FBI wire tapped Manafort

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These phony investigations by the inside crowd in DC
are just money grabs. Ken Starr, Benghazi & Russian collusion -- it's all just BS so attorneys can get big money.

AGAIN, please explain how lawyers who are now working for government salaries are getting "big money."

Just curious.......Do YOU know what they are being paid?

Because the DOJ operates off the public GS scale, dolt:
https://www.justice.gov/legal-careers/attorney-salaries-promotions-and-benefits

https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/2017/general-schedule/

Not for outside counsel. Stop spreading BS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These phony investigations by the inside crowd in DC
are just money grabs. Ken Starr, Benghazi & Russian collusion -- it's all just BS so attorneys can get big money.

AGAIN, please explain how lawyers who are now working for government salaries are getting "big money."

Just curious.......Do YOU know what they are being paid?

Because the DOJ operates off the public GS scale, dolt:
https://www.justice.gov/legal-careers/attorney-salaries-promotions-and-benefits

https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/2017/general-schedule/

Not for outside counsel. Stop spreading BS.

Who on Mueller's team is operating as "outside counsel," dolt?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These phony investigations by the inside crowd in DC
are just money grabs. Ken Starr, Benghazi & Russian collusion -- it's all just BS so attorneys can get big money.

AGAIN, please explain how lawyers who are now working for government salaries are getting "big money."

Just curious.......Do YOU know what they are being paid?

Because the DOJ operates off the public GS scale, dolt:
https://www.justice.gov/legal-careers/attorney-salaries-promotions-and-benefits

https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/2017/general-schedule/

You have no idea how much they are being paid. (Dolt)

It is unclear precisely how much each is getting paid to work on the Russia investigation — the special counsel’s office has declined to make its budget proposal public — though it is probably a far cry from their private-sector work.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/mueller-several-team-members-gave-up-million-dollar-jobs-to-work-on-special-counsel-investigation/2017/08/08/e11169da-7b78-11e7-83c7-5bd5460f0d7e_story.html?utm_term=.943a884bb9e2

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/special-counsel-submits-his-proposed-budget-but-wont-make-it-public/2017/07/07/a991f89a-6326-11e7-8adc-fea80e32bf47_story.html?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.5f0a03f81046

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These phony investigations by the inside crowd in DC
are just money grabs. Ken Starr, Benghazi & Russian collusion -- it's all just BS so attorneys can get big money.

AGAIN, please explain how lawyers who are now working for government salaries are getting "big money."

Just curious.......Do YOU know what they are being paid?

Because the DOJ operates off the public GS scale, dolt:
https://www.justice.gov/legal-careers/attorney-salaries-promotions-and-benefits

https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/2017/general-schedule/

You have no idea how much they are being paid. (Dolt)

It is unclear precisely how much each is getting paid to work on the Russia investigation — the special counsel’s office has declined to make its budget proposal public — though it is probably a far cry from their private-sector work.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/mueller-several-team-members-gave-up-million-dollar-jobs-to-work-on-special-counsel-investigation/2017/08/08/e11169da-7b78-11e7-83c7-5bd5460f0d7e_story.html?utm_term=.943a884bb9e2

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/special-counsel-submits-his-proposed-budget-but-wont-make-it-public/2017/07/07/a991f89a-6326-11e7-8adc-fea80e32bf47_story.html?tid=a_inl&utm_term=.5f0a03f81046

Neither do you, so we are even.

[Anonymous]

Which is worse - the DCUM crowd thinking there is a link of Russia and Trump through Manafort or the DCUM crowd pushing to suppress the unmasking story by Powers through Obama?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the DCUM crowd thinking there is a link of Russia and Trump through Manafort or the DCUM crowd pushing to suppress the unmasking story by Powers through Obama?

There are several Russia-Trump connections including Manafort: Prince, Flynn, Tillerson, Sessions, Trump Jr, its like the Yahtzee of Russia connections.
We don't know what the legality of the unmasking of Powers was or what, if anything was done with the information on those who were unmasked.

Unless or until there are allegations of actual impropriety, it can only be judged as a function of her job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the DCUM crowd thinking there is a link of Russia and Trump through Manafort or the DCUM crowd pushing to suppress the unmasking story by Powers through Obama?

The latter? This question seems too easy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the DCUM crowd thinking there is a link of Russia and Trump through Manafort or the DCUM crowd pushing to suppress the unmasking story by Powers through Obama?

The latter? This question seems too easy

Oh, I see - I read too quickly. Pushing to "suppress" the unmasking story. That's your concern.

You know, I guess I have a pretty good sense of where I stand in the world. And I feel comfortable saying that no matter how hard people "push to suppress" anything on an internet message board, that's not going to have much effect on the real world.

I also have a pretty good sense that you're an idiot? I don't know. Prove me wrong I guess.

[Anonymous]

What about the use of ARCG as cover?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the DCUM crowd thinking there is a link of Russia and Trump through Manafort or the DCUM crowd pushing to suppress the unmasking story by Powers through Obama?

The latter? This question seems too easy

Oh, I see - I read too quickly. Pushing to "suppress" the unmasking story. That's your concern.

You know, I guess I have a pretty good sense of where I stand in the world. And I feel comfortable saying that no matter how hard people "push to suppress" anything on an internet message board, that's not going to have much effect on the real world.

I also have a pretty good sense that you're an idiot? I don't know. Prove me wrong I guess.

Mantra of the left - If you can't attack the message, attack the messenger.

[Anonymous]

Meanwhile back on planet earth, Rice lied under oath, Powers unmasked 260 Americans last year and the Awan's are about to bring down the DNC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the DCUM crowd thinking there is a link of Russia and Trump through Manafort or the DCUM crowd pushing to suppress the unmasking story by Powers through Obama?

The latter? This question seems too easy

Oh, I see - I read too quickly. Pushing to "suppress" the unmasking story. That's your concern.

You know, I guess I have a pretty good sense of where I stand in the world. And I feel comfortable saying that no matter how hard people "push to suppress" anything on an internet message board, that's not going to have much effect on the real world.

I also have a pretty good sense that you're an idiot? I don't know. Prove me wrong I guess.

Mantra of the left - If you can't attack the message, attack the messenger.

No - more just, you guys shouted for eight years about the president not being American, you guys fell for some moronic conspiracy theory about how the basement of Comet Ping Pong was a secret pedo lair, and now this is your favorite conspiracy du jour. You're free, of course, not to consider yourself an idiot. But it's pretty compelling evidence. Not that you care about evidence!

It's funny that for all your obsessions, you patently refuse to look at the actual conspiracy that seems to be unfolding before your very eyes about Pee Pee Don and his merry band of traitors. But you can lead a horse to drink, but you can't make him pee on a bed with Russian prostitutes. I think that's how the saying goes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which is worse - the DCUM crowd thinking there is a link of Russia and Trump through Manafort or the DCUM crowd pushing to suppress the unmasking story by Powers through Obama?

There are several Russia-Trump connections including Manafort: Prince, Flynn, Tillerson, Sessions, Trump Jr, its like the Yahtzee of Russia connections.
We don't know what the legality of the unmasking of Powers was or what, if anything was done with the information on those who were unmasked.

Unless or until there are allegations of actual impropriety, it can only be judged as a function of her job.

This. You have to be living under a rock to deny that there are Russia connections to Trump, at the very least through his family (Kushner, too) and his campaign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile back on planet earth, Rice lied under oath, Powers unmasked 260 Americans last year and the Awan's are about to bring down the DNC.

LOL - it's the Anwan obsessive back for more!

Are you the same person who got kicked out of the library for being a conservative?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile back on planet earth, Rice lied under oath, Powers unmasked 260 Americans last year and the Awan's are about to bring down the DNC.

LOL - it's the Anwan obsessive back for more!

Are you the same person who got kicked out of the library for being a conservative?

Hey Anwan poster, I just heard someone uploaded video of Hillary Clinton shooting Vince Foster in the park. Hurry and download it before the NSA blocks it forever!