Does seem to support the idea that size make a difference. Great work Ross! |
+1; purchased 12 years ago; never thought we'd choose the public schools, and now feel silly for having thought that way. |
I wonder which school will join the high 90's club next year. |
Mckinley Tech rarely gets any love on this board but their scores were excellent: 93 math, 87 reading.
The Mckinley middle school's were really poor in the 30's. I wish they had the option of making it a test in middle school. |
But where are you seeing the results at the school level? I checked on DCPS website and what they say is that single school results will be published at the end of August.
Thanks for letting me know. |
For once Emma Brown gave us the scoop instead of vice versa
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/district-releases-school-by-school-dc-cas-results/2014/07/31/0e4862f2-18ec-11e4-9e3b-7f2f110c6265_story.html http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/local/2014-dc-cas-scores-by-school/1166/ |
Tipping my hat to Emma Brown. I follow her on Twitter and read her columns. She is all over this and other DC education topics. |
School by School http://osse.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/osse/publication/attachments/2014%20DC%20CAS%20Classification%20Results%20by%20Sector%20by%20School.pdf |
Does anybody know were they base the school classification? Do they base it on the overal index score or do they look at the percentage in each sub-category? I have seen some schools that are considered "Rising" but their overall index score and % in each sub category is less than some that are considered "Focus". Tubman's scores have declined but is classfied as "Rising". Seaton on the other hand which had positive change in the scores is classified as "Focus"? |
I don't think they've updated the school classifications yet to account for this year's scores. DCPS initially said they were going to release the individual school scores later this summer, but I guess those kind of were leaked yesterday. |
PP here. Ok, thanks. Hope that is the case. I assumed the list was updated since the heading was "Classfication - 2014". |
The whole region is growing so all school districts are growing. Choose the schools that fit your children best. If your child needs a high performing peer group then a school with low test scores isn't going to work, not in the long term. |
These are all categories deteremine by ESEA or other federal standards. Focus is different standard from the rest (which are linear in what they express). http://osse.dc.gov/service/dc-esea-accountability-classification-forms-amo-listings-flexibility-waiver-highlights |
The classifications are definitely updated. Bancroft fell 2 categories. I think it takes 3 years to get out of the Focus category, no matter how much the scores rise. |
I don't have time right now to do it, but would love to see the new list of lowest 40 - wondering if poor Cooke, the only school in ward 1 in last year's lowest 40, is joined by a few others or made it out.
Some of the declines were shocking. Tubman? Last year's secret hidden gem? I'm not the hugest fan of evaluating a school by scores, but it's definitely interesting to watch how it unfolds. The loonies are out in force in this thread! |