Trump is indeed an anomaly. The GOP leadership and their wealthy donors were pooping in their pants in 2016 when Trump took the primary lead as much as the Dem leadership and their wealthy donors were pooping in their pants when Bernie Sanders was threatening HRC. Trump won in 2016 while running against the party money. He then became a part of the swamp and won in 2024 while running with the party money. |
Yeah, cause you were so scared of it. Cry babies. |
Trump is a symptom of a failing country, as is the maga movement. It’s a shame really, so much good work over the centuries down the toilet. I don’t know what it’s going to take for the country to right itself. |
The Republican establishment had several opportunities to end Trump and they chose capitulation every time. They own this. Twenty Republican Senators would have convicted in the second impeachment if the party establishment would have backed them. They all chickened out as they always do. |
“Ending Trump”‘isn’t the same thing as “producing Trump” which was the original claim that was contested. The party itself was not promoting Trump as the lead candidate. That’s just a fact. Trump succeeded because of the power of primary voters in spite of the Republican establishment. |
Keep promoting DEI and see how democrats do in 2028. Please! |
Keep telling your fragile self that. |
Oh, yeah. MAGA doesn't get triggered... You make it so easy. LOL And yes, I am married to an actual man who is AMERICAN as opposed to your false idol with his foreign-born, Bond villainess "wife". |
Bless your heart, OP. |
How are you enjoying the DC mom coven bubble these days. It only gets worse from here. Enjoy the inauguration of #47 tomorrow afternoon. |
DP. Yes, actually, I am scared of DEI — when people are hired for reasons other than merit, it causes a crisis of incompetence that threatens people’s safety. |
like all of Trump's cabinet members, yes. |
That's the part you people keep getting wrong and being dishonest about. You falsely assume the DEI candidate has no merit and was ONLY hired on the basis of race etc, when the reality of it is that given two candidates of EQUAL merit, you pick the societally marginalized or underrepresented one. |
It’s a start of a conversation. It’s messy. But it’s needed. |
| I think OP makes some great points and all the leftists should seriously consider them. |