Really? You grab it before they do. Or take it away from them before they throw it. It's time for you to retire. |
Just to underscore, a kid without an IEP also doesn't have a restraint and seclusion plan. No one can touch the child without one, even to protect the child from himself. |
| But if you grab it from them, you might hurt their arm. And it’s “just” a water bottle, which is property, and we are not supposed to intervene until someone is in physical danger. So the kid has to swing/throw the thing to trigger the condition allowing us to grab it, at which point we have to have superhero reflexes to put ourselves between the bottle and whatever it’s being hurled/swung at. |
If you were the parent of a neurotypical student on the receiving end of violence you would stop spouting off like this. |
They need to be sent somewhere. |
Sure, Jan. Or you could retire, since you clearly lack the common sense necessary to be around kids. |
|
I truly cannot understand the patent defense of violent children- disabled or not- throughout this thread.
As a special education teacher I can promise you, the ‘everyone in gen Ed’ model is not only failing students, it’s creating real and lifelong trauma. To the student and their peers. What a gross oversimplification to think that putting those kids in a more restrictive program is comparable to prison or that if only their needs were met, or mental health provided- that this would get better. It won’t. Real harm is happening. and all these keyboard warriors who have never taught, or been on a crisis team, should spend less time typing and more time volunteering at their kids schools. Or better yet- go volunteer at a title I school, where families can’t afford an advocate and so students don’t even have a chance at receiving appropriate services and supports. |
Best-case scenario, you’re a troll. Worst case, you’re the parent of one of these chair-throwers and inclined to blame the teachers for it. |
And those kids are going to be even worse off in a self-contained program where the teachers don't even try to teach the curriculum and where they regularly refuse meetings with the IEP team. At least in gen-ed there are others that have an incentive to address the problem. |
New to the thread Your last sentence is key. Don’t send your kids to title 1 if you can avoid it. Ask me how I know. |
Who is more culpable? The 6-year-old child with disabilities? Or the school system with a $3.2 billion budget that refuses to provide the necessary supports to create a safe and effective educational environment? |
I can only imagine it is the parent of such a child. The parent refuses to fully accept that their child has serious problems and should not be in a mainstream class. They believe their kid should be in a mainstream class because they don’t want their kid in a special school with “those types of kids”. They do t accept their kid is one of “those types of kids”. They’ll blame everyone but themselves and their kid. |
Complain all you want, but until and unless the self-contained programs significantly improve, parents of kids with special needs will continue to want their kids in gen-ed. And the law is on their side. |
NP. Surely you're aware that there are ~25 kids in these classrooms. There's no way a teacher is grabbing something away if she's across the room. Are you always this obtuse? I suggest you spend some time volunteering in the classroom to see what the realities are. Oh, and as teachers retire, there isn't a fresh crop to replace them. Think about that for a minute. |
I find this skepticism surprising. I have a neurotypical kindergartener who fortunately is not prone to violence, but I have zero doubt she would be physically capable of this. |