper stickers off your cars after all these years?

There it is. They'll never get over their hate of the black man who dared lift his head.

Yup. Drove them so nuts they had to elect the most venal, corrupt, unqualified, uneducated person they could find.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sigh...man I wish we had better options for politicians. it is all becoming oh so predictable with these folks. Wouldn't trust any of them with anyone I cared about...of either party. Anyone smart, balanced and sane wouldn't run for office, at least at the Federal level.

I will sit this one out...

Amen...+1

Make that a +1000

Anybody else suspect a lot of sock-puppetting from the "sit this one out" and "find a new candidate quick" posters? This all serves Trump and nobody else.

Oh yeah.

Yup. Nothing like the smell of desperation on a Friday afternoon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman should be believed unless they are accusing a Democrat. Got it.

This is really what it boils down to. Even Democrats know how hypocritical they are; they just refuse to admit it.

You just don't get it.

Nobody ever said every woman should be BELIEVED. It's ridiculous to say you believe every woman. Just like men, some women lie.

Many feminists say every woman should be HEARD. Then we can decide if we believe them.

BS The dem talking point was EVERY WOMEN SHOULD BE BELIEVED. You can't rewrite history because your boy Joe is stuck.

BS. Get us a cite from somewhere credible

Yes that would be good. And not an unelected Hollywood actress.

Didn't Mazie Hirono say "they need to be believed"?