FBI wire tapped Manafort

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Obama and his cronies were essentially wiretapping the campaign of a political opponent?

Imagine that. Anyone surprised?

Exactly. This is the essence of it.


Confirmation of what everyone knew or at least suspected, but every democrat earnestly denied.


And now we know.

No, but we know Trump supporters are dumb as hell.

Truer words have never been posted. The FBI is not Obama and Manafort is not Trump Tower.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[

Intelligent? Someone who claims that there is treason when there is no proof? I voted for Trump. I have yet to see evidence of collusion.

And, FWIW, most "intelligent" people do not "universally" think that Trump supporters are dumb. I guess unless you mean all those movie stars who supported HRC. Not sure how intelligent they are. I guess they are intelligent enough to make lots and lots of money that enables them to tell others what to do. Other than that, most are pretty uninformed.

Most truly intelligent people can think for themselves. Sure, some Trump supporters are dumb. So are Hillary supporters. And, some are intelligent.

Frankly, I'm beginning to seriously doubt HRC's intelligence. She certainly lacks common sense and is in serious denial. She did not understand the importance of classified information and, apparently thought, that in order for something to be classified it had to say so. That is pretty dumb thing for the SecState to think. Either that or she is a liar.......

Pretty rich coming from someone who blindly is supporting a President who shared Israeli secrets with the Russians and who tweeted classified information about one of our Asian partners a few months ago. Seriously, there is nothing in the whataboutism game that Trump doesn't trump. Especially when the Chair of the so called Election Commission uses private emails knowingly and refuses to use FOIA-able emails for official business.

(sorry for the pun)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Libs, listen to a former judge explain FISA and article 3

Wow, another Comey's perjury. Why is Jeff Sessions not investigating any of these abuse of power by the former administration?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs, listen to a former judge explain FISA and article 3

Wow, another Comey's perjury. Why is Jeff Sessions not investigating any of these abuse of power by the former administration?

For the third time in this thread, Sessions' Justice Department has finished that investigation and there's no evidence that the former administration did anything wrong.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/02/obama-trump-tower-wiretap-no-evidence-242284

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Libs, listen to a former judge explain FISA and article 3

Wow, another Comey's perjury. Why is Jeff Sessions not investigating any of these abuse of power by the former administration?

What is your first language?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Thank you, but I wasn't attempting to be clever. Intelligent adults universally think that Trump supporters are dumb. I mean, this has been explained to you over and over and over, just in this thread, to say nothing of everyone elsewhere explaining it. This wasn't a personal vendetta of Obama's. Trump wasn't "wire-tapped." If you're actually an American, you should think about why you're cool with treason and its lawful reception by the courts. You got conned. Why you were susceptible to that is for you to work through, but we'll be waiting over here with open arms.

Intelligent? Someone who claims that there is treason when there is no proof? I voted for Trump. I have yet to see evidence of collusion.

And, FWIW, most "intelligent" people do not "universally" think that Trump supporters are dumb. I guess unless you mean all those movie stars who supported HRC. Not sure how intelligent they are. I guess they are intelligent enough to make lots and lots of money that enables them to tell others what to do. Other than that, most are pretty uninformed.

Most truly intelligent people can think for themselves. Sure, some Trump supporters are dumb. So are Hillary supporters. And, some are intelligent.

Frankly, I'm beginning to seriously doubt HRC's intelligence. She certainly lacks common sense and is in serious denial. She did not understand the importance of classified information and, apparently thought, that in order for something to be classified it had to say so. That is pretty dumb thing for the SecState to think. Either that or she is a liar.......

Um.... it does. The word "Confidential" has to be stamped on every page to be protected.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Then Comey committed perjury as he said under oath in front of Congress that there wasn't any surveillance at Trump Tower.

No, that's not what he said. But since you raised this, let me ask you....during the campaign, the GOP supporters said that the means by which the DNC emails were obtained were not important, but rather it was the substance of the emails.

In this case, we are at the tip of the iceberg around potential treason. But you seem to be more concerned about the method of data collection (which to date has been 100% fully legal.) Why is that? Do you not care about treason, conspiracy and collusion?

Was the question ever answered?

[Anonymous]

Just another nothing burger

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/paul-manafort-surveillance-during-2016-campaign/

The intercepts potentially include conversations between Manafort and President Trump.

[Anonymous]

FUN FACT: The DNI under Obama (Clapper) stated he wasn't aware of any FISA wiretapping of the opposing party

[Anonymous]

And there would often not be a reason why the DNI would know about it. Why is that a fun fact?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FUN FACT: The DNI under Obama (Clapper) stated he wasn't aware of any FISA wiretapping of the opposing party

Potential perjury, huh?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FUN FACT: The DNI under Obama (Clapper) stated he wasn't aware of any FISA wiretapping of the opposing party

Potential perjury, huh?

Why? Or better yet, not necessarily. DNI's aren't kept privy of every FISA or other action that happens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FUN FACT: The DNI under Obama (Clapper) stated he wasn't aware of any FISA wiretapping of the opposing party

Potential perjury, huh?

No, Obama was running a shadow surveillance program of the Trump campaign for obvious reasons. Only a matter of time before the facts come out and we see the crooks of the 44 administration. This is worse than Watergate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Obama and his cronies were essentially wiretapping the campaign of a political opponent?

Imagine that. Anyone surprised?

Exactly. This is the essence of it.


Confirmation of what everyone knew or at least suspected, but every democrat earnestly denied.


And now we know.

No, but we know Trump supporters are dumb as hell.

Truer words have never been posted. The FBI is not Obama and Manafort is not Trump Tower.

True except for the fact that it's not true, LOLz.


The FBI is the Justice Dept, which is the AG, which IS essentially the President.

Manafort is Trump Tower, and therefore Trump, because Manafort is TALKING to Trump!

The President was using all the intel assets available to the executive branch to spy on a political opponent of his preferred successor. It really IS that simple.


Logical extension Inst your strong suit, is it? Poor thing...... I feel so sorry for you.






Ask yourself this: what would your reaction be if you discovered that George W Bush had been using all the resources of the govt to spy on the Obama campaign by wiretapping Valerie Jarrat? Would you REALLY believe that Jarrat was the target of the investigation? Of course not. It's plainly obvious who the intended target is, Jarrat is just a portal to surveil Obama without getting the actual warrant FOR Obama.

So what would your reaction be if the roles were 100% reversed?

We already know the answer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Truer words have never been posted. The FBI is not Obama and Manafort is not Trump Tower.

True except for the fact that it's not true, LOLz.


The FBI is the Justice Dept, which is the AG, which IS essentially the President.

Manafort is Trump Tower, and therefore Trump, because Manafort is TALKING to Trump!

The President was using all the intel assets available to the executive branch to spy on a political opponent of his preferred successor. It really IS that simple.


Logical extension Inst your strong suit, is it? Poor thing...... I feel so sorry for you.






Ask yourself this: what would your reaction be if you discovered that George W Bush had been using all the resources of the govt to spy on the Obama campaign by wiretapping Valerie Jarrat? Would you REALLY believe that Jarrat was the target of the investigation? Of course not. It's plainly obvious who the intended target is, Jarrat is just a portal to surveil Obama without getting the actual warrant FOR Obama.

So what would your reaction be if the roles were 100% reversed?

We already know the answer.

If Valerie Jarrett had been conspiring with the Russians to fund activities illegally and influence American voters illegally, then I would be glad the IC was doing its job. Why are you justifying or excusing collusion and coordination with the Russians?