Same in Asia. This is one example where US practices are simply barbaric. |
+1 |
1. Babies do get anaesthesia. 2. Babies don't get erections. |
Number 2 is actually not true. Baby genitals can get engorged for all sorts of reasons. Baby boys’ penises are not always completely flaccid. Number 1 is not true all the time. |
Seriously?
|
Agree. I also don't get how inflamed the discussion on this is. It's almost as bad as SAH vs WOH!!
|
There is absolutely NO analogy to this regarding women. Has someone ever snipped off part of your clitoris? Such a dumb argument. Giving birth is not an analogy. Womens bodies are designed to give birth.
|
And men's bodies are designed with a foreskin. |
PP, let me speak slowly so you understand my point. I am anti-circ. My point was simply that ppl arguing for infant circ by claiming adult circ is so awful are being silly. If an adult wants to get himself circumcised, it’s not like open heart surgery. He’ll recover fine. |
Exactly! I’m very protective against unnecessary (painful!) medical procedures for my baby. When that baby grows up to be a man it will be his decision to undergo painful procedures, be it tattoos, piercings or genital mutilation. Why do you feel entitled to make those decisions for your sons? |
It IS less clean, that’s not debatable. Uncircumcised penises are more prone to fungus infections STD etc bc harder to keep clean. That’s where the tradition comes from! |
| One word: smegma. Ewwww |
Wow. You know most men outside the US are not circumcised, and have no trouble finding sex partners. You might not want to blazon your shocking insularity abroad. |
We no longer live in the dessert without water. Do you plan to eventually use Q-tips to clean your boy's ears? And later even teach him how to properly clean his own ears? Just checking!
|
Because we are his parents. |