Why the push for accelerated math?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Numbers can be difficult for some

Particularly MAGAs…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In FCPS, around 10% take Algebra 1 in 7th, around 40 kids take it in 6th, and around 1-3 kids take it before 6th. Those numbers seem appropriate. FCPS already strongly gatekeeps the paths leading to Algebra before 7th. There isn’t a problem with math acceleration in FCPS. They’re pretty spot on.

That sounds fine to me. Kids who don't accelerate, the majority, take Calculus senior year. Perfectly appropriate.

Taking calculus senior year is accelerating one year.

That's your opinion. Expectation for most college bound students is calculus by senior year. STEM interested kids should go further. Kids with no interest in college don't need it. There is no one track for everyone where you can deem what is accelerated and by how much. Your opinion doesn't matter.

LOL. It’s not an “opinion”. That’s just how the math pathways work. Calculus is a college-level subject.

The expectation for college-bound kids is to accelerate by at least one year.

LoL. About 300,000 high school students take AP Calculus exam each year. That is normal, not acceleration!

Equity minimalists are foolishly trying to convince students not to learn calculus as part of their normal and non-accelerated pace of learning, when hundreds of thousands are already learning it successfully.

Liar.

No one here is trying to convince kids to not take calculus.

Calculus is an accelerated path. It’s not even debatable even though idiotic RWNJ trolls want to debate it.

Calculus in high school is not accelerated according to fcps or any other high school.

You seem vocabulary challenged, repeating the same few words: liar, rwnj, wealthy feeders, cheating, test buying, prep, question bank, etc., and your obsession of all - Curie!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In FCPS, around 10% take Algebra 1 in 7th, around 40 kids take it in 6th, and around 1-3 kids take it before 6th. Those numbers seem appropriate. FCPS already strongly gatekeeps the paths leading to Algebra before 7th. There isn’t a problem with math acceleration in FCPS. They’re pretty spot on.

That sounds fine to me. Kids who don't accelerate, the majority, take Calculus senior year. Perfectly appropriate.

Taking calculus senior year is accelerating one year.

That's your opinion. Expectation for most college bound students is calculus by senior year. STEM interested kids should go further. Kids with no interest in college don't need it. There is no one track for everyone where you can deem what is accelerated and by how much. Your opinion doesn't matter.

LOL. It’s not an “opinion”. That’s just how the math pathways work. Calculus is a college-level subject.

The expectation for college-bound kids is to accelerate by at least one year.

LoL. About 300,000 high school students take AP Calculus exam each year. That is normal, not acceleration!

Equity minimalists are foolishly trying to convince students not to learn calculus as part of their normal and non-accelerated pace of learning, when hundreds of thousands are already learning it successfully.

Liar.

No one here is trying to convince kids to not take calculus.

Calculus is an accelerated path. It’s not even debatable even though idiotic RWNJ trolls want to debate it.

Calculus in high school is not accelerated according to fcps or any other high school.

You seem vocabulary challenged, repeating the same few words: liar, rwnj, wealthy feeders, cheating, test buying, prep, question bank, etc., and your obsession of all - Curie!

You are dumb AF. Typical for RWNJ trash.

[Anonymous]

For the dumb ass RWNJ troll who doesn’t know what “accelerated” means:

Pg 24 https://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/9UGLF242CE53/$file/Math%20Study%20-%20Final%20Report%20v14%20lzh.pdf

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For the dumb ass RWNJ troll who doesn’t know what “accelerated” means:

Pg 24 https://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/9UGLF242CE53/$file/Math%20Study%20-%20Final%20Report%20v14%20lzh.pdf

Typical woke findings from 2014. Rejected by board.

AP Calculus had been normal progression for many years now. Not considered accelerated, just normal.

https://www.fcps.edu/academics/graduation-requirements-and-course-planning/high-school-course-sequencing/mathematics

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In FCPS, around 10% take Algebra 1 in 7th, around 40 kids take it in 6th, and around 1-3 kids take it before 6th. Those numbers seem appropriate. FCPS already strongly gatekeeps the paths leading to Algebra before 7th. There isn’t a problem with math acceleration in FCPS. They’re pretty spot on.

That sounds fine to me. Kids who don't accelerate, the majority, take Calculus senior year. Perfectly appropriate.

Taking calculus senior year is accelerating one year.

That's your opinion. Expectation for most college bound students is calculus by senior year. STEM interested kids should go further. Kids with no interest in college don't need it. There is no one track for everyone where you can deem what is accelerated and by how much. Your opinion doesn't matter.

LOL. It’s not an “opinion”. That’s just how the math pathways work. Calculus is a college-level subject.

The expectation for college-bound kids is to accelerate by at least one year.

Oh, you're one of those Virginia Math Pathways Initiative (VMPI) people. I thought we managed to thoroughly stomp you all out. Give it up. You can't define Calculus as "accelerated" when the goal of most FCPS students is college. It is just the expected track for most people. Quit trying to stunt the growth and education of other peoples' kids.

Here are the K-12 math standards for Virginia.
https://www.doe.virginia.gov/teaching-learning-assessment/instruction/mathematics/standards-of-learning-for-mathematics

Where is calculus?

According to the idiotic definition you are trying to apply to "accelerated", anything not required for the minimum possible standard for graduation is accelerated. Art, music, band past elementary school - all accelerated. Guess we need to raise the bar for who gets to take those. Want to take computer science? prove you deserve it first I guess. Hope none of those kids want to play sports outside of the minimum years of PE required to graduate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In FCPS, around 10% take Algebra 1 in 7th, around 40 kids take it in 6th, and around 1-3 kids take it before 6th. Those numbers seem appropriate. FCPS already strongly gatekeeps the paths leading to Algebra before 7th. There isn’t a problem with math acceleration in FCPS. They’re pretty spot on.

That sounds fine to me. Kids who don't accelerate, the majority, take Calculus senior year. Perfectly appropriate.

Taking calculus senior year is accelerating one year.

That's your opinion. Expectation for most college bound students is calculus by senior year. STEM interested kids should go further. Kids with no interest in college don't need it. There is no one track for everyone where you can deem what is accelerated and by how much. Your opinion doesn't matter.

LOL. It’s not an “opinion”. That’s just how the math pathways work. Calculus is a college-level subject.

The expectation for college-bound kids is to accelerate by at least one year.

Oh, you're one of those Virginia Math Pathways Initiative (VMPI) people. I thought we managed to thoroughly stomp you all out. Give it up. You can't define Calculus as "accelerated" when the goal of most FCPS students is college. It is just the expected track for most people. Quit trying to stunt the growth and education of other peoples' kids.

Here are the K-12 math standards for Virginia.
https://www.doe.virginia.gov/teaching-learning-assessment/instruction/mathematics/standards-of-learning-for-mathematics

Where is calculus?

According to the idiotic definition you are trying to apply to "accelerated", anything not required for the minimum possible standard for graduation is accelerated. Art, music, band past elementary school - all accelerated. Guess we need to raise the bar for who gets to take those. Want to take computer science? prove you deserve it first I guess. Hope none of those kids want to play sports outside of the minimum years of PE required to graduate.

None of those skill areas influence admission into AAP or TJ nearly as much as math does. Learning math requires sustained effort and discipline, and since not everyone is willing to put in that kind of hard work, woke idiots have started pushing the idea that if advanced math—such as calculus—is discouraged from high school, it will reduce the incentive to pursue above-average math in earlier grades. The thinking is that by capping math opportunities at the high school level, math equity can be retroactively achieved in elementary and middle school. This mindset closely mirrors the failed VMPI, which sought to hold all students to a uniform, lower math standard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the dumb ass RWNJ troll who doesn’t know what “accelerated” means:

Pg 24 https://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/9UGLF242CE53/$file/Math%20Study%20-%20Final%20Report%20v14%20lzh.pdf

Typical woke findings from 2014. Rejected by board.

AP Calculus had been normal progression for many years now. Not considered accelerated, just normal.

https://www.fcps.edu/academics/graduation-requirements-and-course-planning/high-school-course-sequencing/mathematics

You are the most lame troll ever.

Calculus in HS is accelerated. Period. It's not even up for debate.

It's common for bright kids to accelerate by at least one year but it's still acceleration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:For the dumb ass RWNJ troll who doesn’t know what “accelerated” means:

Pg 24 https://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/9UGLF242CE53/$file/Math%20Study%20-%20Final%20Report%20v14%20lzh.pdf

For the dumb shts in the back:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the dumb ass RWNJ troll who doesn’t know what “accelerated” means:

Pg 24 https://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/9UGLF242CE53/$file/Math%20Study%20-%20Final%20Report%20v14%20lzh.pdf

For the dumb shts in the back:

This is exactly the kind of woke nonsense that got Superintendent Karen Garza pushed out. Her reports were so far left, even liberals considered them extreme.

[Anonymous]

You are an idiot. That is just basic terminology in education.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the dumb ass RWNJ troll who doesn’t know what “accelerated” means:

Pg 24 https://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/9UGLF242CE53/$file/Math%20Study%20-%20Final%20Report%20v14%20lzh.pdf

For the dumb shts in the back:

This is exactly the kind of woke nonsense that got Superintendent Karen Garza pushed out. Her reports were so far left, even liberals considered them extreme.

I graduated HS in a purple area of a red state in the early 2000s and this was our exact math progression. Average students did pre-calc/trig as HS seniors and then college calculus as freshmen if their majors required it. Advanced students did Algebra 1 in 8th and AP Calc as seniors. There was no formal path more accelerated than that, but we always had a few (less than 10) students who either came from private or did a bunch of outside enrichment so they could do AP Calc as juniors, and then additional college level math at the local college as seniors.

Point is, this has been THE math progression for a few generations. Look at the graduation requirements, HS Calc is not on there. Now there is a big push in education/a trend to get all kids into Calculus as HS seniors, but it’s still considered acceleration.

[Anonymous]

Calculus has been a standard part of the high school curriculum for decades, with a formalized AP Math course introduced in 1955. AP Calculus AB followed in 1969, created alongside AP Calculus BC to replace the original, comprehensive AP Math exam with two distinct calculus tracks.

For centuries, calculus was never labeled as “accelerated”—it was simply part of the expected progression for advanced math students in high school. The idea of calling it accelerated only emerged in the past two decades, driven by a push for “math equity” from activist circles, however it has been largely rejected as excessively ideological and lowering standards. But, that doesn’t mean the woke stop trying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Calculus has been a standard part of the high school curriculum for decades, with a formalized AP Math course introduced in 1955. AP Calculus AB followed in 1969, created alongside AP Calculus BC to replace the original, comprehensive AP Math exam with two distinct calculus tracks.

For centuries, calculus was never labeled as “accelerated”—it was simply part of the expected progression for advanced math students in high school. The idea of calling it accelerated only emerged in the past two decades, driven by a push for “math equity” from activist circles, however it has been largely rejected as excessively ideological and lowering standards. But, that doesn’t mean the woke stop trying.

You are full of sht. It was “accelerated” 35 years ago when I took it in HS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Calculus has been a standard part of the high school curriculum for decades, with a formalized AP Math course introduced in 1955. AP Calculus AB followed in 1969, created alongside AP Calculus BC to replace the original, comprehensive AP Math exam with two distinct calculus tracks.

For centuries, calculus was never labeled as “accelerated”—it was simply part of the expected progression for advanced math students in high school. The idea of calling it accelerated only emerged in the past two decades, driven by a push for “math equity” from activist circles, however it has been largely rejected as excessively ideological and lowering standards. But, that doesn’t mean the woke stop trying.

You are full of sht. It was “accelerated” 35 years ago when I took it in HS.

When the woke exhaust their tiny arsenal of fed buzzwords, they fall back on their favorite four-letter vocabulary—how ironic!