WSJ Report: Biden out of it from day one

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts on today's Wall Street Journal article that Biden has been hand-held since the beginning of his presidency in 2021, with efforts to conceal his declining state in place for all four years? And the unelected staffers who have served as "Biden Whisperers" (their term), who have basically been running the administration, protecting him from the press?

Yes, we were lied to.

Fake news. President Biden will go down as one of the best presidents in modern history. Throughout his term many of those who have actually worked with President Biden--not anonymous "sources"--have attested to how sharp and cogent he was; one of the most demanding presidents they've ever worked with or for, to be sure. He would have won again in 2024 if he weren't betrayed by foolish donors who panicked after one underwhelming debate performance.

He was obviously sundowning

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This entire thread is just whataboutism.

+1
Report every single whatabout post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts on today's Wall Street Journal article that Biden has been hand-held since the beginning of his presidency in 2021, with efforts to conceal his declining state in place for all four years? And the unelected staffers who have served as "Biden Whisperers" (their term), who have basically been running the administration, protecting him from the press?

Yes, we were lied to.

So says the foreign owned anti American WSJ.

Here, sweetie. Here's a far-left source stating exactly the same thing. Maybe that will help this obvious news go down better?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/damning-report-describes-how-aides-shielded-declining-joe-biden-from-scrutiny/
DP

All that does is summarize the WSJ article. There’s no independent reporting confirming it.

Bless your heart.

I’m plenty blessed, thanks. Pointing the Daily Beast article out does nothing to further your argument.

The delusion is strong with this one ^^

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/11/08/democrats-lost-credibility-harris-biden/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts on today's Wall Street Journal article that Biden has been hand-held since the beginning of his presidency in 2021, with efforts to conceal his declining state in place for all four years? And the unelected staffers who have served as "Biden Whisperers" (their term), who have basically been running the administration, protecting him from the press?

Yes, we were lied to.

So says the foreign owned anti American WSJ.

Here, sweetie. Here's a far-left source stating exactly the same thing. Maybe that will help this obvious news go down better?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/damning-report-describes-how-aides-shielded-declining-joe-biden-from-scrutiny/
DP

All that does is summarize the WSJ article. There’s no independent reporting confirming it.

Do you not understand that the WSJ article includes independent reporting, including in the record quotes from people?

+1
The PP is laughable. She thinks if she simply denies a well-sourced, extremely reputable, world-class newspaper, people will actually believe her. It's so pathetically funny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts on today's Wall Street Journal article that Biden has been hand-held since the beginning of his presidency in 2021, with efforts to conceal his declining state in place for all four years? And the unelected staffers who have served as "Biden Whisperers" (their term), who have basically been running the administration, protecting him from the press?

Yes, we were lied to.

So says the foreign owned anti American WSJ.

Here, sweetie. Here's a far-left source stating exactly the same thing. Maybe that will help this obvious news go down better?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/damning-report-describes-how-aides-shielded-declining-joe-biden-from-scrutiny/
DP

All that does is summarize the WSJ article. There’s no independent reporting confirming it.

Do you not understand that the WSJ article includes independent reporting, including in the record quotes from people?

The WSJ interviewed 50 people for the article.

So you all believe anonymous sources now? Interesting.

DP. Well, you certainly always do. So climb on down from your high horse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts on today's Wall Street Journal article that Biden has been hand-held since the beginning of his presidency in 2021, with efforts to conceal his declining state in place for all four years? And the unelected staffers who have served as "Biden Whisperers" (their term), who have basically been running the administration, protecting him from the press?

Yes, we were lied to.

So says the foreign owned anti American WSJ.

Here, sweetie. Here's a far-left source stating exactly the same thing. Maybe that will help this obvious news go down better?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/damning-report-describes-how-aides-shielded-declining-joe-biden-from-scrutiny/
DP

All that does is summarize the WSJ article. There’s no independent reporting confirming it.

Do you not understand that the WSJ article includes independent reporting, including in the record quotes from people?

The WSJ interviewed 50 people for the article.

Who the drunks over at Fox News? This just shows how far the WSJ has fallen under Murdoch control. Every article just right wing propaganda.

You poor, poor thing.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Lol, yep. These are the two elderly clowns 155 million fools voted for in 2020. Stupid not fixed yet!

Democrats weren't given a choice. And there was no viable third party candidate. The moment unpopular, geriatric, dementia-ridden, 82 year old Joe Biden decided to run for reelection was the moment Trump's victory was assured. And no last minute coronation of equally unpopular Kamala Harris was going to save it. Joe Biden and his enablers were a disaster for America. And Trump is the consequence of the profound stupidity and arrogance of the Democratic establishment.

Agree 150%. The 80 million people that thought it was wise to vote for Biden in 2020 are just as much on the hook for this Trump second term debacle as the idiot Trump voters are.

But it was Biden's turn!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m one of the few who knew it from the beginning. I can see the big picture like the vast majority can’t. I also avoided the ridiculous mRNA shot that they constantly oversold, changed the goalposts and everybody still got covid. I never got covid. I constantly end up correct about everything. It’s a blessing and a curse. It’s tough watching the public being fooled.

So many narcissists in this world.

After constantly doubting myself being highly aware of reality being the opposite of the consensus and ending up right about everything… I’ve become very sure of my instincts

DP. I would agree with this, and so would many other Americans. So many instances of gaslighting during the Biden administration.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. The change in him from the beginning of his presidency until the end of his term was extreme. He was functioning fine when elected. Not so after four years. That’s why who the president chooses to run government agencies and appoint to positions especially his cabinet is so important. If they aren’t trustworthy the country could be in danger.

Trump is right there in age and doesn’t seem that sharp or with it. It’s a little concerning what will happen if he starts to rapidly decline.

Yes, the presidency ages everyone fast and he had to go through the harassment of his last living child, too. The GOP wanted this result, in fact, I dare say they hoped for an even worse outcome for him. They’re cruel and twisted.

Joe’s term was overall excellent and he’s been a dutiful public servant most of his life. Shame on our country for piling on him for being human.

What on earth did I just read? The rantings of a crazy person...

[Anonymous]

Information inconvenient to Democrats nis labeled misinformation and a conspiracy theory until there is permission given to the media by Democrats to run the story.

Chris Cillizza said he didn't ask about Biden's decline because White House staffers would get mad at him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t know. The change in him from the beginning of his presidency until the end of his term was extreme. He was functioning fine when elected. Not so after four years. That’s why who the president chooses to run government agencies and appoint to positions especially his cabinet is so important. If they aren’t trustworthy the country could be in danger.

Trump is right there in age and doesn’t seem that sharp or with it. It’s a little concerning what will happen if he starts to rapidly decline.

Yes, the presidency ages everyone fast and he had to go through the harassment of his last living child, too. The GOP wanted this result, in fact, I dare say they hoped for an even worse outcome for him. They’re cruel and twisted.

Joe’s term was overall excellent and he’s been a dutiful public servant most of his life. Shame on our country for piling on him for being human.

You believe that the right caused Joe's mental decline?.

I believe that stress accelerates aging.

I believe the presidency is stressful and aging.

I believe that having your lone surviving child who struggles with addiction being targeted and harassed is stressful.

I believe the GOP knows this too, and their harassment of Hunter was merely to weaken Joe politically, physically, and mentally. Most of the GOP are nothing if not evil, self-serving strategists, yes.

I believe you are in need of therapy.
DP

[Anonymous]

Biden has gotten a lot done. Way more than Trump.


I am glad to have voted for him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Information inconvenient to Democrats nis labeled misinformation and a conspiracy theory until there is permission given to the media by Democrats to run the story.

Chris Cillizza said he didn't ask about Biden's decline because White House staffers would get mad at him.

That's top shelf journalism right there, Chris!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biden has gotten a lot done. Way more than Trump.


I am glad to have voted for him.

Yes, thanks for voting for the senile, inept elderly person that gifted Trump a second term. You must be so proud of yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Lol, yep. These are the two elderly clowns 155 million fools voted for in 2020. Stupid not fixed yet!

Democrats weren't given a choice. And there was no viable third party candidate. The moment unpopular, geriatric, dementia-ridden, 82 year old Joe Biden decided to run for reelection was the moment Trump's victory was assured. And no last minute coronation of equally unpopular Kamala Harris was going to save it. Joe Biden and his enablers were a disaster for America. And Trump is the consequence of the profound stupidity and arrogance of the Democratic establishment.

Agree 150%. The 80 million people that thought it was wise to vote for Biden in 2020 are just as much on the hook for this Trump second term debacle as the idiot Trump voters are.

But it was Biden's turn!

That's not how it works