If Wisconsin has a good state flagship, why can’t New Jersey or New York?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cornell vs Wisconsin that is a joke.

Wisconsin in the early 2000s became the it school for NE parents because their darlings couldn't cut it at state flagships or Ivies.

Wisconsin grew into a good business school from that with mommy and daddy in Chicago and NY networking for them.

Is Wisconsin worth it now OOS hell no not with the Trump administration destroying the economy. Financial stupidity if your kid gets into a state flagship as well.

Is it a fun school yes, are the kids smart yep are they as smart as Cornell kids not in any reality. Huge difference in job offers from WI vs Cornell.

You are living in the past. Wisconsin is hot among high schoolers. Cornell is the exact opposite. As for job opportunities, let the results speak for themself. We actively recruit Wisconsin grads.

What cheesehead planet are you living on? Here's some actual data. No one is picking U. Wisconsin over Cornell, unless they live in Wisconsin and it would save their parents a bundle on tuition.
Cornell acceptance rate: 7.36%
U. Wisconsin Madison rate: 43%

Out of state acceptance rates are roughly equivalent. That also isn’t a metric that means much. Compare the quality of graduates instead.

Out of state U Wisconsin Madison is 18%. On no cheesehead planet does that approach the 7% Cornell acceptance rate. And feel sure to provide data showing the quality of UW graduates vs. Cornell. But remember, most college graduates know that your opinion is not the same as data.

Can you provide any data that there is a meaningful difference in graduates? My firm has blacklisted Cornell from our recruitment program after multiple bad hires but is actively recruiting from Wisconsin. The job market is what matters.

Cool story bro. What's the name of your firm? Was the Cornell behavior so egregious that they made their unhappiness publicly known, or do we just need to take your anonymous word.

Talk to recruiters and look at job placement data.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cornell vs Wisconsin that is a joke.

Wisconsin in the early 2000s became the it school for NE parents because their darlings couldn't cut it at state flagships or Ivies.

Wisconsin grew into a good business school from that with mommy and daddy in Chicago and NY networking for them.

Is Wisconsin worth it now OOS hell no not with the Trump administration destroying the economy. Financial stupidity if your kid gets into a state flagship as well.

Is it a fun school yes, are the kids smart yep are they as smart as Cornell kids not in any reality. Huge difference in job offers from WI vs Cornell.

You are living in the past. Wisconsin is hot among high schoolers. Cornell is the exact opposite. As for job opportunities, let the results speak for themself. We actively recruit Wisconsin grads.

What cheesehead planet are you living on? Here's some actual data. No one is picking U. Wisconsin over Cornell, unless they live in Wisconsin and it would save their parents a bundle on tuition.
Cornell acceptance rate: 7.36%
U. Wisconsin Madison rate: 43%

Out of state acceptance rates are roughly equivalent. That also isn’t a metric that means much. Compare the quality of graduates instead.

Out of state U Wisconsin Madison is 18%. On no cheesehead planet does that approach the 7% Cornell acceptance rate. And feel sure to provide data showing the quality of UW graduates vs. Cornell. But remember, most college graduates know that your opinion is not the same as data.

Can you provide any data that there is a meaningful difference in graduates? My firm has blacklisted Cornell from our recruitment program after multiple bad hires but is actively recruiting from Wisconsin. The job market is what matters.

Your anecdote does not equal to the job market. I can't believe I need to explain that to an adult, presumably one with a degree. All you have is an opinion...and not a particularly educated one at that. What is obvious is that it's a lot harder to get into Cornell than UW.

You are the one who has provided nothing but opinion. My firm is rather large and has extensive hiring experience with college graduates.

Out of state acceptance into Cornell is not harder. You fail to understand what an acceptance rate means. It often just means more applications from under qualified students, such as international students or students looking for financial aid.

It is getting funny at how biased you are in this comparison while not providing any actual arguments.

What evidence do you have that Cornell with its 7% acceptance rate is getting underqualified applicants while University of Wisconsin with its 43% acceptance rate (18% out of state) is getting all academic stars?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cornell vs Wisconsin that is a joke.

Wisconsin in the early 2000s became the it school for NE parents because their darlings couldn't cut it at state flagships or Ivies.

Wisconsin grew into a good business school from that with mommy and daddy in Chicago and NY networking for them.

Is Wisconsin worth it now OOS hell no not with the Trump administration destroying the economy. Financial stupidity if your kid gets into a state flagship as well.

Is it a fun school yes, are the kids smart yep are they as smart as Cornell kids not in any reality. Huge difference in job offers from WI vs Cornell.

You are living in the past. Wisconsin is hot among high schoolers. Cornell is the exact opposite. As for job opportunities, let the results speak for themself. We actively recruit Wisconsin grads.

What cheesehead planet are you living on? Here's some actual data. No one is picking U. Wisconsin over Cornell, unless they live in Wisconsin and it would save their parents a bundle on tuition.
Cornell acceptance rate: 7.36%
U. Wisconsin Madison rate: 43%

Out of state acceptance rates are roughly equivalent. That also isn’t a metric that means much. Compare the quality of graduates instead.

Out of state U Wisconsin Madison is 18%. On no cheesehead planet does that approach the 7% Cornell acceptance rate. And feel sure to provide data showing the quality of UW graduates vs. Cornell. But remember, most college graduates know that your opinion is not the same as data.

Can you provide any data that there is a meaningful difference in graduates? My firm has blacklisted Cornell from our recruitment program after multiple bad hires but is actively recruiting from Wisconsin. The job market is what matters.

Your anecdote does not equal to the job market. I can't believe I need to explain that to an adult, presumably one with a degree. All you have is an opinion...and not a particularly educated one at that. What is obvious is that it's a lot harder to get into Cornell than UW.

You are the one who has provided nothing but opinion. My firm is rather large and has extensive hiring experience with college graduates.

Out of state acceptance into Cornell is not harder. You fail to understand what an acceptance rate means. It often just means more applications from under qualified students, such as international students or students looking for financial aid.

It is getting funny at how biased you are in this comparison while not providing any actual arguments.

What evidence do you have that Cornell with its 7% acceptance rate is getting underqualified applicants while University of Wisconsin with its 43% acceptance rate (18% out of state) is getting all academic stars?

Give it a rest and reread the prior posts. Job placement is what matters, especially into competitive fields with compensation to match.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cornell vs Wisconsin that is a joke.

Wisconsin in the early 2000s became the it school for NE parents because their darlings couldn't cut it at state flagships or Ivies.

Wisconsin grew into a good business school from that with mommy and daddy in Chicago and NY networking for them.

Is Wisconsin worth it now OOS hell no not with the Trump administration destroying the economy. Financial stupidity if your kid gets into a state flagship as well.

Is it a fun school yes, are the kids smart yep are they as smart as Cornell kids not in any reality. Huge difference in job offers from WI vs Cornell.

You are living in the past. Wisconsin is hot among high schoolers. Cornell is the exact opposite. As for job opportunities, let the results speak for themself. We actively recruit Wisconsin grads.

What cheesehead planet are you living on? Here's some actual data. No one is picking U. Wisconsin over Cornell, unless they live in Wisconsin and it would save their parents a bundle on tuition.
Cornell acceptance rate: 7.36%
U. Wisconsin Madison rate: 43%

Out of state acceptance rates are roughly equivalent. That also isn’t a metric that means much. Compare the quality of graduates instead.

Out of state U Wisconsin Madison is 18%. On no cheesehead planet does that approach the 7% Cornell acceptance rate. And feel sure to provide data showing the quality of UW graduates vs. Cornell. But remember, most college graduates know that your opinion is not the same as data.

Can you provide any data that there is a meaningful difference in graduates? My firm has blacklisted Cornell from our recruitment program after multiple bad hires but is actively recruiting from Wisconsin. The job market is what matters.

Your anecdote does not equal to the job market. I can't believe I need to explain that to an adult, presumably one with a degree. All you have is an opinion...and not a particularly educated one at that. What is obvious is that it's a lot harder to get into Cornell than UW.

You are the one who has provided nothing but opinion. My firm is rather large and has extensive hiring experience with college graduates.

Out of state acceptance into Cornell is not harder. You fail to understand what an acceptance rate means. It often just means more applications from under qualified students, such as international students or students looking for financial aid.

It is getting funny at how biased you are in this comparison while not providing any actual arguments.

What evidence do you have that Cornell with its 7% acceptance rate is getting underqualified applicants while University of Wisconsin with its 43% acceptance rate (18% out of state) is getting all academic stars?

Give it a rest and reread the prior posts. Job placement is what matters, especially into competitive fields with compensation to match.

Your prior posts are nonsensical...except to people who believe that 7% is equal to 18%. Show us the numbers that prove that U Wisconsin has the stellar job placement that exceeds Cornell, or you're just a cheesehead with a sad lack of analytical skills.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cornell vs Wisconsin that is a joke.

Wisconsin in the early 2000s became the it school for NE parents because their darlings couldn't cut it at state flagships or Ivies.

Wisconsin grew into a good business school from that with mommy and daddy in Chicago and NY networking for them.

Is Wisconsin worth it now OOS hell no not with the Trump administration destroying the economy. Financial stupidity if your kid gets into a state flagship as well.

Is it a fun school yes, are the kids smart yep are they as smart as Cornell kids not in any reality. Huge difference in job offers from WI vs Cornell.

You are living in the past. Wisconsin is hot among high schoolers. Cornell is the exact opposite. As for job opportunities, let the results speak for themself. We actively recruit Wisconsin grads.

What cheesehead planet are you living on? Here's some actual data. No one is picking U. Wisconsin over Cornell, unless they live in Wisconsin and it would save their parents a bundle on tuition.
Cornell acceptance rate: 7.36%
U. Wisconsin Madison rate: 43%

Out of state acceptance rates are roughly equivalent. That also isn’t a metric that means much. Compare the quality of graduates instead.

Out of state U Wisconsin Madison is 18%. On no cheesehead planet does that approach the 7% Cornell acceptance rate. And feel sure to provide data showing the quality of UW graduates vs. Cornell. But remember, most college graduates know that your opinion is not the same as data.

Can you provide any data that there is a meaningful difference in graduates? My firm has blacklisted Cornell from our recruitment program after multiple bad hires but is actively recruiting from Wisconsin. The job market is what matters.

Your anecdote does not equal to the job market. I can't believe I need to explain that to an adult, presumably one with a degree. All you have is an opinion...and not a particularly educated one at that. What is obvious is that it's a lot harder to get into Cornell than UW.

You are the one who has provided nothing but opinion. My firm is rather large and has extensive hiring experience with college graduates.

Out of state acceptance into Cornell is not harder. You fail to understand what an acceptance rate means. It often just means more applications from under qualified students, such as international students or students looking for financial aid.

It is getting funny at how biased you are in this comparison while not providing any actual arguments.

What evidence do you have that Cornell with its 7% acceptance rate is getting underqualified applicants while University of Wisconsin with its 43% acceptance rate (18% out of state) is getting all academic stars?

Give it a rest and reread the prior posts. Job placement is what matters, especially into competitive fields with compensation to match.

Your prior posts are nonsensical...except to people who believe that 7% is equal to 18%. Show us the numbers that prove that U Wisconsin has the stellar job placement that exceeds Cornell, or you're just a cheesehead with a sad lack of analytical skills.

Everybody knows that financial aid programs and international outreach inflate admissions rates, which are a misused and misunderstood metric.

Your insults reflect your lack of intelligence. Nobody at this point is taking you seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cornell vs Wisconsin that is a joke.

Wisconsin in the early 2000s became the it school for NE parents because their darlings couldn't cut it at state flagships or Ivies.

Wisconsin grew into a good business school from that with mommy and daddy in Chicago and NY networking for them.

Is Wisconsin worth it now OOS hell no not with the Trump administration destroying the economy. Financial stupidity if your kid gets into a state flagship as well.

Is it a fun school yes, are the kids smart yep are they as smart as Cornell kids not in any reality. Huge difference in job offers from WI vs Cornell.

You are living in the past. Wisconsin is hot among high schoolers. Cornell is the exact opposite. As for job opportunities, let the results speak for themself. We actively recruit Wisconsin grads.

What cheesehead planet are you living on? Here's some actual data. No one is picking U. Wisconsin over Cornell, unless they live in Wisconsin and it would save their parents a bundle on tuition.
Cornell acceptance rate: 7.36%
U. Wisconsin Madison rate: 43%

Out of state acceptance rates are roughly equivalent. That also isn’t a metric that means much. Compare the quality of graduates instead.

Out of state U Wisconsin Madison is 18%. On no cheesehead planet does that approach the 7% Cornell acceptance rate. And feel sure to provide data showing the quality of UW graduates vs. Cornell. But remember, most college graduates know that your opinion is not the same as data.

Can you provide any data that there is a meaningful difference in graduates? My firm has blacklisted Cornell from our recruitment program after multiple bad hires but is actively recruiting from Wisconsin. The job market is what matters.

Your anecdote does not equal to the job market. I can't believe I need to explain that to an adult, presumably one with a degree. All you have is an opinion...and not a particularly educated one at that. What is obvious is that it's a lot harder to get into Cornell than UW.

You are the one who has provided nothing but opinion. My firm is rather large and has extensive hiring experience with college graduates.

Out of state acceptance into Cornell is not harder. You fail to understand what an acceptance rate means. It often just means more applications from under qualified students, such as international students or students looking for financial aid.

It is getting funny at how biased you are in this comparison while not providing any actual arguments.

What evidence do you have that Cornell with its 7% acceptance rate is getting underqualified applicants while University of Wisconsin with its 43% acceptance rate (18% out of state) is getting all academic stars?

Give it a rest and reread the prior posts. Job placement is what matters, especially into competitive fields with compensation to match.

Your prior posts are nonsensical...except to people who believe that 7% is equal to 18%. Show us the numbers that prove that U Wisconsin has the stellar job placement that exceeds Cornell, or you're just a cheesehead with a sad lack of analytical skills.

Everybody knows that financial aid programs and international outreach inflate admissions rates, which are a misused and misunderstood metric.

Your insults reflect your lack of intelligence. Nobody at this point is taking you seriously.

Ah yes. Because they'll take someone who has zero evidence to back up their U Wisconsin superiority theory seriously. Enjoy the cheddar and be glad you're not applying for admissions to U Wisconsin now. I hear they're requiring students to have basic math as a pre-req.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cornell vs Wisconsin that is a joke.

Wisconsin in the early 2000s became the it school for NE parents because their darlings couldn't cut it at state flagships or Ivies.

Wisconsin grew into a good business school from that with mommy and daddy in Chicago and NY networking for them.

Is Wisconsin worth it now OOS hell no not with the Trump administration destroying the economy. Financial stupidity if your kid gets into a state flagship as well.

Is it a fun school yes, are the kids smart yep are they as smart as Cornell kids not in any reality. Huge difference in job offers from WI vs Cornell.

You are living in the past. Wisconsin is hot among high schoolers. Cornell is the exact opposite. As for job opportunities, let the results speak for themself. We actively recruit Wisconsin grads.

What cheesehead planet are you living on? Here's some actual data. No one is picking U. Wisconsin over Cornell, unless they live in Wisconsin and it would save their parents a bundle on tuition.
Cornell acceptance rate: 7.36%
U. Wisconsin Madison rate: 43%

Out of state acceptance rates are roughly equivalent. That also isn’t a metric that means much. Compare the quality of graduates instead.

Out of state U Wisconsin Madison is 18%. On no cheesehead planet does that approach the 7% Cornell acceptance rate. And feel sure to provide data showing the quality of UW graduates vs. Cornell. But remember, most college graduates know that your opinion is not the same as data.

Can you provide any data that there is a meaningful difference in graduates? My firm has blacklisted Cornell from our recruitment program after multiple bad hires but is actively recruiting from Wisconsin. The job market is what matters.

Your anecdote does not equal to the job market. I can't believe I need to explain that to an adult, presumably one with a degree. All you have is an opinion...and not a particularly educated one at that. What is obvious is that it's a lot harder to get into Cornell than UW.

You are the one who has provided nothing but opinion. My firm is rather large and has extensive hiring experience with college graduates.

Out of state acceptance into Cornell is not harder. You fail to understand what an acceptance rate means. It often just means more applications from under qualified students, such as international students or students looking for financial aid.

It is getting funny at how biased you are in this comparison while not providing any actual arguments.

What evidence do you have that Cornell with its 7% acceptance rate is getting underqualified applicants while University of Wisconsin with its 43% acceptance rate (18% out of state) is getting all academic stars?

Give it a rest and reread the prior posts. Job placement is what matters, especially into competitive fields with compensation to match.

Your prior posts are nonsensical...except to people who believe that 7% is equal to 18%. Show us the numbers that prove that U Wisconsin has the stellar job placement that exceeds Cornell, or you're just a cheesehead with a sad lack of analytical skills.

Everybody knows that financial aid programs and international outreach inflate admissions rates, which are a misused and misunderstood metric.

Your insults reflect your lack of intelligence. Nobody at this point is taking you seriously.

Ah yes. Because they'll take someone who has zero evidence to back up their U Wisconsin superiority theory seriously. Enjoy the cheddar and be glad you're not applying for admissions to U Wisconsin now. I hear they're requiring students to have basic math as a pre-req.

We found the thin-skinned Cornell grad being oddly defensive yet again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cornell vs Wisconsin that is a joke.

Wisconsin in the early 2000s became the it school for NE parents because their darlings couldn't cut it at state flagships or Ivies.

Wisconsin grew into a good business school from that with mommy and daddy in Chicago and NY networking for them.

Is Wisconsin worth it now OOS hell no not with the Trump administration destroying the economy. Financial stupidity if your kid gets into a state flagship as well.

Is it a fun school yes, are the kids smart yep are they as smart as Cornell kids not in any reality. Huge difference in job offers from WI vs Cornell.

You are living in the past. Wisconsin is hot among high schoolers. Cornell is the exact opposite. As for job opportunities, let the results speak for themself. We actively recruit Wisconsin grads.

What cheesehead planet are you living on? Here's some actual data. No one is picking U. Wisconsin over Cornell, unless they live in Wisconsin and it would save their parents a bundle on tuition.
Cornell acceptance rate: 7.36%
U. Wisconsin Madison rate: 43%

Out of state acceptance rates are roughly equivalent. That also isn’t a metric that means much. Compare the quality of graduates instead.

Out of state U Wisconsin Madison is 18%. On no cheesehead planet does that approach the 7% Cornell acceptance rate. And feel sure to provide data showing the quality of UW graduates vs. Cornell. But remember, most college graduates know that your opinion is not the same as data.

Can you provide any data that there is a meaningful difference in graduates? My firm has blacklisted Cornell from our recruitment program after multiple bad hires but is actively recruiting from Wisconsin. The job market is what matters.

Your anecdote does not equal to the job market. I can't believe I need to explain that to an adult, presumably one with a degree. All you have is an opinion...and not a particularly educated one at that. What is obvious is that it's a lot harder to get into Cornell than UW.

You are the one who has provided nothing but opinion. My firm is rather large and has extensive hiring experience with college graduates.

Out of state acceptance into Cornell is not harder. You fail to understand what an acceptance rate means. It often just means more applications from under qualified students, such as international students or students looking for financial aid.

It is getting funny at how biased you are in this comparison while not providing any actual arguments.

What evidence do you have that Cornell with its 7% acceptance rate is getting underqualified applicants while University of Wisconsin with its 43% acceptance rate (18% out of state) is getting all academic stars?

Give it a rest and reread the prior posts. Job placement is what matters, especially into competitive fields with compensation to match.

Your prior posts are nonsensical...except to people who believe that 7% is equal to 18%. Show us the numbers that prove that U Wisconsin has the stellar job placement that exceeds Cornell, or you're just a cheesehead with a sad lack of analytical skills.

Everybody knows that financial aid programs and international outreach inflate admissions rates, which are a misused and misunderstood metric.

Your insults reflect your lack of intelligence. Nobody at this point is taking you seriously.

Ah yes. Because they'll take someone who has zero evidence to back up their U Wisconsin superiority theory seriously. Enjoy the cheddar and be glad you're not applying for admissions to U Wisconsin now. I hear they're requiring students to have basic math as a pre-req.

We found the thin-skinned Cornell grad being oddly defensive yet again.

Who would hire one of these twerps?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cornell vs Wisconsin that is a joke.

Wisconsin in the early 2000s became the it school for NE parents because their darlings couldn't cut it at state flagships or Ivies.

Wisconsin grew into a good business school from that with mommy and daddy in Chicago and NY networking for them.

Is Wisconsin worth it now OOS hell no not with the Trump administration destroying the economy. Financial stupidity if your kid gets into a state flagship as well.

Is it a fun school yes, are the kids smart yep are they as smart as Cornell kids not in any reality. Huge difference in job offers from WI vs Cornell.

You are living in the past. Wisconsin is hot among high schoolers. Cornell is the exact opposite. As for job opportunities, let the results speak for themself. We actively recruit Wisconsin grads.

What cheesehead planet are you living on? Here's some actual data. No one is picking U. Wisconsin over Cornell, unless they live in Wisconsin and it would save their parents a bundle on tuition.
Cornell acceptance rate: 7.36%
U. Wisconsin Madison rate: 43%

Out of state acceptance rates are roughly equivalent. That also isn’t a metric that means much. Compare the quality of graduates instead.

Out of state U Wisconsin Madison is 18%. On no cheesehead planet does that approach the 7% Cornell acceptance rate. And feel sure to provide data showing the quality of UW graduates vs. Cornell. But remember, most college graduates know that your opinion is not the same as data.

Can you provide any data that there is a meaningful difference in graduates? My firm has blacklisted Cornell from our recruitment program after multiple bad hires but is actively recruiting from Wisconsin. The job market is what matters.

Your anecdote does not equal to the job market. I can't believe I need to explain that to an adult, presumably one with a degree. All you have is an opinion...and not a particularly educated one at that. What is obvious is that it's a lot harder to get into Cornell than UW.

You are the one who has provided nothing but opinion. My firm is rather large and has extensive hiring experience with college graduates.

Out of state acceptance into Cornell is not harder. You fail to understand what an acceptance rate means. It often just means more applications from under qualified students, such as international students or students looking for financial aid.

It is getting funny at how biased you are in this comparison while not providing any actual arguments.

What evidence do you have that Cornell with its 7% acceptance rate is getting underqualified applicants while University of Wisconsin with its 43% acceptance rate (18% out of state) is getting all academic stars?

Give it a rest and reread the prior posts. Job placement is what matters, especially into competitive fields with compensation to match.

Your prior posts are nonsensical...except to people who believe that 7% is equal to 18%. Show us the numbers that prove that U Wisconsin has the stellar job placement that exceeds Cornell, or you're just a cheesehead with a sad lack of analytical skills.

Everybody knows that financial aid programs and international outreach inflate admissions rates, which are a misused and misunderstood metric.

Your insults reflect your lack of intelligence. Nobody at this point is taking you seriously.

Ah yes. Because they'll take someone who has zero evidence to back up their U Wisconsin superiority theory seriously. Enjoy the cheddar and be glad you're not applying for admissions to U Wisconsin now. I hear they're requiring students to have basic math as a pre-req.

We found the thin-skinned Cornell grad being oddly defensive yet again.

Actually, I didn't go to either Cornell or Wisconsin. But your claims were surprising, so I looked for the available data, and they show you are incorrect--Wisconsin is not superior to Cornell, according to available data.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cornell vs Wisconsin that is a joke.

Wisconsin in the early 2000s became the it school for NE parents because their darlings couldn't cut it at state flagships or Ivies.

Wisconsin grew into a good business school from that with mommy and daddy in Chicago and NY networking for them.

Is Wisconsin worth it now OOS hell no not with the Trump administration destroying the economy. Financial stupidity if your kid gets into a state flagship as well.

Is it a fun school yes, are the kids smart yep are they as smart as Cornell kids not in any reality. Huge difference in job offers from WI vs Cornell.

You are living in the past. Wisconsin is hot among high schoolers. Cornell is the exact opposite. As for job opportunities, let the results speak for themself. We actively recruit Wisconsin grads.

What cheesehead planet are you living on? Here's some actual data. No one is picking U. Wisconsin over Cornell, unless they live in Wisconsin and it would save their parents a bundle on tuition.
Cornell acceptance rate: 7.36%
U. Wisconsin Madison rate: 43%

Out of state acceptance rates are roughly equivalent. That also isn’t a metric that means much. Compare the quality of graduates instead.

Out of state U Wisconsin Madison is 18%. On no cheesehead planet does that approach the 7% Cornell acceptance rate. And feel sure to provide data showing the quality of UW graduates vs. Cornell. But remember, most college graduates know that your opinion is not the same as data.

Can you provide any data that there is a meaningful difference in graduates? My firm has blacklisted Cornell from our recruitment program after multiple bad hires but is actively recruiting from Wisconsin. The job market is what matters.

Your anecdote does not equal to the job market. I can't believe I need to explain that to an adult, presumably one with a degree. All you have is an opinion...and not a particularly educated one at that. What is obvious is that it's a lot harder to get into Cornell than UW.

You are the one who has provided nothing but opinion. My firm is rather large and has extensive hiring experience with college graduates.

Out of state acceptance into Cornell is not harder. You fail to understand what an acceptance rate means. It often just means more applications from under qualified students, such as international students or students looking for financial aid.

It is getting funny at how biased you are in this comparison while not providing any actual arguments.

What evidence do you have that Cornell with its 7% acceptance rate is getting underqualified applicants while University of Wisconsin with its 43% acceptance rate (18% out of state) is getting all academic stars?

Give it a rest and reread the prior posts. Job placement is what matters, especially into competitive fields with compensation to match.

Cornell lists the data of the class of 2024 six months after graduation as: employed (64%), attending grad school (31%), other endeavors such as volunteer work, preparing for graduate school (2%) and seeking employment (2%). Why don't you explain why you think Wisconsin's record so much better...
https://as.cornell.edu/careers/careers-after-cornell

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I reject OP's premise. SUNY Stonybrook is ranked #56 out 436 universities nationwide. Its in-state tuition is about 10K (not including books and housing). It's pretty similar to U. Maryland's rankings.

Maryland is 44th and on an upward trajectory. Not comparable, IMO.

[Anonymous]

Rutgers and SUNY schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cornell vs Wisconsin that is a joke.

Wisconsin in the early 2000s became the it school for NE parents because their darlings couldn't cut it at state flagships or Ivies.

Wisconsin grew into a good business school from that with mommy and daddy in Chicago and NY networking for them.

Is Wisconsin worth it now OOS hell no not with the Trump administration destroying the economy. Financial stupidity if your kid gets into a state flagship as well.

Is it a fun school yes, are the kids smart yep are they as smart as Cornell kids not in any reality. Huge difference in job offers from WI vs Cornell.

You are living in the past. Wisconsin is hot among high schoolers. Cornell is the exact opposite. As for job opportunities, let the results speak for themself. We actively recruit Wisconsin grads.

What cheesehead planet are you living on? Here's some actual data. No one is picking U. Wisconsin over Cornell, unless they live in Wisconsin and it would save their parents a bundle on tuition.
Cornell acceptance rate: 7.36%
U. Wisconsin Madison rate: 43%

Out of state acceptance rates are roughly equivalent. That also isn’t a metric that means much. Compare the quality of graduates instead.

Out of state U Wisconsin Madison is 18%. On no cheesehead planet does that approach the 7% Cornell acceptance rate. And feel sure to provide data showing the quality of UW graduates vs. Cornell. But remember, most college graduates know that your opinion is not the same as data.

Can you provide any data that there is a meaningful difference in graduates? My firm has blacklisted Cornell from our recruitment program after multiple bad hires but is actively recruiting from Wisconsin. The job market is what matters.

Your anecdote does not equal to the job market. I can't believe I need to explain that to an adult, presumably one with a degree. All you have is an opinion...and not a particularly educated one at that. What is obvious is that it's a lot harder to get into Cornell than UW.

You are the one who has provided nothing but opinion. My firm is rather large and has extensive hiring experience with college graduates.

Out of state acceptance into Cornell is not harder. You fail to understand what an acceptance rate means. It often just means more applications from under qualified students, such as international students or students looking for financial aid.

It is getting funny at how biased you are in this comparison while not providing any actual arguments.

What evidence do you have that Cornell with its 7% acceptance rate is getting underqualified applicants while University of Wisconsin with its 43% acceptance rate (18% out of state) is getting all academic stars?

Give it a rest and reread the prior posts. Job placement is what matters, especially into competitive fields with compensation to match.

Cornell lists the data of the class of 2024 six months after graduation as: employed (64%), attending grad school (31%), other endeavors such as volunteer work, preparing for graduate school (2%) and seeking employment (2%). Why don't you explain why you think Wisconsin's record so much better...
https://as.cornell.edu/careers/careers-after-cornell

+1 I do occasional recruiting for my company and University of Wisconsin isn't on the list of schools we visit. Cornell is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cornell vs Wisconsin that is a joke.

Wisconsin in the early 2000s became the it school for NE parents because their darlings couldn't cut it at state flagships or Ivies.

Wisconsin grew into a good business school from that with mommy and daddy in Chicago and NY networking for them.

Is Wisconsin worth it now OOS hell no not with the Trump administration destroying the economy. Financial stupidity if your kid gets into a state flagship as well.

Is it a fun school yes, are the kids smart yep are they as smart as Cornell kids not in any reality. Huge difference in job offers from WI vs Cornell.

You are living in the past. Wisconsin is hot among high schoolers. Cornell is the exact opposite. As for job opportunities, let the results speak for themself. We actively recruit Wisconsin grads.

What cheesehead planet are you living on? Here's some actual data. No one is picking U. Wisconsin over Cornell, unless they live in Wisconsin and it would save their parents a bundle on tuition.
Cornell acceptance rate: 7.36%
U. Wisconsin Madison rate: 43%

Out of state acceptance rates are roughly equivalent. That also isn’t a metric that means much. Compare the quality of graduates instead.

Out of state U Wisconsin Madison is 18%. On no cheesehead planet does that approach the 7% Cornell acceptance rate. And feel sure to provide data showing the quality of UW graduates vs. Cornell. But remember, most college graduates know that your opinion is not the same as data.

Can you provide any data that there is a meaningful difference in graduates? My firm has blacklisted Cornell from our recruitment program after multiple bad hires but is actively recruiting from Wisconsin. The job market is what matters.

Your anecdote does not equal to the job market. I can't believe I need to explain that to an adult, presumably one with a degree. All you have is an opinion...and not a particularly educated one at that. What is obvious is that it's a lot harder to get into Cornell than UW.

You are the one who has provided nothing but opinion. My firm is rather large and has extensive hiring experience with college graduates.

Out of state acceptance into Cornell is not harder. You fail to understand what an acceptance rate means. It often just means more applications from under qualified students, such as international students or students looking for financial aid.

It is getting funny at how biased you are in this comparison while not providing any actual arguments.

What evidence do you have that Cornell with its 7% acceptance rate is getting underqualified applicants while University of Wisconsin with its 43% acceptance rate (18% out of state) is getting all academic stars?

Give it a rest and reread the prior posts. Job placement is what matters, especially into competitive fields with compensation to match.

Cornell lists the data of the class of 2024 six months after graduation as: employed (64%), attending grad school (31%), other endeavors such as volunteer work, preparing for graduate school (2%) and seeking employment (2%). Why don't you explain why you think Wisconsin's record so much better...
https://as.cornell.edu/careers/careers-after-cornell

+1 I do occasional recruiting for my company and University of Wisconsin isn't on the list of schools we visit. Cornell is.

You should consider adding it. Speaking from our own experience, we have gotten some great hires there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I reject OP's premise. SUNY Stonybrook is ranked #56 out 436 universities nationwide. Its in-state tuition is about 10K (not including books and housing). It's pretty similar to U. Maryland's rankings.

Maryland is 44th and on an upward trajectory. Not comparable, IMO.

#56 vs. #44 (subjectively measured) is not comparable?

OK, then.