Peter Strzok and Andy McCabe file wrongful termination lawsuits

[Anonymous]

The lawsuit for FOIA was the lawsuit in question - not the wrongful termination.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what do we think the agreement was?

Somebody's singing.

Who is? I don’t get the significance or implications.

They are interviewing the people involved in the DOJ and CIA. If McCabe thinks the truth is coming out about what role he may have played ("the insurance policy"), he realizes he should drop the suit alleging he was wrongfully fired.

Yeah, no. That's not how any of this works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what do we think the agreement was?

Somebody's singing.

Who is? I don’t get the significance or implications.

They are interviewing the people involved in the DOJ and CIA. If McCabe thinks the truth is coming out about what role he may have played ("the insurance policy"), he realizes he should drop the suit alleging he was wrongfully fired.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what do we think the agreement was?

Somebody's singing.

Who is? I don’t get the significance or implications.

They are interviewing the people involved in the DOJ and CIA. If McCabe thinks the truth is coming out about what role he may have played ("the insurance policy"), he realizes he should drop the suit alleging he was wrongfully fired.

Exactly.

No, not at all. What’s pictured above is not someone “dropping” a lawsuit. You’re listening to dumb people on Twitter and on your TV.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So what do we think the agreement was?

Somebody's singing.

Who is? I don’t get the significance or implications.

They are interviewing the people involved in the DOJ and CIA. If McCabe thinks the truth is coming out about what role he may have played ("the insurance policy"), he realizes he should drop the suit alleging he was wrongfully fired.

Exactly.

No, not at all. What’s pictured above is not someone “dropping” a lawsuit. You’re listening to dumb people on Twitter and on your TV.

+1 It's a stipulation agreement. It means they made a deal and therefore the case is essentially moot. Since we aren't told the terms of the deal, we can't draw any conclusions about what it means.

[Anonymous]

Didn’t McCabe lie under oath?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t McCabe lie under oath?

Didn't the president pressure Sessions to fire him and, Sessions fire him improperly?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The lawsuit for FOIA was the lawsuit in question - not the wrongful termination.

Seems to be. It's being widely reported as the wrongful termination lawsuit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t McCabe lie under oath?

And isn’t there a currently impaneled grand jury who has so far refused to charge him with anything?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t McCabe lie under oath?

No.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The lawsuit for FOIA was the lawsuit in question - not the wrongful termination.

Seems to be. It's being widely reported as the wrongful termination lawsuit.

I didn't say that well.

I meant, it's being widely but incorrectly reported as the wrongful termination lawsuit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t McCabe lie under oath?

He's accused of "lack of candor" not lying. Lack of candor means that he knowingly failed to be 100% clear or failed to provide 100% of the relevant facts. It's a much more stringent standard than lying, but it's also harder to prove. It's harder to prove because it's somewhat subjective. Was he unclear or just misunderstood? If he left something out, was it intentional? Was it really relevant?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The lawsuit for FOIA was the lawsuit in question - not the wrongful termination.

Seems to be. It's being widely reported as the wrongful termination lawsuit.

The Plaintiff in the suit is Snyder (the lawyer), so it clearly is not the Strzok/McCabe WT suit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The lawsuit for FOIA was the lawsuit in question - not the wrongful termination.

Seems to be. It's being widely reported as the wrongful termination lawsuit.

The Plaintiff in the suit is Snyder (the lawyer), so it clearly is not the Strzok/McCabe WT suit.

It must be this lawsuit. https://www.foiaadvisor.com/home/2018/6/13/foia-news-former-fbi-official-andrew-mccabe-files-foia-lawsuit-against-fbi-doj-doj-oig

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn’t McCabe lie under oath?

Didn't the president pressure Sessions to fire him and, Sessions fire him improperly?

Nope.