UVA deferral but UNC and Mich and UGA accepted

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Oy it isn't yield protection. UVA does not yield protect.

But it does take a lot of out-of-state students (a much higher percentage than comparable state schools). And it does feel a responsibility to limit how many students from Northern Virginia so that it can take some from the Rest of Virginia.

And it, of course, limits how many it takes from a particular high school in NOVA. These are not quotas or hard limits but they are a reality and it hurts TJ more than any other school, then probably the most high performing HS in Virginia (the McLeans and Langleys) and then of course the private high schools.

All of those schools have far more applicants who would likely be accepted if they were from Roanoke than those who actually get in.

In other words, it is not yield protection, it is that your peers are very strong. It feels unfair but that is the reality in a lot of schools.


Spot on. OP, why not just accept this common sense explanation? Why do you insist on making it into a conspiracy? Is your very accomplished kid so fragile that he or she can't handle one deferral?

DP. Don’t live in Virginia, didn’t apply to UVA, but kids getting in to HYP but not UVA seems like obvious yield protection to me.

In my opinion the burden is on the people saying that UVA doesn’t yield protect to show that UVA in-state has a lower admissions rate and a higher SAT range than HYP.

If you can’t show that, all this chatter about how UVA is actually, secretly, far more selective than any other school on earth is just nonsense.


You're mentioning completely outlier situations. Very few people get into HYP and are rejected from UVA. It is possible that someone with a very specific hook gets into a particular Ivy but does not get into UVA.

Look... how do we know that UVA does not yield protect? First of all, it wouldn't make sense. There are incredibly strong students who are accepted to Ivies but choose UVA because of the money. Second, my kids go to one of the strongest NOVA high schools. I have seen the scattergrams and the top right corner is a sea of green with an occasional red X. Schools that yield protect do not look like this. Period. They don't.

Absolutely no one has said that UVA has a lower admissions rate or a higher SAT range than HYP. That would be patently false.



The kid I know who got into Yale but not UVA was OOS and had no Yale-specific hooks. Super-strong, well-rounded student.

My sense is that UVA yield protects for OOS admissions, not in-state. They know that they have a good chance of yielding in-state students because of tuition. But OOS is much more challenging with costs not much lower than those of private schools.


I see the opposite from UVA at the 2 top DMV privates my kids attended and my 3rd kid (a senior) attends. UVA has a GPA line. If you're over it, you're in. If you're under it, you're not. OOS vs in-state does not really matter. The line is very high at both schools and is Ivy-level (even HYP level).



The magical line. And all you have to do is scribble some nonsense for an essay and get in.



But if you knew anything about UVA, you would then know there was no essay this year.


A [b]school of UVA's stature really should have essays.


They always do. The last two, however dealt in a round about way with two sensitive issues: 1) legacy, which was outlawed in the Commonwealth’s public institutions by the legislature. And 2) a prompt that would allow an applicant to talk about race. It was a thinly veiled attempt to get around racial preferences in light of the Supreme Court decision. The first had to go after the legislative decision … the second after it was discovered that UVA had discriminated in admissions and hiring in five situations, the most glaring being the medical school. There wasn’t time to replace the essay with one that would cover ED, EA and RD equitably. I imagine there will be essays again next year.


I think they should have essays again. There is such a limited set of things to make decisions on now. With test optional, you don't have standardized scores for many applicants. The vast majority of high schools no longer have class rank. Grade inflation is so high at many high schools that it makes it difficult to identify the real standouts.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:75th percentile SAT

UGA 1470
UVA 1530
Berkeley 1530



Berkeley hasn't accepted SAT scores for years at this point.


Plus UGA is test required and UVA enrolls 30% without tests. These numbers are inflated because the low scorers are not factored in at UVA (unlike UGA).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:75th percentile SAT

UGA 1470
UVA 1530
Berkeley 1530



Berkeley hasn't accepted SAT scores for years at this point.


yeah no way you can ever list a UC school when talking about SAT or ACT scores when they are Test Blind.



Maybe it's time to consider a UC school assuming average SAT is (much) lower if you are premed?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:NP here. since UGA is not binding, the kids I know who may go there are visiting again. They got into other state flagships more highly ranked than Georgia. Also, some don’t apply to UVA/UNC bc much different vibe from the 40k student schools.

It might not be what you would do but doesn’t make it wrong.


UGA is T20 public. Comparing rankings within a certain tier, such as T20 public, is ridiculous.


Come on. UGA is 46 out of national universities and UVA is 26. UVA is in an entirely different league than UGA. I agree that UGA is a great school. BTW, my DC toured and loved it. Was actually deferred from UGA and accepted at UNC and UVA (in state).


You’ve proven my point. You’re relying on an arbitrary ranking when in your case, UGA was more selective than UVa and UNC.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:75th percentile SAT

UGA 1470
UVA 1530
Berkeley 1530



Out of these UGA is the only one that requires the SAT. You can’t compare to TO.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:75th percentile SAT

UGA 1470
UVA 1530
Berkeley 1530



Out of these UGA is the only one that requires the SAT. You can’t compare to TO.


You are right. Someone already posted that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Make this make sense.

UVA hates VA privates is the explanation we are primarily hearing.

Why? Roll with it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Make this make sense.

UVA hates VA privates is the explanation we are primarily hearing.


No. UVA is going compared to others and they love international students.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:UVA isn’t really known for yield protection.
We are in state.
It does not make sense.
1540
top 20 percent of class.
Statistically, the odds of getting Michigan and UGA and UNC were much slimmer then getting UVA.


So.. it worked out the best!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:NP here. since UGA is not binding, the kids I know who may go there are visiting again. They got into other state flagships more highly ranked than Georgia. Also, some don’t apply to UVA/UNC bc much different vibe from the 40k student schools.

It might not be what you would do but doesn’t make it wrong.


UGA is T20 public. Comparing rankings within a certain tier, such as T20 public, is ridiculous.


Come on. UGA is 46 out of national universities and UVA is 26. UVA is in an entirely different league than UGA. I agree that UGA is a great school. BTW, my DC toured and loved it. Was actually deferred from UGA and accepted at UNC and UVA (in state).


Neither of them are top 25, so does it really matter?


What doesn't matter is your false reliance on on ranking source over another to come up with a random Top 25. None of that matters. Employers know the schools they recruit from and why they want those school's graduates and they are not basing it off some random USWR ranking for their decisions. I know this blows your mind but it's time to face reality here.


Says the person who responded to 46 and 26 rankings.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:NP here. since UGA is not binding, the kids I know who may go there are visiting again. They got into other state flagships more highly ranked than Georgia. Also, some don’t apply to UVA/UNC bc much different vibe from the 40k student schools.

It might not be what you would do but doesn’t make it wrong.


UGA is T20 public. Comparing rankings within a certain tier, such as T20 public, is ridiculous.


Come on. UGA is 46 out of national universities and UVA is 26. UVA is in an entirely different league than UGA. I agree that UGA is a great school. BTW, my DC toured and loved it. Was actually deferred from UGA and accepted at UNC and UVA (in state).


Neither of them are top 25, so does it really matter?


What doesn't matter is your false reliance on on ranking source over another to come up with a random Top 25. None of that matters. Employers know the schools they recruit from and why they want those school's graduates and they are not basing it off some random USWR ranking for their decisions. I know this blows your mind but it's time to face reality here.


Says the person who responded to 46 and 26 rankings.


So you admit the rankings are meaningless?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:UVA isn’t really known for yield protection.
We are in state.
It does not make sense.
1540
top 20 percent of class.
Statistically, the odds of getting Michigan and UGA and UNC were much slimmer then getting UVA.


UVA wants higher than 20% of class
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:NP here. since UGA is not binding, the kids I know who may go there are visiting again. They got into other state flagships more highly ranked than Georgia. Also, some don’t apply to UVA/UNC bc much different vibe from the 40k student schools.

It might not be what you would do but doesn’t make it wrong.


UGA is T20 public. Comparing rankings within a certain tier, such as T20 public, is ridiculous.


Come on. UGA is 46 out of national universities and UVA is 26. UVA is in an entirely different league than UGA. I agree that UGA is a great school. BTW, my DC toured and loved it. Was actually deferred from UGA and accepted at UNC and UVA (in state).


Neither of them are top 25, so does it really matter?


What doesn't matter is your false reliance on on ranking source over another to come up with a random Top 25. None of that matters. Employers know the schools they recruit from and why they want those school's graduates and they are not basing it off some random USWR ranking for their decisions. I know this blows your mind but it's time to face reality here.


Says the person who responded to 46 and 26 rankings.


So you admit the rankings are meaningless?


Yes after the top 20…..😁
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Yes, it was ED.
Deferral.


Maybe your kid just didn't have the institutional fit they were looking for? Congrats on all of their other incredibly competitive acceptances. It sounds like your kid has some great options!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:NP here. since UGA is not binding, the kids I know who may go there are visiting again. They got into other state flagships more highly ranked than Georgia. Also, some don’t apply to UVA/UNC bc much different vibe from the 40k student schools.

It might not be what you would do but doesn’t make it wrong.


UGA is T20 public. Comparing rankings within a certain tier, such as T20 public, is ridiculous.


Come on. UGA is 46 out of national universities and UVA is 26. UVA is in an entirely different league than UGA. I agree that UGA is a great school. BTW, my DC toured and loved it. Was actually deferred from UGA and accepted at UNC and UVA (in state).


Neither of them are top 25, so does it really matter?


What doesn't matter is your false reliance on on ranking source over another to come up with a random Top 25. None of that matters. Employers know the schools they recruit from and why they want those school's graduates and they are not basing it off some random USWR ranking for their decisions. I know this blows your mind but it's time to face reality here.


Says the person who responded to 46 and 26 rankings.


So you admit the rankings are meaningless?


Yes after the top 20…..😁


After Top 10
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: