Women are "Damaged Goods" after 30..

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://jezebel.com/mens-favorite-ages-are-20-21-22-and-23-a-data-dive-1731660984

Data indicates age preference for men. Perhaps not a representative sample, but then again neither is the NYT wedding announcement section.

[Anonymous]

I think the issue is that most normal, attractive, women will naturally fall into a serious relationship at some point before they turn 35 or so. This is true of normal, attractive men too, but since men tend to date younger women, the typical cutoff is a little later (like 40ish). If it hasn't happened by then, there is usually some reason, hence the fear that you are "damaged goods" (crazy, a commitment-phobe, hung up on an ex, whatever). It's the same reason women are suspicious of a never-married guy over 40.

However, there are also lots of other possible reasons/explanations for being single later in life, like a breakup, moving around a lot for school/career, etc. In any case, I wouldn't worry about it too much - the guys you will be dating will be in the same boat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You know what's makes you a damaged goods? Being a raging misogynist asshole who is obsessed with women's looks and fertility expiring on some magical deadline so that will make them departed enough to settle for your ass.

NP. + 1000. We would get along in real life!

It's also funny how these guys don't realize how very low-status it is to want to date 20 year olds. Highly educated and successful men in their 30s want to date peers, not recent college grads with temp jobs.

Go get those peers. Personally I'm assuming that other men at all income levels pick cute rather than worrying about peers or status. Actually, we've referred to women as hot, fat, nuts, or fun, but never "low-status".

You're trash, then. In DC and NY all the educated, cultured men (yes, this excludes a lot of wall street types) look for peers. They want intelligent women who have good jobs and college/grad school pedigrees and will pass on good genes to their kids. 30-something bro types calling their same-age peers "damaged goods" are extremely low-value men who can't attract high quality women.

... and if you don't believe me, just look at the NYTimes wedding announcements. The high quality 30-something men are marrying 30-something women who are doctors, lawyers, and otherwise extremely accomplished.

You insane person. 1. Real people don't care about the New York Times wedding announcements!
2. People worth spending time with don't mutter about "high-quality". You sound like a gold-digger doing that.
3. Educational opportunities have nothing to do with good genes. Are you stupid? That illegal immigrant has better genes than a bunch of inbred Ivy Leagers.
4. Most men - providers, good husbands, good fathers - want intelligent women (a dime a dozen here) who are ambitious enough to work _somewhere_ doing _something_, and who are fun enough and pretty enough. We. Don't. Care. About. Your. Career. Until we're in it together for the long haul, or you are a medical doctor of course. Do not consider dating an exchange of resumes unless you want to fail at this.
5. Advising women to shoot for rich, Ivy League men is stupid from a supply-and-demand perspective. Why not limit your prospects further based on height and coming-over-on-the-Mayflower ancestry? Then bitch about being single for a long time.
6. Anyone calling people all the time "trash" or "low-value" is not by definition "high-quality". You could look like an angel, but you will not be valued. You sound like a cat lady to be avoided.
7. Not a 30-year-old. I was married for years, I'm raising a daughter, and I have an idea of what makes a relationship work. Resumes have nothing to do with it.

% of Americans with Mayflower ancestry = 12%
% of Americans with Ivy League degrees = 0.4%

Never settle!!

Dude no, that's lights off sex only- there is a reason the "swirliest" people in the world tend to be the hottest.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://jezebel.com/mens-favorite-ages-are-20-21-22-and-23-a-data-dive-1731660984

Data indicates age preference for men. Perhaps not a representative sample, but then again neither is the NYT wedding announcement section.

lol - male delusion in one easy chart

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
You, my friend, are low-status trash who will never attract a high quality woman.

lol, you know nothing about me. Enjoy crying yourself to sleep.

Are you over 30 in DC? If you're not trash, you'd have several relationships under your belt by now with attractive, intelligent, and successful women, such as doctors, lawyers, economists, policy experts ... if you are a 30+ man in DC and are dating 22 year old temps, you are a total loser.

I am a 50s man, and when I date 25-year-olds they are usually law students or PhD candidates.

ew gross (think their 25 year old friends).