Peter Strzok and Andy McCabe file wrongful termination lawsuits

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So he didn’t lie to investigators?

Yes. Yes, he did.
But, this is Biden's DOJ now. Lying doesn't seem to matter if you're on "the right side."

Can't say I expected a different outcome. When they refused to prosecute him, it opened the door for him to sue.

By “they” you mean the grand jury, right? That’s who refused to prosecute him. The DOJ certainly tried.

And that happened during Trump's presidency, not Biden's. It was Trump's grand jury who refused to prosecute him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So he didn’t lie to investigators?

Yes. Yes, he did.
But, this is Biden's DOJ now. Lying doesn't seem to matter if you're on "the right side."

Can't say I expected a different outcome. When they refused to prosecute him, it opened the door for him to sue.

When Trump wrongfully fired him, that opened the door for him to sue.

[Anonymous]

This isn’t a lack of candor issue. This is a termination due process issue. Trump and company violated his due process. Any employment law novice knew this would be the eventual outcome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t a lack of candor issue. This is a termination due process issue. Trump and company violated his due process. Any employment law novice knew this would be the eventual outcome.

Yes, people who are not brainless partisans understand this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So he didn’t lie to investigators?

No he didn’t. Trumps DOJ tried to get an indictment on this, but their case was so horrible that a grand jury rejected it.

[Anonymous]

The US DOJ says that evidence was *altered* by St. Louis FBI/DOJ employees in their review of Andy McCabe and Peter Strzok’s investigation of Mike Flynn.


https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.259.0_4.pdf


This will get interesting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The US DOJ says that evidence was *altered* by St. Louis FBI/DOJ employees in their review of Andy McCabe and Peter Strzok’s investigation of Mike Flynn.


https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.259.0_4.pdf


This will get interesting.

Old news.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The US DOJ says that evidence was *altered* by St. Louis FBI/DOJ employees in their review of Andy McCabe and Peter Strzok’s investigation of Mike Flynn.


https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.259.0_4.pdf


This will get interesting.

Between this case, the mishandling of the Larry Nasser gymnast sexual abuses, the fact that FBI got advance warning of 1/6 and did absolutely nothing about it... FBI needs to do some serious house cleaning. They were already notoriously "Trumpland" during the Clinton campaign and only went more and more downhill after that.

[Anonymous]

I like the cufflinks touch. I just watched the Comey Rule where he is criticized because of his cufflinks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The US DOJ says that evidence was *altered* by St. Louis FBI/DOJ employees in their review of Andy McCabe and Peter Strzok’s investigation of Mike Flynn.


https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.259.0_4.pdf


This will get interesting.

Between this case, the mishandling of the Larry Nasser gymnast sexual abuses, the fact that FBI got advance warning of 1/6 and did absolutely nothing about it... FBI needs to do some serious house cleaning. They were already notoriously "Trumpland" during the Clinton campaign and only went more and more downhill after that.

+1
They’re really gross. That Nasser thing was absolutely the lowest of the low and just totally baffling. Why didn’t the FBI agent take the report seriously? I’m not ignorant of the fact that sexual assault is not taken seriously (here’s an example of a woman dying because the police didn’t take another woman’s reported rape and attempted homicide seriously https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/09/nyregion/khalil-wheeler-weaver-new-jersey.html), but I hold the FBI to a higher standard. Or I used to.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

What does privilege over the testimony mean

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The US DOJ says that evidence was *altered* by St. Louis FBI/DOJ employees in their review of Andy McCabe and Peter Strzok’s investigation of Mike Flynn.


https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.259.0_4.pdf


This will get interesting.

Between this case, the mishandling of the Larry Nasser gymnast sexual abuses, the fact that FBI got advance warning of 1/6 and did absolutely nothing about it... FBI needs to do some serious house cleaning. They were already notoriously "Trumpland" during the Clinton campaign and only went more and more downhill after that.

+1
They’re really gross. That Nasser thing was absolutely the lowest of the low and just totally baffling. Why didn’t the FBI agent take the report seriously? I’m not ignorant of the fact that sexual assault is not taken seriously (here’s an example of a woman dying because the police didn’t take another woman’s
reported rape and attempted homicide seriously https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/09/nyregion/khalil-wheeler-weaver-new-jersey.html), but I hold the FBI to a higher standard. Or I used to.

Not following. Who are saying was responsible for these failures of the FBI? People at FBI or White House?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's not illegal to have an affair.

I do believe it's illegal to be a blatant partisan (in any direction) while also serving as a supposedly "impartial" FBI Director.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's not illegal to have an affair.

I do believe it's illegal to be a blatant partisan (in any direction) while also serving as a supposedly "impartial" FBI Director.

Just to clarify - what other offices do you think it should be 'illegal' to be seemingly partisan while holding?