Here’s hoping!
|
| If conversations haven’t happened already, players with August or September birthdays should start examining the rosters of both possible teams and scenarios and start the lines of communications with coaches and directors about their intentions with such players. Depending on skill level or makeup is teams, these players could fit into different roles. |
This seems like an if it doesn't fix everything, we shouldn't do anything argument. It is not hard to grasp dates moving from Jan-Dec to Aug-July but people do try their best to get confused and try to throw sand in the gears. You can always play a year up. There are many clubs fighting for your dollars and they make exceptions to increase revenue. |
Not arguing. Just pointing out that September birthdays would actually be the youngest, not August. |
The day a school district holds their first day of school is not the same as the cutoff date. In Fairfax school starts around the 3rd week of August. The cut off date to join a grade is September 30th though. You need to pay attention to the cut off dates not the first day of school. |
Its not a couple of weeks, its 2 months. Which, yes, is less than the 3 months of Oct-Dec, but not really by much. Saying its weeks vs 4 months is incorrect. Kids born all of August and all of September are the new cohort not playing with their grade. |
| Genuinely curious…What does that look like for those players? Would clubs allow those children to play with their grade? It’s definitely an option instead of prohibited for Oct -Dec with the birth year system. |
True. But there’s more kids in those Aug/ Sept that were held back for another year or repeat grade in elementary school |
I dont agree that that is the majority. But I do know this change will be a reason for families to consider holding their kids back. Which is not a good thing. |
Which is true for Fairfax County but most school systems have a cutoff of August 31 or earlier. So that would be 2 months versus 4 months. And the 2 months kids would still have the option of playing up if they’re good enough or if some club wants their money to place them on the third or fourth team with their friends. Options versus no options. |
I think the entire state of Va is September 30. And I think the entire state of MD is September 1. DC is also September 30. "Options" are not always a universally good thing. Not all of those options are ones my kids or I would want. Telling people they have options when the options arent positive isnt a good thing. |
| Would USSSA follow this decision? I’m pretty clueless so please don’t berate me! |
If your kid is good enough they can play up. If they aren't what's the problem? The competitive level should not matter socially. They aren't trapped if they aren't good enough to play up a year. That whole argument is idiotic and not the point of the change. The change is to be more universal to Europe. Everyone claiming it's about grade/peers just wants that older age/bigger size competitive edge that won't matter professionally or collegially because their player isn't good enough to play up to start with they are not an amazing top tier player. Just call it what it actually is. |
If a hypothetical August kid has the option to (1) play up with grade level, knowing he/she is the youngest in the grade and would likewise be the youngest on the team, or (2) playing down with the grade behind, being the oldest on the team, what's the missing option you want? Split the teams with half one grade and half another grade so he/she can be in the middle of the age group rather than at either end of it? |
"It's not an option if it doesn't fit my kid perfectly!" |