I agree. My daughter hasn’t played with any of her classmates since leaving Rec Soccer 4 years ago. There is life and social groups outside of school and classmates. |
| US Youth Soccer has asked its State Association Presidents to provide feedback on the impacts that occurred when changes were made from a school year to calendar year, and what they’d foresee as impacts if we went back. |
| How is soccer different from any other sport, rec versus travel |
Totally agree. I always thought it was a good thing for my kids to meet other kids outside of their school and neighborhood groups. They made plenty of good and different friends that way - many of which have grown and persisted outside soccer. |
Costs more .
|
I was going to say cheaper |
Only issues with any validity as far as I am concerned are (1) birth year does complicate college recruitment somewhat (2) the act of changing from one EOY date to another is disruptive and a pain for clubs, coaches, kids and parents and should be avoided again if possible. |
rec cheaper than travel. But travel soccer costs more than other travel sports. |
It will only cause more kids to quit — I don’t really have a Preference between the two, but the change itself was incredibly disruptive and shouldn’t happen to the same generation of kids again. |
Kids are leaving soccer and not coming back. |
From experience, soccer is far cheaper than volleyball and softball |
College recruitment issues is not a problem for youth soccer to solve. Players reach out to coaches and inform them of their graduation year. Coaches watch player at a showcase or ID Camp and the problem is solved. College coaches don’t really watch random tournament games to window shop. |
Agreed. The kids are on teams that have now been together for awhile and are just returning to play with COVID restrictions. Why disrupt that? I disagreed with this change when it was made but if they want to go back, they should roll it in for younger groups. Like K-1 and just let it work it’s way through. |
I totally agree with this. My kids were really hurt when the age groups changed, but now that they are older, changing back wouldn't make much of a difference. Personally, I preferred the older age group, mostly because of the year when part of a team is in 8th grade and part is in 9th. However, if they change it back, I hope it is phased in for younger kids only. I don't even understand any of these discussions anyway. US Soccer makes policies for the thousands of kids playing soccer based on concerns that might only impact the top 1% of players. If coaches and scouts were better at assessing talent, there would be no need to play with age groups. We should be less concerned with identifying the top 1% and more concerned with the vast majority of players who will never be professionals or on the national team. Let's care about keeping them playing soccer as long as possible. |
Cheaper than year-round swimming too |